Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Official Aggressive Wheels & Fat Tires Thread

Old Jul 20, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #4041  
danhfvcsd's Avatar
danhfvcsd
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast, Australia
Default

Always loved this thread - got the idea for my rims and tyres here!

Rims - Volk CE28N Genesis
Fronts - 19x9.5 +22
Rears - 19x10.5 +22

Tyres - Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Fronts - 265/35/19
Rears - 305/30/19

No VDC Issues, little bit of scraping over bumps at speed on the rear where the rear quarter meets the back of the rear bar tho, even after flaring guards about 13mm and having them rolled...
My weirdest issue is that when i turn left at carpark speeds, the right tyre rubs the inner plastic guard well, but only on the right side??? Hasnt been a major issue for me, so havent looked into it very much yet lol
Not sure how low i am tho, but i'd say its probably pretty close to oem... running BC BR coils (made em an inch shorter than stock shocks before installation) and camber is all oem, or close to it...

Name:  56bfb47e.jpg
Views: 371
Size:  132.1 KB
Name:  9b69da4a.jpg
Views: 408
Size:  148.9 KB
Name:  97864da3.jpg
Views: 425
Size:  111.4 KB

Last edited by danhfvcsd; Jul 21, 2012 at 12:02 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 03:27 PM
  #4042  
tbruner's Avatar
tbruner
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 599
Likes: 1
From: SLO, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Alex, I say go with a 255/40 & 285/40 to start. Could go fatter on the rear with a 305/30.

Play with this calculator; http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp
I cannot figure this calculator out...

Last edited by tbruner; Jul 20, 2012 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 05:20 PM
  #4043  
-Trav-'s Avatar
-Trav-
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 2
From: Mountain View, CA
Default

Put your oem or current wheel size in the left box, and the new size in the right. The calculator will compare the two wheel/tire sizes to give you an idea of how itll fit.

Theres a similar calculator at the top of this page. Look for the big blue link.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #4044  
Nate08Z's Avatar
Nate08Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Usa-MA
Default

Originally Posted by tioga
Just go with 18x10 on all 4 corners. Really you should do 11 in the back but if you only want 10 then do that on all 4.
I got 18x10 in front with 265 35 and back 11 with a 295 35. With just a roll and i am low and have no problems.
For you just do 265 and for back 285 35

What offset you thinking of?
they only make these in 18x8.5 or 18x10, they come in +25 offset i think, cant i go with 40s on the profile tho? i want the wheels a lil beefyer since its gona be 18''s

my car looks like this


want it looking like this
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 12:01 AM
  #4045  
danhfvcsd's Avatar
danhfvcsd
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Gold Coast, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by danhfvcsd
Rims - Volk CE28N Genesis
Fronts - 19x9.5 +22
Rears - 19x10.5 +22
oops!!! 10.5 rears lol
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #4046  
tioga's Avatar
tioga
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: K/W. ontario, canada
Default

Originally Posted by Nate08Z

want it looking like this
Those don't look like 40s. But ya your best bet is to use the calculator. Cause also honestly my factory wheels on my 08 Nismo in the rear... 19x10 with 265/35 potenzas look a lot thinner then my new 18x11 with 295/35 bfgoodrich that look a lot taller then I expected. So it has a lot to do with the tire brand you select... some have that fat look some don't.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #4047  
Zhinobi's Avatar
Zhinobi
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Default

Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 08:35 PM
  #4048  
lgear080's Avatar
lgear080
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

you guys park wayyyyy toooo close... eeek.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 10:44 PM
  #4049  
EmpireDude's Avatar
EmpireDude
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: 937 Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by tioga
Those don't look like 40s. But ya your best bet is to use the calculator. Cause also honestly my factory wheels on my 08 Nismo in the rear... 19x10 with 265/35 potenzas look a lot thinner then my new 18x11 with 295/35 bfgoodrich that look a lot taller then I expected. So it has a lot to do with the tire brand you select... some have that fat look some don't.
Please ignore me if you already knew this, just something I learned the other day on a flight reading motortrend or some car magazine of the like. The 35 actually denotes that the sidewall height is 35% of the tires width. While I agree different brand tires run different sizes for the same advertised size (one brands 285/35 vs. another's) a 265/35 should have a sidewall height of 92.75 mm while a 295/35's should be 103.25...

If you knew this, then please call me a dummy or whatever else! I just figured I'd post up the info in case anyone like me had been misinformed. I thought a 35 sidewall was the same height regardless of width!

Keep posting up the fat tires guys, loving the pics!

