Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

18x10.5 +13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2005, 05:19 PM
  #1  
smellslikecurry
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
smellslikecurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 18x10.5 +13

ront is +21 9.0" with 225/40/18 falken 512's
rear 10.5" +13 offset w/ 265/35/18 falken 512's

will those fit
Old 08-28-2005, 05:27 PM
  #2  
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Zexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORLANDO, FL
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With your fenders rolled you should be fine. This is MY opinion.
Old 08-28-2005, 05:28 PM
  #3  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Front might on a non lowered vehicle. Rear no way. 10.5 +22 is the lowest practical offset you can go with.

Respect
JET
Old 08-28-2005, 05:35 PM
  #4  
ppw350Zunit
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
ppw350Zunit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zexy
With your fenders rolled you should be fine. This is MY opinion.
+1
Old 08-28-2005, 05:47 PM
  #5  
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Zexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORLANDO, FL
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JETPILOT
Front might on a non lowered vehicle. Rear no way. 10.5 +22 is the lowest practical offset you can go with.

Respect
JET
I highly disagree. It will fit if the fenders are rolled.

Last edited by Zexy; 08-28-2005 at 05:49 PM.
Old 08-28-2005, 05:51 PM
  #6  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

10.5 + 13 ????? I'd have to see that to believe it. You're going to have to provide some credible proof as in pics or posts here that a 10.5 +13 will work. I had a 10.5 +22, and that was the limit. There wasn't another 1cm of room. I am lowered 1 1/4 in the rear.

Respect
JET
Old 08-28-2005, 06:57 PM
  #7  
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Zexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORLANDO, FL
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well like he said he has a 265 tire.

Rim manufacturers are different, your fenders are not rolled, and camber also affects fitment. You just can't just jump straight into an assumption.

Don't get me wrong..It's a tight fit but it'll be fine with that tire.

smellslikecurry, what wheels are they by the way?
Old 08-28-2005, 07:55 PM
  #8  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

265 tire or not.... it still wouldn't work. It doesn't matter who manufacturers the rim. Offset is offset. How do you know if my fenders are rolled or not???? BTW they are rolled. 10.5 +22 wouldn't fit withpout rolling. Show me a 10.5" +13 on a Z? It can't be done.

In regard to tire size which no one has adressed. a 225 on a 9.0 rim won't work, and neither will a 265 on a 10.5. This whole setup sucks and has no business on the Z.

Respect
JET

Last edited by JETPILOT; 08-28-2005 at 07:59 PM.
Old 08-28-2005, 08:17 PM
  #9  
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
iTrader: (234)
 
Rickdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: My350z
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Zexy is right!

LMAO! I have seen 20x11 with a 17 offset on the rear of a Z with stock fenders! Dunlops and Falkens will give you more clearance since their sidewall designs seem to collapse more. I run 19x11 on my car with no problems and my bumper is 2 inches from the ground.

Believe it or not, the rim being made by a different rim company will make a difference since there are different disks that are used to maximize lip and clearance

Here is the pic of the 20's I was talking about







PROOFFFFF!!!!!!!

Last edited by Rickdogg; 08-28-2005 at 08:28 PM.
Old 08-28-2005, 08:24 PM
  #10  
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (2)
 
MY350Z.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Damn that's a clean ride. NICE!
Old 08-29-2005, 04:17 AM
  #11  
smellslikecurry
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
smellslikecurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

work vsxx
Old 08-29-2005, 07:59 AM
  #12  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Damn !!!! I hate bing wrong. If I didn't see it I wouldn't have believed it. U have no rubbing?

Respect
JET
Old 08-29-2005, 09:04 AM
  #13  
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
iTrader: (234)
 
Rickdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: My350z
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JETPILOT
Damn !!!! I hate bing wrong. If I didn't see it I wouldn't have believed it. U have no rubbing?

Respect
JET
Don't worry about it man. We are all here to learn from one another to take our vehicles to the next level. The pics i provided above are from the sponsored Z from Speed Alliance. It has cut fenders inside, which is basically an aggressive roll I have a 19x11 with a rolled fender and it fits just fine.
Old 08-29-2005, 06:03 PM
  #14  
drumma022
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
drumma022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORL, FL
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

10.5 + 13 ????? I'd have to see that to believe it. You're going to have to provide some credible proof as in pics or posts here that a 10.5 +13 will work. I had a 10.5 +22, and that was the limit. There wasn't another 1cm of room. I am lowered 1 1/4 in the rear.
265 tire or not.... it still wouldn't work. It doesn't matter who manufacturers the rim. Offset is offset. How do you know if my fenders are rolled or not???? BTW they are rolled. 10.5 +22 wouldn't fit withpout rolling. Show me a 10.5" +13 on a Z? It can't be done.

In regard to tire size which no one has adressed. a 225 on a 9.0 rim won't work, and neither will a 265 on a 10.5. This whole setup sucks and has no business on the Z
Proof + Pics and actual offset #'s.
I have not rolled the fender one bit and it fits when slammed.
19x9.5 +11 235/35/19
19x10.5 +11 265/30/19



stfuad
Old 08-29-2005, 06:12 PM
  #15  
drumma022
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
drumma022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORL, FL
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RICKDOGG - you always post wheel sizing, but not offset #'s! What is the offset on your x11's!??
Old 08-29-2005, 06:35 PM
  #16  
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Zexy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORLANDO, FL
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I rest my case JETPILOT.
Old 08-29-2005, 06:39 PM
  #17  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I checked out your other pics on this thread you posted https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-tires/138338-sf-chal-11-slammed-on-stock-fenders.html .

What you failed to tell us is that you have at least negative 4 degrees of camber !!

It's my opinion that "fitting" means at normal camber settings. 1-2.5 degrees.

If you put on the right size tires on the car we wouldn't be having this conversation. 235/35 on a 9.5 wide rim and 265/30 on a 10.5 wheel is too narrow. The tire is stretched. The aspect ratios and rolling diameters are incorrect as well. The rolling diameter is smaller than stock.

Sooooo my definition of fitting is way different than yours.

Respect
JET
Old 08-29-2005, 06:58 PM
  #18  
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i think JETPILOT and everyone else is looking at this issue in two different ways. in regards to JET's responses- i think you are talking about more towards what is more realistic and somewhat practical and correct when it comes to tire aspects and rolling diameters, more like on the books settings, no offense.
everyone else, inlcuding me is more on the make it fit attitude like my fellow drifters from zilvia.net, forget practicality and correct camber and such, make it fit and do whatever to accomplish which includes fender mods, lots and lots of camber, and suspension mods. so i believe everyone has a valid point to an extent. now it all depends if the owner of the rims wants to go through that or stick to whats commonly fitted. rest my case.
Old 08-29-2005, 07:07 PM
  #19  
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
JETPILOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I agree.... this is a case of mild or wild.

Respect
JET
Old 08-29-2005, 07:10 PM
  #20  
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

damn all that typing and i couldve just said that! hehe


Quick Reply: 18x10.5 +13



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:52 PM.