Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Anyone with 10.5 width rears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2003 | 06:13 PM
  #1  
SHO-TIME's Avatar
SHO-TIME
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,322
Likes: 2
From: Tokyo, Japan
Question Anyone with 10.5 width rears?

I'm looking to get 18's and the vendor who contacted me told me that they have 9.5 for the front and 10.5 in the rear. I have a feeling 10.5 might be a bit too wide for my personal taste but I would like to hear your experiences.

So, to those with 10.5 width in the rear, I have a couple of questions:

1. Any fender rolling required?
2. What size tires are you running?
3. Do you feel sluggishness due to wider tires?

Thanks in advance!!
(If this topic was beaten to death already, I apologise.... I'd appreciate it if someone can point me to the right thread.)
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
havabooz's Avatar
havabooz
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: brooklyn ny(rutgers college)
Default

+35 offset supposedly doesnt need rolling...anything lower need rolling...but it surely has been done
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #3  
MATIX's Avatar
MATIX
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Default

I"m running 19x10.5" in the rear which definitely needs fender rolling. I'm running 275/35/19 tires in the rear, which is the same as I was running on my 9.5"s in the rear before, so thers no sluggishness.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 09:12 AM
  #4  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

The width does not operate in a vacuum though, so not all 10.5 inch rears need rolling. We have done this combo before, and with the right wheel, on the right offset, it works 100% perfectly, no rolling needed.

Matix's rear needed rolling due to the offset (see his signature).
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
5thgenluder's Avatar
5thgenluder
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: chicago
Default

i have 10.5s in the rear with a +35 offset. no rolling required but im at stock height.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 09:17 PM
  #6  
SHO-TIME's Avatar
SHO-TIME
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,322
Likes: 2
From: Tokyo, Japan
Default

5thgenluder:

What size tires are you running? 275's? Any sluggishness?????

I'm asking this b/c when I swapped my stock 245's in the rear with 275's before, my car drove extremely slower than when I had the 245's on. But I mounted wider tires on the stock 8" wide wheels. I'm wondering if this will change if I get wider and lighter wheels.

Also, how do they sit relative to the fender? Flush? or tucked in?
BTW, do you own a Gen 5 Prelude?? I used to have a 97.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #7  
MATIX's Avatar
MATIX
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by SLVR Z

Also, how do they sit relative to the fender? Flush? or tucked in?
If you want the wheels to sit flush you need to go with a lower offset , something in hte low 20's, but then you'll need to roll the fender
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 05:09 AM
  #8  
daytona350z's Avatar
daytona350z
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
From: newport beach. so cal
Default

if your on the stock suspension, do you still need rolling for a +22 on a 10.5?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
NEADmike's Avatar
NEADmike
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by daytona350z
if your on the stock suspension, do you still need rolling for a +22 on a 10.5?
Yes.

However, I think people are getting this offset situation confused. Every single offset for every single wheel is different. For instance a +22 on a 19x10.5 TE37 is not the same as a +22 offset on a 19x10.5 GT-C, they are all different because of wheel construction. So when people in this post say they have 10.5 inch wheels that needed fender rolling, I am assuming they do not have TE37's in 19x10.5 with a +35, because this is the only setup I know of that does not need any sort of modification to fit.

Best regards,

Mike
NorthEast Auto Design
www.ForPerformance.com
www.NorthEastAutoDesign.com
1.800.296.6560 ext. 202
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #10  
Mr B's Avatar
Mr B
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Just another guy...
Default

11 in the rear and needed rolling. No rubbing in the back whatsoever and it's slammed.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 10:30 AM
  #11  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

We have put the wheels the poster is considering on a car before - 10.5 rear, no rubbing whatsoever, no rolling needed. A TE is much more fixed in its sizing, since its a 1 piece wheel - the wheels in question are a 3 piece unit, so other factors are involved. What Mike said above is dead on correct - it varies by wheel. Also guys you have to remember tires as well - not all tires ion the same size are truly the same size - some are narrower, some are wider, even though they are exactly the same size. For the car we did, it wore P Zero Asymetrico's, no issues at all.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 02:37 PM
  #12  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

I got 10.5 rears and 9.5 fts with 295 & 265 fts. Lowered 1" all 4 corners with B&G springs. No rubbing, no rolled fenders. HRE wheels.....
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #13  
MY350Z.COM's Avatar
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 2
Default

Originally posted by zland
I got 10.5 rears and 9.5 fts with 295 & 265 fts. Lowered 1" all 4 corners with B&G springs. No rubbing, no rolled fenders. HRE wheels.....
what offsets?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #14  
arvin's Avatar
arvin
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: Northern Kalipornia
Default

Got 11's with 295 width. No rolling, no rubbing. Stock height
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 05:38 AM
  #15  
wakaZ's Avatar
wakaZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: HNL
Default

Originally posted by arvin
Got 11's with 295 width. No rolling, no rubbing. Stock height
Dang...where's da pics???

11's /295's...that's gotta look sick!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
Apr 28, 2017 09:00 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 PM.