Name:  Screenshot2012-06-10at125742AM.png
Views: 395
Size:  319.5 KB
Name:  Screenshot2012-06-10at12000AM.png
Views: 402
Size:  322.5 KB
Name:  Screenshot2012-06-10at11735AM.png
Views: 382
Size:  328.6 KB
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 12:10 AM
  #4050  
SE5spd's Avatar
SE5spd
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 0
From: around
Default

^ interesting autox course. Full road course with cones?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 03:37 AM
  #4051  
taywan's Avatar
taywan
Registered User
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 4
From: G'ville SC
Default

Yea empire- its called the aspect ratio of the first number.
295/30/20
295x.30=88.5 tall
You're not a dummy. A lot of pple don't know that.
Cool shots!!!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 02:55 PM
  #4052  
Esser's Avatar
Esser
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 499
Likes: 23
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Originally Posted by taywan
Yea empire- its called the aspect ratio of the first number.
295/30/20
295x.30=88.5 tall
You're not a dummy. A lot of pple don't know that.
Cool shots!!!
Even some tire shops didn't know that here is St. Louis.... I had to explain that it was a percentage. They thought i was high when i told them that.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 03:14 PM
  #4053  
SE5spd's Avatar
SE5spd
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 0
From: around
Default

lol ^ I'd literally laugh at them.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #4054  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,121
Likes: 2,400
From: Sin City
Default

Originally Posted by Esser
Even some tire shops didn't know that here is St. Louis.... I had to explain that it was a percentage. They thought i was high when i told them that.
Run into that many times too. I believe it has also been mentioned in this thread a few times.

I remember when I was 17 and believed the aspect ratio was 50 and meant 50mm
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #4055  
Nate08Z's Avatar
Nate08Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Usa-MA
Default

Originally Posted by EmpireDude
Please ignore me if you already knew this, just something I learned the other day on a flight reading motortrend or some car magazine of the like. The 35 actually denotes that the sidewall height is 35% of the tires width. While I agree different brand tires run different sizes for the same advertised size (one brands 285/35 vs. another's) a 265/35 should have a sidewall height of 92.75 mm while a 295/35's should be 103.25...

If you knew this, then please call me a dummy or whatever else! I just figured I'd post up the info in case anyone like me had been misinformed. I thought a 35 sidewall was the same height regardless of width!

Keep posting up the fat tires guys, loving the pics!



i didnt knoww this!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2012 | 06:17 PM
  #4056  
royblackwood's Avatar
royblackwood
New Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

so boring everbody knows what 1 " more offset gives you lets see some 24" or 29" tires something diff ...........God bless Roy
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 06:49 AM
  #4057  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by taywan
Yea empire- its called the aspect ratio of the first number.
295/30/20
295x.30=88.5 tall
You're not a dummy. A lot of pple don't know that.
Cool shots!!!
Originally Posted by Esser
Even some tire shops didn't know that here is St. Louis.... I had to explain that it was a percentage. They thought i was high when i told them that.
Looks like you have the general idea, however, maybe this will clarify a bit, and people won't need "online tire calculators" to figure out the height of tires:

295/30/20: The first number is the (approximate) tire width given by the manufacturer in mm. The second number is - as you've said - the aspect ratio, and the third number is the height of the opening (for the wheel) in inches.

295*.3 = 88.5mm, but there is sidewall on both the top and the bottom of the tire, so the total sidewall is 177mm.

177cm * 1" / 25.4cm = 6.97" of total sidewall.

7" of sidewall + 20" wheel opening = 26.97" tall tire. (Stock 245/45/18 rear is 26.68" tall, so this is a touch taller by about 1%.

Last edited by scotts300; Jul 24, 2012 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 07:18 AM
  #4058  
-Trav-'s Avatar
-Trav-
New Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 2
From: Mountain View, CA
Default

Originally Posted by royblackwood
so boring everbody knows what 1 " more offset gives you lets see some 24" or 29" tires something diff ...........God bless Roy
You make no God damn sense.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2012 | 10:03 PM
  #4059  
EmpireDude's Avatar
EmpireDude
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: 937 Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SE5spd
^ interesting autox course. Full road course with cones?
It's a banked oval with an infield! Kind of a neat place, it's really neat to drive on the banking.



http://youtu.be/rid9mioqjxg http://youtu.be/EKK5_VrzH2M
Originally Posted by taywan
Yea empire- its called the aspect ratio of the first number.
295/30/20
295x.30=88.5 tall
You're not a dummy. A lot of pple don't know that.
Cool shots!!!
Thanks!
Originally Posted by scotts300
Looks like you have the general idea, however, maybe this will clarify a bit, and people won't need "online tire calculators" to figure out the height of tires:

295/30/20: The first number is the (approximate) tire width given by the manufacturer in cm. The second number is - as you've said - the aspect ratio, and the third number is the height of the opening (for the wheel) in inches.

295*.3 = 88.5cm, but there is sidewall on both the top and the bottom of the tire, so the total sidewall is 177cm.

177cm * 1" / 25.4cm = 6.97" of total sidewall.

7" of sidewall + 20" wheel opening = 26.97" tall tire. (Stock 245/45/18 rear is 26.68" tall, so this is a touch taller by about 1%.
perfect, except I believe you mean mm rather than cm I don't mean to come off as a smart ***, just was gonna correct your units and conversion. an 88.5 cm sidewall would be huge

Originally Posted by royblackwood
so boring everbody knows what 1 " more offset gives you lets see some 24" or 29" tires something diff ...........God bless Roy

Originally Posted by -Trav-
You make no God damn sense.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2012 | 09:27 AM
  #4060  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by EmpireDude

perfect, except I believe you mean mm rather than cm

Absolutely (the conversion with 25.4mm/inch was correct at least!)
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM.