Notices
VQ35HR Mods and Support related to the 2007/08 High Revving VQ

Dynocom vs Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #1  
JZK's Avatar
JZK
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky :D
Default Dynocom vs Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet

All Dyno runs are with 93 octane pump gas.
Humidity & Elevation are all similar.

All Jap Performance
Dynocom results:
Best run: 340.9whp / 315.0 ft-lbs

Name:  jason.jpg
Views: 7032
Size:  51.9 KB

Japtrix Racing
Mustang Dyno Results:
Best Run: 306whp / 254ft-lbs

Chart
Name:  IMG00160.jpg
Views: 5821
Size:  42.0 KB

Numbers
Name:  IMG00159.jpg
Views: 5839
Size:  17.0 KB

STP Motorports
Dynojet Results:
Best Run: 311whp / 260ft-lbs

Name:  IMG00162.jpg
Views: 5914
Size:  18.5 KB

Superflow: ?
Dynapac: ?
Dyno Dynamics: ?

Last edited by JZK; Dec 19, 2008 at 09:11 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #2  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

dynocom should be renamed dynoqueencom

i would probably have a 700whp car on dynoqueencom

mustang isnt as bad but its still pretty bad.

ever hear an s2k owner claiming 250whp stock... dynoqueencom!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #3  
JZK's Avatar
JZK
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky :D
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx

mustang isnt as bad but its still pretty bad.
What do you mean by that? Mustang Dyno's are the most reliable and accurate dyno's to date. That's also why they are called heartbreak dyno's... since dynojets, dynocoms, superflow windyns, superflow aerodyns, etc. all read higher. Correct me if I'm mistaken..
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:32 PM
  #4  
singh's Avatar
singh
_______________
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
dynocom should be renamed dynoqueencom

i would probably have a 700whp car on dynoqueencom

mustang isnt as bad but its still pretty bad.

ever hear an s2k owner claiming 250whp stock... dynoqueencom!
Dyno's should not be taken for bragging rights. They are tools that are calibrated differently everywhere. Used mainly for before/after tuning results.

Nothing wrong with dynocom. What would have interested me is if the OP would have done before/after dyno's on all his mods. Back to back on the same dyno to be accurate. It would have been nice to see exactly where in his power cure he gained power.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
JZK's Avatar
JZK
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky :D
Default

Originally Posted by gsingh350Z
Dyno's should not be taken for bragging rights. They are tools that are calibrated differently everywhere. Used mainly for before/after tuning results.

Nothing wrong with dynocom. What would have interested me is if the OP would have done before/after dyno's on all his mods. Back to back on the same dyno to be accurate. It would have been nice to see exactly where in his power cure he gained power.
I completely agree with you, just wanted to make this thread to show how every dyno is different; also depending on calibration, but just to get an idea of where each dyno stands. I just need to dyno on a dynojet and a superflow and then I could compare all 4.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #6  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by gsingh350Z
Dyno's should not be taken for bragging rights. They are tools that are calibrated differently everywhere. Used mainly for before/after tuning results.

Nothing wrong with dynocom. What would have interested me is if the OP would have done before/after dyno's on all his mods. Back to back on the same dyno to be accurate. It would have been nice to see exactly where in his power cure he gained power.
that's the problem. "should not be used" unfortunately they are and often customers get the wrong idea of how much power the shop's work actually gave them. they can also mislead other people into thinking that they can have a 350whp Z with simple bolt-ons.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #7  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

Very Nice numbers. Should be a completly differnet beast. Enjoy the car and eat some 370's
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
JZK's Avatar
JZK
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky :D
Default

lol Arsh. Im looking forward to them coming out, lets eat some together
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #9  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Id like to be the first to say thank you for ur efforts and spending ur time and money on this. Pretty cool experiment. Never would have guessed the differences would be so huge from dyno to dyno
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #10  
TrackPack's Avatar
TrackPack
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Mb, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by JZK
What do you mean by that? Mustang Dyno's are the most reliable and accurate dyno's to date. That's also why they are called heartbreak dyno's... since dynojets, dynocoms, superflow windyns, superflow aerodyns, etc. all read higher. Correct me if I'm mistaken..

I have only used 2 dyno's to date, a mustang and a superflow. The results of multiple cars and multiple tests were that the mustang read higher every time..by a substantial margin.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #11  
A.H's Avatar
A.H
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 818
Default

Originally Posted by JZK
lol Arsh. Im looking forward to them coming out, lets eat some together
You take the east coast and I'll take the west coast
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #12  
8cd03gro's Avatar
8cd03gro
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Default

Mustang dyno's are more effected by calibration that almost any other type of dynomometer. That's why most of the time they are considered the most accurate, but can show significantly higher or lower numbers than other types of dyno's depending on how they are calibrated. I'm surprised you dynoed higher with the mustang dyno than with the dynojet, but they are both probably quite accurate. Different days, different temps, different humidity, etc. can change numbers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
silverbullet_Z
NA Builds
24
Nov 14, 2015 02:52 AM
Alexreyes
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
13
Sep 30, 2015 11:30 PM
B Esquire
Autocross/Road
0
Sep 24, 2015 07:52 AM
NissanZcrazy
Forced Induction
4
Sep 23, 2015 07:59 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.