Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

What's weakest performance thing about 350Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2005, 09:20 AM
  #21  
sp1derm00
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
sp1derm00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea... im just waiting for that one azzhole kid that keys my entire car to come along so i can claim insurance and get my DREAM paint.
Old 10-13-2005, 09:22 AM
  #22  
Ztalker
Registered User
 
Ztalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
I agree, if the Z was around 2,800lbs it would be so much more fun then it is already now. And everyone I have talked to has agreed that the Z comes with great non-brembo brakes. I have a friend who tracks his Z all summer and he doesn't have brembo brakes. He is ususally at the tops of the standings.
ditto......your absolutely right.. .....the Z's standard factory brakes had excellent rating according to R&T, it was rated at 114ft. from 60 to 0. The G35 couple factory brakes was even better at 112ft. As a matter of fact, the G35 beats the ferrari F430 by a foot from 60 to 0. Nissan's factory brakes are second to none in the industry....according to Motortrend...their behemoth SUV Armada stops 20ft shorter (130ft.)from 60 to 0 than GM's Hummer H2 (150ft.)
Old 10-13-2005, 09:24 AM
  #23  
FairLady32
Registered User
 
FairLady32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: saugus
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hahaha this guy made me laugh!! hahaha yaaa put on some brembos maaan then ur car will be fun!! haha their stop times are 2 feet apart!! YA 2 FEETT !! HAHA THATS TONS OF FUN !!
Old 10-13-2005, 09:26 AM
  #24  
HOMiEZ
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
HOMiEZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 448
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

in just about 99% of sports car out there the weight is probably always the weaking peformance attribute
Old 10-13-2005, 09:26 AM
  #25  
ANXIOUZ
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ANXIOUZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.

Last edited by ANXIOUZ; 10-13-2005 at 09:29 AM.
Old 10-13-2005, 09:30 AM
  #26  
Joeys_z
Registered User
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joeys_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Z = Porky Pig

The weight is the biggest issue!
Old 10-13-2005, 09:34 AM
  #27  
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
gabez33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SATX
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Definatley the POS bose crap bullsh*t and the AC!!
My maxima's ac was ridiculously cold, you could see it blowing out the vents
Old 10-13-2005, 09:42 AM
  #28  
Miko
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Miko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh yea, I do dislike the look of the stock breaks. I haven't really tested the breaking power yet, but I do think the breaks should have been more appealing--larger (painted) calipers, discs. Ohh, and the auto A/C...i really dislike this feature! Besides that, looking through the rearview mirror isn't much fun either. But i guess these are all minor annoyances really..
Old 10-13-2005, 09:54 AM
  #29  
BOOFER7
Banned
 
BOOFER7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont like the drive by wire accelerator. The response is unpredictable. If it were a direct mechanical linkage, the respsonse would be instant and the shift points a little more predictable.

P.S. I have an AT wich might help understand the above statement.

I also have the same complaint with my 05 Xterra.
Old 10-13-2005, 10:03 AM
  #30  
Tattude
Registered User
 
Tattude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Titusville/Orlando
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tranny is fine (only have 4400 miles though)
Tires (OK) had worse...

It is weight all the way for worse aspect of a sports car.
Old 10-13-2005, 10:10 AM
  #31  
ActionJackson
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
ActionJackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: California
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Connecting rods of the VQ make it not 100% low-boost safe...
Old 10-13-2005, 10:11 AM
  #32  
superblackZ720
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
superblackZ720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: milford, ct
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Weight but to be honest when driving you could never tell its 3200 lbs
Old 10-13-2005, 10:41 AM
  #33  
naptime
Registered User
 
naptime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: california
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would have to go with weight as well
Old 10-13-2005, 10:46 AM
  #34  
AZZGUY
Registered User
 
AZZGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default weak spot

Oh for another cup holder! Perhaps nearer the driver?? When I get a cup in one hand and a cell phone in the other I drive in fear! ( oh yes, have to shift with that cup in hand too!)
Old 10-13-2005, 10:48 AM
  #35  
mavtais
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
mavtais's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CentralCal - Fresno
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread should be turned into a poll. Weight or Tires? What's the weakest link?
I'd say oem tires. Pretty darty car (tracked it once for 7 hours open track time) for 3200 lbs.
Old 10-13-2005, 10:50 AM
  #36  
southern_info
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
southern_info's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJackson
Connecting rods of the VQ make it not 100% low-boost safe...

+1 I totally agree with you on that 1!
Old 10-13-2005, 11:06 AM
  #37  
AZZGUY
Registered User
 
AZZGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BOOFER7
I dont like the drive by wire accelerator. The response is unpredictable. If it were a direct mechanical linkage, the respsonse would be instant and the shift points a little more predictable.

P.S. I have an AT wich might help understand the above statement.

I also have the same complaint with my 05 Xterra.
Hey, I have noticeably different response times - but never thought about it seriously until this post. Is this something that can be fine tuned at the dealorship?? Perhaps I should ask the dealor? LOL
Old 10-13-2005, 11:08 AM
  #38  
Tattude
Registered User
 
Tattude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Titusville/Orlando
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AZZGUY
Hey, I have noticeably different response times - but never thought about it seriously until this post. Is this something that can be fine tuned at the dealorship?? Perhaps I should ask the dealor? LOL
You have a MT...don't worry about it. It's all good.
Old 10-13-2005, 11:38 AM
  #39  
snommisbor
Registered User
 
snommisbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: austin
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tropicalypso
The performance of the d@mn door on the center console compartment in the dash. (I don't have a navigation system).

No matter how I push the button, it takes me several tries to open it.
me too
Old 10-13-2005, 11:41 AM
  #40  
350ZLO
Registered User
 
350ZLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

weight, crappy tires, non brembo brakes (if your spending upwards of $25k for a car u should be gettin brembo's no matter what model, i mean damn the EVO RS gets brembo's and they used to not even have power windows)


Quick Reply: What's weakest performance thing about 350Z?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.