Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

2006 Z Vs. 2006 Bmw Z4 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #1  
JoeyFyed's Avatar
JoeyFyed
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, California
Default 2006 Z Vs. 2006 Bmw Z4 3.0

So, just wondering what car would be faster.

http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/bmw_z4.asp

Z or Z4.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
ayman350z's Avatar
ayman350z
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: Miami, FL
Default

i have beaten a Z4 before...its was tough but i got him
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
JoeyFyed's Avatar
JoeyFyed
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, California
Default

That was prolly the 2005 Z4 which had less HP, i believe it was around 225. They uped the 2006 to 265 HP.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
skip2daZ's Avatar
skip2daZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach
Default

whats up with all these bmw's vs 350z's threads lately?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
superblackZ720's Avatar
superblackZ720
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: milford, ct
Default

gearing
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
edhchoe's Avatar
edhchoe
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: vancouver
Default

350Z weighs 3225 lb w/ 287 HP = 11.24 lb/HP.
Z4 weights 3053 lb w/ 265 HP = 11.52 lb/HP.

350Z has advantage in torque as well at 274 vs. 232 ft-lb.

But 0-60 mph times are ....
350Z = 5.93 sec
Z4 = 5.7 sec (0-62 mph).

Must be the gearing. But 350Z is more than $10K less than Z4. If I buy a track car it will be a 350Z track and not Z4 coupe.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
Fletch69z's Avatar
Fletch69z
Registered User
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by edhchoe
350Z weighs 3225 lb w/ 287 HP = 11.24 lb/HP.
Z4 weights 3053 lb w/ 265 HP = 11.52 lb/HP.

350Z has advantage in torque as well at 274 vs. 232 ft-lb.

But 0-60 mph times are ....
350Z = 5.93 sec
Z4 = 5.7 sec (0-62 mph).

Must be the gearing. But 350Z is more than $10K less than Z4. If I buy a track car it will be a 350Z track and not Z4 coupe.
+1-good points.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
spacemn_spiff's Avatar
spacemn_spiff
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Default

Originally Posted by edhchoe
But 0-60 mph times are ....
350Z = 5.93 sec
Z4 = 5.7 sec (0-62 mph).
0-60 for a Z = 5.3sec and not 5.93sec, was that a typo?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #9  
edhchoe's Avatar
edhchoe
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by spcemn_spiff
0-60 for a Z = 5.3sec and not 5.93sec, was that a typo?
It was not a typo. I copied the data from Edmunds.com for 2005 Track model.
0.63 second difference is alot in 0-60 times. 5.3 sec is probably the fastest time Nissan got and 5.93 sec is probably the average time Edmunds.com got.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #10  
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I'm staring at 2 issues of C&D on my desk. One is the Aug. 02 issue of the first C&D 350Z road test. The Z is pictured on the cover and it reads:

"First Test! Nissan 350Z Zero to 60 in 5.4 for less than $27,000!"

The other is C&D's Jan 03 road test of the BMW Z4 pictured on the cover. It reads,

"BMW Z4 From retro to techno 5.4 to 60!"

So, according to C&D anyway, they had identical 0-60 times back in 03.

The blurb in Nov 05 R&T (which I have in front of me also) says the Z4 will now have a 255 hp straight six. That's a 30 hp rise from the 225hp 3.0. Of course the Z now puts down 300hp, but I read slightly slower times. Then add the usual considerations of torque, weight, driver, yada yada and who knows. What is even more exciting is the news of the BMW Z4M @ 360horses! Can't say I like how it looks yet (in hardtop). I talked to my wife about possibly trading up, but she is not intersted in more hp, she's more than satisfied with her 2.5 Z4.

Oops, the site does say 265 hp. Guess R&T has it wrong. Wow, that is a 40hp increase. Wonder how they got a slower 0-60 with that type of increase?

Last edited by andrew; Oct 28, 2005 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
jtang03's Avatar
jtang03
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

who cares about how fast it is. all that matters is that it looks better than the z4!
hehhee.
j.p.
well to me it does.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #12  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Birthday:
August 19, 1987 Z/G Owner:
No Location:
Pasadena, California

BTW which do you drive a 350Z or BMW?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2005 | 10:04 PM
  #13  
andrew's Avatar
andrew
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by jtang03
who cares about how fast it is. all that matters is that it looks better than the z4!
hehhee.
j.p.
well to me it does.
Funny. We keep both cars garaged side by side. Up close, I love the low slung, long hood, short rear deck, curves and creases of the Z4. Sculptured and well detailed IMO. Makes the shape of the 350 look tall and dull in comparison. HOWEVER, step farther back or see them on the road and its a different story. To me, the lines of the Z4 become busy whereas the Z looks sexy yet muscular.

It's all subjective.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #14  
JoeyFyed's Avatar
JoeyFyed
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, California
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
Birthday:
August 19, 1987 Z/G Owner:
No Location:
Pasadena, California

BTW which do you drive a 350Z or BMW?

Dont have one yet, my choice will be between the 2. Thats why im asking =]
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #15  
Art Vandaleigh's Avatar
Art Vandaleigh
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Default

Those stats for Z4 are wrong, from bmw's webpage the car is 225hp/214tq. Its a decently quick car, but the Z has it by a good amount. The Z4 has very good handling though.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #16  
.Sin.'s Avatar
.Sin.
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Just get what u like...
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #17  
JoeyFyed's Avatar
JoeyFyed
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, California
Default

Originally Posted by Art Vandaleigh
Those stats for Z4 are wrong, from bmw's webpage the car is 225hp/214tq. Its a decently quick car, but the Z has it by a good amount. The Z4 has very good handling though.

your right, but thats the 2005 Z5. They upped the 06' to 265. =]
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #18  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Z hands down.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #19  
NeoRacer_106's Avatar
NeoRacer_106
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

anyone noticed when in traffic, BMW's NEVER will merge behind you? Like today it was empty behind me for like half a mile, infront a bit over a cars length of space...the BMW
meanders past me and proceeds to enter right infront of me...wtf..always..I did'nt settle for that so I pulled out and cut back in 10 cars ahead..F'ing snobs...
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #20  
Eiso's Avatar
Eiso
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by NeoRacer_106
anyone noticed when in traffic, BMW's NEVER will merge behind you? Like today it was empty behind me for like half a mile, infront a bit over a cars length of space...the BMW
meanders past me and proceeds to enter right infront of me...wtf..always..I did'nt settle for that so I pulled out and cut back in 10 cars ahead..F'ing snobs...
not always, dont be biased towards to bmw, some are some not
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM.