53/47 weight distributation? i thought it was 51/49!
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
53/47 weight distributation? i thought it was 51/49!
http://www.nissanusa.com/vehicles/ModelSpecifications/0,,120017|120563|,00.html
please imform me on the change because the little dvd that came with my car says that my car has a 51/49 weight distributiation.
]\ 03 enthusiast mt
thanks in advance
please imform me on the change because the little dvd that came with my car says that my car has a 51/49 weight distributiation.
]\ 03 enthusiast mt
thanks in advance
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard even with the rb26dett engine swap when they put it lower and farther back that it was "closer to a 50/50" .. so it couldn't have started with 51/49 and still be lacking perfect 50/50 after that. I'd believe 53/47 was more true.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cerritos, CA
Posts: 14,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's 53/47, but since it's FR, acceleration basically does a weight transfer to the rear tires. Also, the FM platform means that both the engine and the fuel tank are closer to the center of gravity, so it's not as hard to transfer weight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Extreme Dimensions
Southern California
0
09-24-2015 03:35 PM