Non-Staggered Setup - the Final Answer
Originally Posted by DOHC
This is the real worry for me, I can live with the TCS issue, but if the brakes go goofy you could die on these Houston roads!

Originally Posted by DOHC
In the end I'm getting four 18x8.5s, and PS2s with 245/40 up front and 255/40 in back. This is better balanced than the 245/275 stagger so many use, looks fine, gives a big increase in grip and response over the factory 17s, and I saved a total of 14.6 pounds in wheels and tires. That should offset the increased moment of inertia with the 18s, and maybe even give a tiny boost to acceleration. Thanks everyone for their input in this thread, maybe some day we'll find out the whole story. 

Originally Posted by 350Zenophile
DOHC, Thinking of doing the same...what was the end result? TCS happy/unhappy? any pics?
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/0404scc_350z/
For pictures:
http://omgwtf.kicks-***.org/Images/Gateway0005.jpg
http://omgwtf.kicks-***.org/Images/Gateway0034.jpg
http://omgwtf.kicks-***.org/Images/Gateway0072.jpg
Works great!
-E
i run a staggered DD setup (245/35R19F and 275/35R19R) and a non-staggered track setup (275/40R17 all four) and the TCS does not act any differently for either set-up. i leave the TCS on for normal driving, and turn it off for track work. i cannot speak to VDC as i do not have it.
Originally Posted by MinersZ
Do you think I could run 255/45/18s on all four corners?
Originally Posted by ClaytonC01
its doable, i dont have a staggered setup right now, and the TCS doesnt kick in very often, unless im going around a sharp turn and it starts slipping out. so theres the answer to your question
From reading all the responses in this thread, I'm reminded of the "Is VDC really off when you turn it off?" discussions and the all varying responses describing people's experiences. It was suggested in that case, and I think is applicable here as well, that the year of your car, as well as model make a difference as to how sensitive the system is calibrated. I think this is why some people that have tried this had zero problems while others did.
I got my car used two months ago now. It has 18 x 8" wheels all around, but the tires are 225/45-18 up front and 265/35-18 in the rear.
According to the tire calculators out there (www.1010tires.com), my rear wheels are rotating 822 revs per mile while the fronts are 801 revs per mile.
Questions:
1) why doesn't the computer think my rear wheels are slipping then? I have my VDC on all the time, and get no indication of slippage.
2) Aren't the wheel sizes supposed to be different? That is, 7.5" in front and 8.0" in the rear? Mine are all 18 x 8.0" JJ 30 mm offset.
3) Are we absolutely sure that the wheel rotations must be different in order for VDC to work correctly? I don't understand this.
If the "stock" setup is used (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) the rear wheels would rotate 780 revs per mile and the fronts are still 801 revs per mile. So, is this the range (+/- 20 revs per mile) which the computer thinks is "normal"? If not, what's the difference then?
I have to switch to all season tires. Since my wheel are all the same size, I was thinking of using 245/45-18's all around. My car is a daily driver with no racing applications.
After reading through this thread, I more confused than ever.
Please help me out here!
Thanks very much,
Joe
According to the tire calculators out there (www.1010tires.com), my rear wheels are rotating 822 revs per mile while the fronts are 801 revs per mile.
Questions:
1) why doesn't the computer think my rear wheels are slipping then? I have my VDC on all the time, and get no indication of slippage.
2) Aren't the wheel sizes supposed to be different? That is, 7.5" in front and 8.0" in the rear? Mine are all 18 x 8.0" JJ 30 mm offset.
3) Are we absolutely sure that the wheel rotations must be different in order for VDC to work correctly? I don't understand this.
If the "stock" setup is used (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) the rear wheels would rotate 780 revs per mile and the fronts are still 801 revs per mile. So, is this the range (+/- 20 revs per mile) which the computer thinks is "normal"? If not, what's the difference then?
I have to switch to all season tires. Since my wheel are all the same size, I was thinking of using 245/45-18's all around. My car is a daily driver with no racing applications.
After reading through this thread, I more confused than ever.
Please help me out here!
Thanks very much,
Joe
Last edited by 06Firebase; Aug 19, 2006 at 05:49 AM.
Hmm, Im surprised I missed this thread! I had a set of Volk TE-37 18x8.5 all around. I had them on a previous car and put them on the Z. I had Ventus 104 sport tires in size 245/45/18 all around. I had no TCS issues at all in my 5AT or the 6MT. When those wore out however I put on staggered (F)225/45 and (R)245/45 to save a few $$$My wheels are for sale if youre interested
Originally Posted by 06Firebase
I got my car used two months ago now. It has 18 x 8" wheels all around, but the tires are 225/45-18 up front and 265/35-18 in the rear.
According to the tire calculators out there (www.1010tires.com), my rear wheels are rotating 822 revs per mile while the fronts are 801 revs per mile.
Questions:
1) why doesn't the computer think my rear wheels are slipping then? I have my VDC on all the time, and get no indication of slippage.
2) Aren't the wheel sizes supposed to be different? That is, 7.5" in front and 8.0" in the rear? Mine are all 18 x 8.0" JJ 30 mm offset.
3) Are we absolutely sure that the wheel rotations must be different in order for VDC to work correctly? I don't understand this.
If the "stock" setup is used (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) the rear wheels would rotate 780 revs per mile and the fronts are still 801 revs per mile. So, is this the range (+/- 20 revs per mile) which the computer thinks is "normal"? If not, what's the difference then?
I have to switch to all season tires. Since my wheel are all the same size, I was thinking of using 245/45-18's all around. My car is a daily driver with no racing applications.
After reading through this thread, I more confused than ever.
Please help me out here!
Thanks very much,
Joe
According to the tire calculators out there (www.1010tires.com), my rear wheels are rotating 822 revs per mile while the fronts are 801 revs per mile.
Questions:
1) why doesn't the computer think my rear wheels are slipping then? I have my VDC on all the time, and get no indication of slippage.
2) Aren't the wheel sizes supposed to be different? That is, 7.5" in front and 8.0" in the rear? Mine are all 18 x 8.0" JJ 30 mm offset.
3) Are we absolutely sure that the wheel rotations must be different in order for VDC to work correctly? I don't understand this.
If the "stock" setup is used (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) the rear wheels would rotate 780 revs per mile and the fronts are still 801 revs per mile. So, is this the range (+/- 20 revs per mile) which the computer thinks is "normal"? If not, what's the difference then?
I have to switch to all season tires. Since my wheel are all the same size, I was thinking of using 245/45-18's all around. My car is a daily driver with no racing applications.
After reading through this thread, I more confused than ever.
Please help me out here!
Thanks very much,
Joe
Originally Posted by GMZ
Hmm, Im surprised I missed this thread! I had a set of Volk TE-37 18x8.5 all around. I had them on a previous car and put them on the Z. I had Ventus 104 sport tires in size 245/45/18 all around. I had no TCS issues at all in my 5AT or the 6MT. When those wore out however I put on staggered (F)225/45 and (R)245/45 to save a few $$$My wheels are for sale if youre interested 

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
Oct 29, 2020 07:44 PM





