Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Ceramic Disk pads vs Hawks HPS. Which would be better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
Naples176's Avatar
Naples176
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Npales, Fl
Question Ceramic Disk pads vs Hawks HPS. Which would be better?

I am going to replace the stock front pads with either a ceramic pad (from TireRack) or HPS but do not know which would be better. My 350ZR is a daily driver and want to be able to see the front wheels for more than one day after I wash the car! I am looking for replacements pads that will brake at least as well as the stock pads and will be as quiet, but have a LOT LESS brake dust! Any thoughts will be appreciated.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 10:41 PM
  #2  
ssk0771's Avatar
ssk0771
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada, So CAL
Default

From what I know, ceremic pads are quiter and are easier on the rotors with good bite. I use to have Satisfied Ceremic Pads on my previous Z before I switched to Hawk HPS. From my experiance, Satisfied Ceremic was pretty good. I am going to try Akebono or Hawk Ceremic nextime too. I like Hawk HPS because it has very low brake dust but as for the bite, its about same as stock. I am greatful that I don't have any brake noise but I saw lots of people who are complainting about Hawk HPS because of the brake noise. If you decide to try the Ceremic, please keep us posted.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 07:46 AM
  #3  
rclab1's Avatar
rclab1
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: SyracuseCampus
Default Hawk HPS

Get the HPS ,
just break em in properly and it wont squeak
plus tell the technician (or you if you install yourself)
to put extra grease.....on the pads....

It is 10x better than the OEM pads in terms of
No (hardly) any Break Dust.....

100% improvement in my opinion as a daily driver....
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #4  
Naples176's Avatar
Naples176
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Npales, Fl
Default

Is it okay to just change the front pads or should I change both? I was thinking of changing only the front as they do most of the braking.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 10:33 AM
  #5  
roydiculous's Avatar
roydiculous
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Default

I've done just the front and are very satisfied... althought when it does dust, isn't not gunmetal, it's this brown dust . I'd say save your $$ and just do the front.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #6  
RedBird's Avatar
RedBird
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: East Cost
Default

I had a problem with brake dust on the drivers side front wheel, but after I took it in for regular service which included a brake adjustment, I no longer have the problem.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #7  
DaddyPhatSaks's Avatar
DaddyPhatSaks
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Default

I changed my fronts to EBC greenstuff....Hardly no dust, no squeeks or anything. Well worth $60 buks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
Oct 29, 2020 07:44 PM
hajwoj
Autocross/Road
27
Nov 1, 2015 05:25 PM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM.