Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

350Z Spyder (not official)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 12:34 AM
  #2  
JamieH's Avatar
JamieH
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default Convertible

The thinbg that worrys me about the convertible is that I think the best looking part of the Z is the back end, and obvioulsly the convertible is going to look different.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 01:03 AM
  #3  
Brad4rdHay's Avatar
Brad4rdHay
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

For what it's worth, here's my deal. First, while the performance is definately there, the roadster version could suffer in a few ways, not quite being up to snuff to the competition or the origional 350z itself. One, the most dramatic part of the Z is its sweeping roof line that comes to the aggressife crease at the end. This is what gives the car its fast look and really sums up the "cutting edge" performance and style of the whole car in one simple line...remove it, as the above pic shows, the car looks more like just generic. The other possible disadvantage is that the Boxter and Stook, which both look great, were designed as roadsters from the beginning, where the 350z is just a modified coupe. Now we havn't seen anything final yet so I shouldn't make that call just yet, cause Nissan could blow us away with the spyder, just like they did with the coupe. I hope that Nissan doesnt just go the easy, least expensive route of simply cutting off the roof...but well see in a few months.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 01:23 AM
  #4  
john0213's Avatar
john0213
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Canada
Default

having more choice is a good news to me though, as some people enjoy havin no top than looking at the back, it's a good news to the future customer~but then not me, cuz i don't like it anyways~
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 02:28 AM
  #5  
Goober's Avatar
Goober
Charter Member #57
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

Another car that doesn't look nearly as good in convertible form in my opinion. That doesn't even account for when the top is up.

The only ones that I have seen that look very good are the ones built to be a roadster with the top off in the first place and can add hard tops.

Looks like the roofline on the Z will be a little tricky for a sunroof.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2002 | 06:49 AM
  #6  
alear's Avatar
alear
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Bozeman, Montana
Default

I am waiting patiently for the convertible and I would disagree with the previous posts. Now, the above picture looks a little odd but it is just a artificial drawing. I believe most cars look better in roadster form. If the Toyota MR2, Boxster, Z3, or S2000 had sloping hard roofs I don't think they would have the special roadster look. I usually like it when the folded back roof sits up a little bit, like the Porsche 911 or the S2000 with the boot on it. The modded pictures always have it sitting flat. I believe it will still look good. See below
Attached Thumbnails 350Z Spyder (not official)-backtoback.jpg  

Last edited by alear; Jun 24, 2002 at 06:57 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Dsowe
Exterior & Interior
15
Feb 17, 2021 10:38 AM
issyz
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
6
Jul 2, 2017 03:04 PM
LunchBox20
SoCal Marketplace
4
Oct 20, 2015 10:22 PM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 AM.