Do you guys think 19x9.5 all around will work?
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by HaNkYs_Z
Do you think I need to roll my front fenders if I go with 19x9.5 +22? and how will the handling be compare to 19x8.5? any difference?
Do you think I need to roll my front fenders if I go with 19x9.5 +22? and how will the handling be compare to 19x8.5? any difference?
Last edited by Rayden2001; 06-23-2004 at 10:11 PM.
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: aesthetically unpleasing
Originally posted by RIVET
I've seen this done and it looks.....well, crappy. The Z/G needs staggard wheel widths (i.e 9.5/10.5) or the rears look wrong.
I've seen this done and it looks.....well, crappy. The Z/G needs staggard wheel widths (i.e 9.5/10.5) or the rears look wrong.
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by tig488
ive got 19x9.5 all around on my G35, got them from a guy who had them on his z, +35 front and +22 rear, running 275/35s all around without any problems or rubbing.
ive got 19x9.5 all around on my G35, got them from a guy who had them on his z, +35 front and +22 rear, running 275/35s all around without any problems or rubbing.
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Z1 Performance
why would you do this though (unless someone has the wheels laying around)?. The staggered widths are FAR easier to get a hold of than staggered offsets.
why would you do this though (unless someone has the wheels laying around)?. The staggered widths are FAR easier to get a hold of than staggered offsets.
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Z1 Performance
why would you do this though (unless someone has the wheels laying around)?. The staggered widths are FAR easier to get a hold of than staggered offsets.
why would you do this though (unless someone has the wheels laying around)?. The staggered widths are FAR easier to get a hold of than staggered offsets.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a newbie question about all of this. If the stock 18" wheel offset is the same (30 F/R), why would you have to have different offsets F/R with new rims of the same size all around?
I like the Enkei PK-6 18x9.5, and I was thinking of putting these all around. Any comments, suggestions?
thanks,
Aaron
I like the Enkei PK-6 18x9.5, and I was thinking of putting these all around. Any comments, suggestions?
thanks,
Aaron
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sport compact car got better results w/ a non staggered setup, 274/40/18 front and rear (18x9 bbs wheels i think) and pulled a 1.0 lateral g!! also going w/ a non staggered setup may might eliminate the understeer
i was going to post a thread asking for people who have had both staggered and non staggered setup to give some input, but i figured i'd do a search first
p.s. 245's on a 9.5" wheel will probably fit, but will be stretched as hell... and the contact patch will not be any different then if you were to go w/ a 8.5" wheel w/ the recommended 245 width
i was going to post a thread asking for people who have had both staggered and non staggered setup to give some input, but i figured i'd do a search first
p.s. 245's on a 9.5" wheel will probably fit, but will be stretched as hell... and the contact patch will not be any different then if you were to go w/ a 8.5" wheel w/ the recommended 245 width
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tm9293
Wheels Tires
1
09-11-2015 02:45 PM