Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

255/40 = 275/40 ... Wtf?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default 255/40 = 275/40 ... Wtf?

Just got the tires in from tirerack for the wife's car.

(RE050a - pole positions)

255/40-18 and 275/40-18

I expected the 275's to be wider, but they are the same width as the 255's.

I layed them down on their sides next to each other and they are the same width, exactly and the tread is the same width. Only different is that the 275/40 is a bit taller overall.

Just not what I expected... can anyone explain why this is?

Last edited by hiz-n-herz; 10-17-2007 at 09:25 PM.
Old 10-17-2007 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
Sensi09's Avatar
Sensi09
Sponsor
Works Concepts
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Default

I somewhat felt the same way. The 275s are of course wider, but the difference is just not that severe. The 255s are decently wide in themselves.
Old 10-17-2007 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28,801
Likes: 2,338
From: Sin City
Default

its only 20mm difference, and some brands have different specs and ways to measure. I know my rears are wider than my fronts, its easy to see.
Old 10-18-2007 | 01:16 AM
  #4  
nofeardude87's Avatar
nofeardude87
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: Norcal Bay Area & Hawaii
Default

yeah i think it's just cause the 20mm is not too much so maybe it looks similar. it makes sense that the 275 is wider because of the taller sidewall
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:01 AM
  #5  
lowrider's Avatar
lowrider
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Default

Just went to TireRack's site and looked up that tire. Their specs list the tread width of the 255/40/18 as 9.1" and the 275/40/18 as 10". Don't know what you are seeing.

Lou
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:04 AM
  #6  
dkmesa350z's Avatar
dkmesa350z
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta
Default

I imaging the difference with be more noticeable once the tires are mounted and on the car

Originally Posted by lowrider
Just went to TireRack's site and looked up that tire. Their specs list the tread width of the 255/40/18 as 9.1" and the 275/40/18 as 10". Don't know what you are seeing.

Lou
that is on different width wheels
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:10 AM
  #7  
lowrider's Avatar
lowrider
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by dkmesa350z
that is on different width wheels
So The overall tire width varies (.2" for every .5" width change) with wheel width change, but the tread width remains constant.

Lou
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:18 AM
  #8  
Cux350z's Avatar
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
Premier Member
iTrader: (162)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,154
Likes: 1,031
From: Greenville, SC
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
...and some brands have different specs and ways to measure....
that would hold true if the tires were from different manufacturers. The tires are all from the same manufacturer and should have different tread widths.

a 275 bridgestone should be wider then a 255 bridgestone. 20mm is nearly a inch and should be noticable.


would have to see pics of the sidewall and the comparisions.
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:05 AM
  #9  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

275 mm tires are 20 mm wider that 255 mm tires. That’s a fact.
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:12 AM
  #10  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Old 10-18-2007 | 06:37 PM
  #11  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Unhappy

Originally Posted by lowrider
Just went to TireRack's site and looked up that tire. Their specs list the tread width of the 255/40/18 as 9.1" and the 275/40/18 as 10". Don't know what you are seeing.

Lou
You're not looking at the pole positions, you're looking at regular re050a's

Pole positions are listed as such:
255/40/18 section width = 10.2", tread width = 9.3"
275/40/18 section width = 10.7", tread width = 9.3" (wtf?)

So they are even listed as having the same width tread, which is what I am seeing. I guess the 255 is wide and the 275 is narrow? They play with the tread design to try and make one look wider than the other, but the tread width is almost identical.

The casing on the 275 is not even 10mm wider than the 255. I'll post pics soon. I can't tell which is which without looking at the "size" on the tire

I am sure they'll be fine, I just thought a 275 would be 20mm wider than a 255, but in reality, they are only 8mm wider (section width) and the tread might be a whole 2mm wider. Just weird...

Last edited by hiz-n-herz; 10-18-2007 at 07:28 PM.
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
275 mm tires are 20 mm wider that 255 mm tires. That’s a fact.
I wish that were true... apparently it's not...
Old 10-18-2007 | 07:25 PM
  #13  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash

OK, OK....

Pic ho's


Which is the 275?


It's mostly just taller, not much wider:


Not much different. Doesn't look 20mm wider:


Let's take a hard look:


OK; four nickels and a dime (is that 20mm?)


Well, let's just check... Where's my other 12mm I paid for?


The sidewalls; haven't touched that ruler in 10 years :

Last edited by hiz-n-herz; 10-18-2007 at 07:27 PM.
Old 10-18-2007 | 07:33 PM
  #14  
zman1910's Avatar
zman1910
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

LOL...thats awesome

Just install and enjoy them....it's still 8mm wider
Old 10-18-2007 | 07:52 PM
  #15  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by hiz-n-herz
OK, OK....

Pic ho's


Which is the 275?

The one one the right is the 275.

In the other pics, you're lining them up dead center and measuring the difference on one side, of course that will only be 10mm (which is only .4")!!!!!

I still don't see what you're questioning. They look right. There's also the distinct possibility that the difference in wheel widths is making them "look" equal based on the stretch on the sidewalls.
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:04 PM
  #16  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
The one one the right is the 275.

In the other pics, you're lining them up dead center and measuring the difference on one side, of course that will only be 10mm (which is only .4")!!!!!

I still don't see what you're questioning. They look right. There's also the distinct possibility that the difference in wheel widths is making them "look" equal based on the stretch on the sidewalls.
On the measurement pics, they are both laying flat on my patio table, nit lined up center-to-center.

Still only 8mm different, but I paid for 20mm...
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:07 PM
  #17  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by zman1910
LOL...thats awesome

Just install and enjoy them....it's still 8mm wider

Yeah, wife says I must be tweakin!

She'll enjoy them. She's presently running OEM 225/245 (re040) on her after-market wheels so this'll be a nice step up. At least handling should be well-balanced!

Not too worried about clearance either. We'll post pics when it's done.
Old 10-18-2007 | 08:27 PM
  #18  
Voboy's Avatar
Voboy
New Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
The one one the right is the 275.

In the other pics, you're lining them up dead center and measuring the difference on one side, of course that will only be 10mm (which is only .4")!!!!!

I still don't see what you're questioning. They look right. There's also the distinct possibility that the difference in wheel widths is making them "look" equal based on the stretch on the sidewalls.
+1
Old 10-18-2007 | 10:25 PM
  #19  
hiz-n-herz's Avatar
hiz-n-herz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: SF South Bay area
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
There's also the distinct possibility that the difference in wheel widths is making them "look" equal based on the stretch on the sidewalls.
Well, They're not mounted yet...

I'll post back when they're on the wheels and on the car...
Old 10-19-2007 | 12:19 AM
  #20  
r_seng's Avatar
r_seng
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 0
From: SoCal 626
Default

of course the 275 is wider. the majority fitment for tires here on the boards are 245 front and 275 rear. that is why the 275 look significantly wider when compared to a 245.


Quick Reply: 255/40 = 275/40 ... Wtf?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.