Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

I've got 05 Track dyno results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default I've got 05 Track dyno results!

Here are the results of my 05 track dyno. It was done at Performance Garage in Smyrna, TN with a dynojet. My car has 2400 miles on it. If you look at the bottom of the chart it has the a/f ratio listed.

http://community.webshots.com/photo/...21123818VBbbZi

Last edited by thawk408; Apr 12, 2005 at 12:10 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #2  
axxizzer's Avatar
axxizzer
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: you'd Like to know
Default

Aaaagh, Red Effing X


EDIT: you edit much too fast for me.

Excellent

255whp
235wtq

thats almost 20 more HP than MY car....sadness

Last edited by axxizzer; Apr 12, 2005 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #3  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Try now.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #4  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Thats nice, I did 242 whp 240 ft lbs. You def have more hp, but Im surprised you didnt lose more TQ-being 16 ft lbs down @ the FW. Nice top-end pull, now get it to the track. BTW is this SAE corrected or STD ??
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Its SAE
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #6  
350zWarz's Avatar
350zWarz
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: RVA
Default

nice results man, had to save that graph for future reference
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #7  
zillinois's Avatar
zillinois
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,345
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
Default

Great numbers, looks like that 300hp is legit. What smoothing factor did you use on the graph.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
hfm's Avatar
hfm
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,527
Likes: 1
From: The Val
Default

You know, aside from one drum dynojet where I hit 269 rwhp, with intake, testpipes, exhaust, my normal dynojet results look right about the same. The biggest differences are the 7,200 rpm cut-off and the 35th has about 10 ft/lbs fewer torque.

Are your shift points the same at 30 mph and 60 mph for 1st and 2nd gears respectively. I sure would like to do a few head-to-head runs against a stock 35th anniversary edition.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by zillinois
Great numbers, looks like that 300hp is legit. What smoothing factor did you use on the graph.
We used 3. He said this was the most common.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #10  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by hfm
You know, aside from one drum dynojet where I hit 269 rwhp, with intake, testpipes, exhaust, my normal dynojet results look right about the same.
We compared mine to a stock 03 and you could see how the new engine at 6000rpm carries almost the exact same HP all the way to redline. Also the 03 torque curve dropped sooner.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #11  
Amnbex's Avatar
Amnbex
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Langhorne, Pennsylvania
Default

WOW!!!

That's a flat TQ curve.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #12  
Art Vandaleigh's Avatar
Art Vandaleigh
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Default

Nice, finally a dyno chart to silence the critics.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #13  
orhanz33's Avatar
orhanz33
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
Default

can someone post a stock dyno of a 03-04 Z so we can compare the torque curves?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #14  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by orhanz33
can someone post a stock dyno of a 03-04 Z so we can compare the torque curves?
I wish I had asked him to print out the comparision that we were looking at...
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #15  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Heres mine with JWT pop charger and y pipe back exhaust...

Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #16  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

everyone is scrutinizing over minor differences

13 crank hp isn't that big of a deal - even for tracking with it up in the power band

A set of crawford headers, and ECU flash will get you there
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #17  
thawk408's Avatar
thawk408
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
everyone is scrutinizing over minor differences

13 crank hp isn't that big of a deal - even for tracking with it up in the power band

A set of crawford headers, and ECU flash will get you there
It is not about the peak numbers. And I dont think anyone is scrutinizing, just compareing the 2.

Last edited by thawk408; Apr 12, 2005 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #18  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
It is not about the peak numbers.

who said it was?

it's not like the 05 track engine generates 13 hp across the board

I was saying, I think crawford headers and an ECU flash will give you a similar power curve

Last edited by sentry65; Apr 12, 2005 at 04:36 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #19  
dan-14's Avatar
dan-14
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Default

thanks for posting your dyno results . aslo, how did you choose to do your break in?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #20  
sokudo9l6's Avatar
sokudo9l6
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

+1
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM.