Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

MSN Autos expert review...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #1  
koolzero's Avatar
koolzero
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default MSN Autos expert review...

is very low! They gave it a 7 where as the user review is a 9.5. I just found this kind of surprising. I thought the expert reviews from when the 350z first came out was quite a bit higher.

Here's the link: http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/ex...mid=-1&src=vip

Did they change their minds?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
Fletch69z's Avatar
Fletch69z
Registered User
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Haha, have they ever driven the car on a twisty road and compared prices to anything that compares performance wise?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #4  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by mc350z
those cons are stupid

picture someone saying


yeah i would have bought one but the "Wide, heavy doors" kept me away

+1 hahah experts my ***. A two year old kid has more sense than that guy.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #5  
azjimbo's Avatar
azjimbo
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Az.
Default

Did you read the full review? A 25th Anniversary model? Did this clown do his homework at all. Wide heavy doors? That's a first. Lack of storage space? That cracks me up. It is a 2 seat sports car!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #6  
usmanasif's Avatar
usmanasif
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 1
From: Mile High City
Default

Look at that 9.5 user rating for the truth: The Z is a driver's car.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #7  
EdgeOfSanity's Avatar
EdgeOfSanity
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 1
From: Breckenridge, Co
Default

whoever they got to review that is a moron. Those are the worst cons i've ever heard for reviewing a car.
1. its a sports car, its going to have a stiff clutch
2. wide heavy doors? does the reviewer have the build of a petite woman?
3. little cargo space? its a sports car dumbass
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #8  
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, Ca.
Default

Man, that was a bad review.

Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #9  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

man the cons are bull****..
clutch is perfect
doors is kind of big but its a coupe
cargo space? its a sports coupe for fack's sake!
if ya cant make simple sacrifices like cargo space why not just get a honda accord instead!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #10  
Miko's Avatar
Miko
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Hahah lame old Dan...a 7 just b/c of cargo and long doors...like what the?
I'd understand 8.5 or a 9 but 7 is like
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 06:09 AM
  #11  
spacemn_spiff's Avatar
spacemn_spiff
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Originally Posted by The Brickyard Rat
Man, that was a bad review.

+1
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 06:37 AM
  #12  
SC4life's Avatar
SC4life
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

That was a useless review. It's nothing short of someone walking into a Nissan dealership, get into and out of the Z (while in the showroom), went home and scribble up this review. The CONS list is absurd, not sure if he was expecting a mini-van. Plus starting the article off w/ a serious error gives the review(er) absolutely no credibility.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #13  
tropicalypso's Avatar
tropicalypso
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 2
From: www.BooostedImports.com
Default

I drove an F body firebird back about 8-9 years ago... THAT had some big, heavy doors. The Z's aren't that cumbersome.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:24 AM
  #14  
only1's Avatar
only1
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

I posted this in another thread, but there is a great review for the new 2006 z:
http://www.thecarconnection.com/Vehi...184.A9377.html
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:26 AM
  #15  
arejohn's Avatar
arejohn
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: durham, NC
Default

When I purchased a Vette, these guys were down in it for having a small trunk. There criteria does not match mine.

Notice the high score for acceleration and accident avoidance and low score for fuel mileage.

If we followed their advice we would all be driving Accords and Camrys.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
burglapfd
Maintenance & Repair
9
Dec 6, 2020 01:04 PM
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
Extreme Dimensions
Southern California
0
Sep 24, 2015 03:35 PM
carid
Misc.
0
Sep 10, 2015 06:16 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM.