NEW Intake Manifold for VQ35HR!!
02-24-2009, 04:14 PM
#61
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-24-2009, 06:07 PM
#62
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can anyone actually enlighten me and explain to me the difference between getting the manifold in brushed aluminum or stainless steel? im guessing the 304 stainless steel is better.
02-24-2009, 07:05 PM
#64
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aluminum and stainless steel would each transfer heat differently as well. I don't know how big of a difference there would be or which one is better though.
02-24-2009, 07:33 PM
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello everyone, my name is John and I am the one who replies to the emails at Revshift. I see there is quite a bit of interest in our new manifold. We are working very hard to make the pictures and detailed information available. We are hoping for a 15 to 20 hp increase in our new tests. If the testing shows much lower results then we will be making minor changes to the design until we achieve our hp goals. We are very dedicated to making this manifold perform correctly and we will not give up until we have done just that. Thank you all for your support.
02-24-2009, 08:08 PM
#67
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-24-2009, 08:46 PM
#71
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mohegan Lake, NY
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well i was assuming that the manifold was going to look like the DE one except with another tube for the second throttle body. if it can make 18 hp in the midrange which is what im expecting from somthing like this it would be nice.
02-24-2009, 09:49 PM
#74
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
304 SS is generally the better option. Aluminum is lighter but that's the only advantage really. Aluminum is also very dull looking metal and doesn't give that "bling" factor. Also, I am 90% sure the 304 SS is better for keeping cooler tempertures. The 304 SS is very shiny as well and if polished correctly can be as reflective as a mirror. And teh 304 SS is always the more expensive and popular choice on aftermarket components. And every exhasut component I buy is always in 304 SS
Last edited by A.H; 02-24-2009 at 09:52 PM.
02-25-2009, 02:21 AM
#77
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal 818
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
