Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Sport Compact Car Magazine’s Project Z Tire Setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #1  
plastiketa's Avatar
plastiketa
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: The OC boyeee!!
Default Sport Compact Car Magazine’s Project Z Tire Setup

I just recently got the June issue and was reading the article on their tire setup on their 350z. They are running 275/35/18 all around w/ BBS FR18x9 and Rr18x9.5 and TCS turned off and have had great results.

Now I’m a bit confused.

As I have read if the car is equipped with a VDC, there has to be a slight difference in tire height, bias to the rear, or it will get screwed up. Won't the same thing happen with regardless if the TCS is turned off?

Any insights?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

I assume you're talking about this article:
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...t_2/index.html

1) It's not a standard everyday setup. They are going for handling as in an autocross or track car. Therefore then turn off TCS and would do the same to VDC if the car had that.

2) Most Zs with VDC will work fine with no stagger. Some are more sensitive than others and may throw the slip light during turns, etc. The thing that definitely freaks VDC out is when the fronts are taller than the rears. That's a definitely no-no.

My autocross setup is 265/35 all around. I drive to and from events on them as well as occasionally driving them for daily use. I have never had VDC kick in, even during spirited driving. I don't autocross with VDC on though as those violent moves will definitely cause it to activate.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #3  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Actually in the June article does not say they were 275/35s, it just says 275s, in the previous article that Dave posted a link to, they were using 275/40R18s all around.

One option if you what to keep the diameter difference but at the same time stay the same width, you could go with a 275/35 up front and a 275/40 out back.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #4  
plastiketa's Avatar
plastiketa
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: The OC boyeee!!
Default

My mistake, I double checked and it is 275/40/18 all around.

Chris- Arent you running the same series all around with you Kumhos? I remember reading one of your post on that setup.

Are you coming down again for the Z car show?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #5  
Korki Buchek's Avatar
Korki Buchek
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Is 275/35 (rear); 245/40 a bad setup, then?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:45 AM
  #6  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Korki Buchek
Is 275/35 (rear); 245/40 a bad setup, then?
Yes.

245/40 = 25.7" dia
275/35 = 25.6" dia

Front is 0.1" taller than rear.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:34 AM
  #7  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by plastiketa
My mistake, I double checked and it is 275/40/18 all around.

Chris- Arent you running the same series all around with you Kumhos? I remember reading one of your post on that setup.

Are you coming down again for the Z car show?
Close, I had Kuhmos last year but was running 275/35 F and 275/40 R.

I'll be at the show sporting some Goodyear GS-D3s, see how the car goes on the autocross compared to the same size SPTs I was running last year.

Look me up maybe we can get in the dame run group again.

Chris
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #8  
MustGoFastR's Avatar
MustGoFastR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
My autocross setup is 265/35 all around. I drive to and from events on them as well as occasionally driving them for daily use. I have never had VDC kick in, even during spirited driving. I don't autocross with VDC on though as those violent moves will definitely cause it to activate.

That 265/35-18, I assume?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:10 AM
  #9  
tienlo's Avatar
tienlo
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by HyperSprite
Actually in the June article does not say they were 275/35s, it just says 275s, in the previous article that Dave posted a link to, they were using 275/40R18s all around.

One option if you what to keep the diameter difference but at the same time stay the same width, you could go with a 275/35 up front and a 275/40 out back.

Chris
That's exactly what i'm running.
VDC is fine, probably kicks in a little earlier than usual but not intrusive at all. I usually turn it off for hard squirts
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #10  
Korki Buchek's Avatar
Korki Buchek
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
Yes.

245/40 = 25.7" dia
275/35 = 25.6" dia

Front is 0.1" taller than rear.
Huh, I saw a car on here that looked great, but it was even worse 255/40 18x9.5; 275/35 18x10.5
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #11  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by MustGoFastR
That 265/35-18, I assume?
Yes.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #12  
Nihilation's Avatar
Nihilation
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Korki Buchek
Huh, I saw a car on here that looked great, but it was even worse 255/40 18x9.5; 275/35 18x10.5
Huh?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #13  
ALong's Avatar
ALong
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
Yes.

245/40 = 25.7" dia
275/35 = 25.6" dia

Front is 0.1" taller than rear.
A tenth of an inch is not going to affect the VDC at all, you need to get a difference of over .5" or more to see problems with the VDC.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #14  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by ALong
A tenth of an inch is not going to affect the VDC at all, you need to get a difference of over .5" or more to see problems with the VDC.
No, you're thinking of the 0.25 to 0.75 recommended difference between the front and rear, i.e. the front being that much shorter than the rear.

He has the fronts taller than the rears. On some cars, the 0.1" difference may not cause problems, especially in straight line driving. On other cars it will cause problems. If you dig through this forum, there are a number of posts recently by people who have VDC issues and 99% of them are caused by have the fronts taller than the rears.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #15  
ALong's Avatar
ALong
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
No, you're thinking of the 0.25 to 0.75 recommended difference between the front and rear, i.e. the front being that much shorter than the rear.

He has the fronts taller than the rears. On some cars, the 0.1" difference may not cause problems, especially in straight line driving. On other cars it will cause problems. If you dig through this forum, there are a number of posts recently by people who have VDC issues and 99% of them are caused by have the fronts taller than the rears.
A Tenth of an inch is still not going to make a difference. The manufacture does not have the tolerances that close on the VDC. You can easily see a couple of tenths of an inch difference in tire wear from front to rear with the same size tires (rears wearing out quicker). The VDC is set up to account for this.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #16  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

Here's a post by somebody having problems with VDC where the fronts are only 0.3" taller than the rear..

https://my350z.com/forum/wheels-and-tires/242867-new-owner-needs-help-with-slip-light.html

One of the things that I have observed over the years is that some cars behave differently than others regarding VDC. Some people have reported VDC issues with the same size all around. Some have reported issues even with a small stagger. This was especially true of the 03 and 04 models but I haven't noticed it as much recently. Possibly Nissan relaxed the tolerance on VDC and tire sizes or maybe people have just gotten smarter and stayed away from the close sizes.

The bottom line is that if you want to avoid TCS/VDC problems, stay away from F-R staggers of less than 0.25". Yes, you might get away with it but odds are you won't.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #17  
918 Z's Avatar
918 Z
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
Default

i love my base model Z, none of that electronic bs....but i am considering doing a 17" track setup with 275 all around. what offset would i need in order to achieve this?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #18  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
Here's a post by somebody having problems with VDC where the fronts are only 0.3" taller than the rear..

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=242867

One of the things that I have observed over the years is that some cars behave differently than others regarding VDC. Some people have reported VDC issues with the same size all around. Some have reported issues even with a small stagger. This was especially true of the 03 and 04 models but I haven't noticed it as much recently. Possibly Nissan relaxed the tolerance on VDC and tire sizes or maybe people have just gotten smarter and stayed away from the close sizes.

The bottom line is that if you want to avoid TCS/VDC problems, stay away from F-R staggers of less than 0.25". Yes, you might get away with it but odds are you won't.

What would you recommend for the rear. Right now I have 275 35 19 and 245 35 19's, but I want to upgrade. I would like to go 295 in the rear and 255 in the front, but I dont want to encounter any of the vdc problems. Thanx
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #19  
DIGItonium's Avatar
DIGItonium
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,836
Likes: 1
From: Kansas
Default

^ I wanted to do the same, but there were no 295/30 for T1-R tires so I grabbed 285/35 (really needs to be 30 I think) and rolled the fenders a tiny bit.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #20  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

So you think 295 30 19 rear and 255 35 19 front will work, without vdc issues?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 PM.