Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Another thread about TCS and VDC (but different)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2007 | 07:55 PM
  #1  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 203
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default Another thread about TCS and VDC (but different)

The already active thread “Traction Control” is very good reading. Lot's of good information there.

I have another question about VDC. I need to preface the discussion with this information: My only experience on this question is with 2003 and 2004 350Z’s. I do not know if this is applicable to 2005-2006 350Z’s since I did not evaluate these models.

Discussion: The first Z I drove was a 2003 Enthusiast model (this configuration had TLC but not VDC), and I was impressed. It was a great car with a great engine and suspension. My only criticism was the slow drop in RPMs (engine-hanging) while shifting. Otherwise, it was perfect for me.

A few months later I drove a 2003 Z Performance model (that is equipped with VDC). There was a very noticeable difference in the power-assisted equipment (clutch, brakes, and steering) on the Performance model with VDC. The clutch, brakes, and steering on the VDC equipped Performance model were much lighter and felt a whole lot better than on the TLC equipped Enthusiast model. I pointed this out to the dealer who told me I was seeing ghosts (same car with nearly same equipment, should be no difference in the power assisted equipment). Then I took a 2003 Track model (which also has VDC) for a test drive. Same thing: Similar to the Performance model and a lighter feel on the brakes, clutch, and power steering than the Enthusiast model. Thinking the Enthusiast model I was driving was an aberration (suffering from heavy-feeling power assisted equipment), I did a test drive on a different Enthusiast. The newly tested Enthusiast model was exactly like the Enthusiast I was driving (with the same feel of the power-assisted equipment that was not as smooth and light as the VDC equipped Performance model and Track model).

So you know what I did. I got a Performance model. Since then I have had the opportunity to drive a couple of other 2003 Enthusiast models, and the same is true: Power-assisted equipment is not as light and pleasant as on my Performance model.

What’s going on here? Do VDC equipped-models have a higher hydraulic boost? Are the more expensive models different? I have no idea. Again, my comparison is only on 2003 models. I wonder if the same is true for 2005-2006 models. --Spike

Last edited by Spike100; 01-05-2007 at 08:03 PM.
Old 01-05-2007 | 08:33 PM
  #2  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

No
Old 01-05-2007 | 09:14 PM
  #3  
Spike100's Avatar
Spike100
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 203
From: Edina, Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by HyperSprite
No
I notice that this Forum tracks postings and I see you have what... 2K+ postings. I don't think this should count as a post.

... Just kidding --Spike

...And thanks for bumping

Last edited by Spike100; 01-05-2007 at 10:12 PM.
Old 01-06-2007 | 06:19 AM
  #4  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Might be some slight difference between cars, depending on production dates.

I'd look at the alignement and wheels for the difference in feel.
Old 01-06-2007 | 06:29 AM
  #5  
DROPPEDIT2WCE's Avatar
DROPPEDIT2WCE
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air, MD
Default

performance model 18" wheels = lower sidewall tires, same as track model. better steering feel, less body roll that a touring model with 17" wheels and taller sidewalls. either way the models are very similar.
Old 01-06-2007 | 06:43 AM
  #6  
Jes-Z's Avatar
Jes-Z
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,030
Likes: 0
From: THE MIA
Default

I have a performanc model. The 18's vs. 17's sounds like a good explaination, but I did notice a difference compared to Base and Ethus. Models. Only thing that I find is that VDC inhibit Horses. I dynoed my car stock in Texas. Mustang Dyno, 91 Octane, 4,000 Feet ASL. 229 was my number. I took of the VDC in the next run and I got 236. I'm not sure why but it happend. On top of that when Taking off from a stop the car boggs if you gun it. VDC doing it's job stopping you from peeling out. So the car feels a little slower if I'm running with VDC on. I turn it off and it feels a bit stronger.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loudtoyz
Engine & Drivetrain
8
04-06-2023 05:52 AM
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 07:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
04-22-2021 10:42 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
09-27-2015 04:40 PM



Quick Reply: Another thread about TCS and VDC (but different)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.