Who else hates the Badgering??
Originally Posted by Racer Z
I think the bottom line is that some people were never taught HOW to drive a stick (and may not want to take the time to master it)....or maybe they use the Z as a daily driver on heavily congested highways.
Although I'm in the "camp" that prefers stick vs auto, IMHO..I think it's ridiculous to say "This guy is a girly man cuz he bought an auto Z".
How about we RESPECT each other's choices and leave it at that!
Besides...you can be a "girly man" and drive a stick....Just ask old Red Ascot wearin', high pitched voice havin', "I like Trixie, but have never banged her" Speed Racer..LOL
Although I'm in the "camp" that prefers stick vs auto, IMHO..I think it's ridiculous to say "This guy is a girly man cuz he bought an auto Z".
How about we RESPECT each other's choices and leave it at that!
Besides...you can be a "girly man" and drive a stick....Just ask old Red Ascot wearin', high pitched voice havin', "I like Trixie, but have never banged her" Speed Racer..LOL
EdgeOfSanity I respect your opinion.
Agreed. We should all respect each others opinion and choices. So there is no
misunderstanding I am not bashing MT. For the record I love MT and AT.
And yes, I would take a well done 6spd over an AT anyday. Just trying to say
that we should respect the choices of one another and also realize that there
are better technologies out there than an MT. IMO the only stupid choice is a
choice made based on assumption.
Both AT and MT are legit choices in sports cars. Many here in the forum agree
and auto manufacturers also agree. I consider Porsche, Ferrari, Lotus and etc.
as purists. And the purists support AT or some derivative or hybrid of it...be it
SMG, Tiptronic, Steptronic or whatever.
It just seems like the bashing is endless both ways. MT owners argue MT>AT.
AT owners argue AT>MT. Then others (me
) argue SMG > MT & AT.
At what point do we all concede there are strengths and weaknesses in each
and no specific one is the better performer in every category?
Agreed. We should all respect each others opinion and choices. So there is no
misunderstanding I am not bashing MT. For the record I love MT and AT.
And yes, I would take a well done 6spd over an AT anyday. Just trying to say
that we should respect the choices of one another and also realize that there
are better technologies out there than an MT. IMO the only stupid choice is a
choice made based on assumption.
Both AT and MT are legit choices in sports cars. Many here in the forum agree
and auto manufacturers also agree. I consider Porsche, Ferrari, Lotus and etc.
as purists. And the purists support AT or some derivative or hybrid of it...be it
SMG, Tiptronic, Steptronic or whatever.
It just seems like the bashing is endless both ways. MT owners argue MT>AT.
AT owners argue AT>MT. Then others (me
) argue SMG > MT & AT. At what point do we all concede there are strengths and weaknesses in each
and no specific one is the better performer in every category?
Heh, no skill huh? Sorry, but i only use the tip shift on my auto. And it requires shifting at the right moment or you hit the rev limiter. Underpowered? Heh, i have very few mods and have run 13.39. What advantage exactly does a MT have over an AT? The advantage of having more moving parts? The advantage of having to add another step in shifting? The advantage of sitting in rush hour traffic and having to work the clutch every 3 sec? The advantage of missing a shift at a criticle moment? It's less money for a MT, so, i guess that's a good advantage. The advantage of comming to rest at a red light on one of these AL hills and having the Ahole behind you pull up 6" from your bumper?
I'm not against a MT, if you like it, that's great, drive it. But, saying that an AT is inferior to a MT is wrong.
I would say "see ya on the street" but, i don't look in the rear view mirror too often.
I'm not against a MT, if you like it, that's great, drive it. But, saying that an AT is inferior to a MT is wrong.
I would say "see ya on the street" but, i don't look in the rear view mirror too often.
DayBlueZ you are right. It does take skill to drive AT and MT. Basic driving
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
Originally Posted by ROGUELITE
DayBlueZ you are right. It does take skill to drive AT and MT. Basic driving
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
Originally Posted by ROGUELITE
DayBlueZ you are right. It does take skill to drive AT and MT. Basic driving
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
concepts such as throttle steer, etc. cover AT and MT. Saying there is no
skill required to drive an AT is simply not true.
Maybe no skill required to use a clutch, but then there isn't one on AT.
so many vette owners drive autos because they are not performance enthusiasts. Most of them are older guys who probably wanted a vette when they were young but couldnt afford it. 2nd reason alot of them are autos is autos are almost always superior at the dragstrip. The people who buy the manuals understand the essence of a sports car. There is nothing more satisfying than running through the gears in a manual.
I agree with you 100% on this. My old Celica GT was a 5spd. and I loved running through the gears. However the auto Z does come with a tq. converter which multiplies torque throughout the rev range. Thats why the performance difference of both cars are identical. Also the SMG2 on the M3 is not a traditional automatic. Its an automated manual. Same thing with ferrari's F1 shifter which shifts in only 25milliseconds between gears
the sooner that you learn in life that people will always be trying to knock you down a peg... the sooner you won't let that stuff get to you.
If it wasn't the automatic transmission it would be something else... i.e.
if the haters arn't saying
"I would never have gotten the auto"
they will be saying
"why would you buy the Z if the G is so much nicer"
and if you had a 6mt G it would just be something else.
If it wasn't the automatic transmission it would be something else... i.e.
if the haters arn't saying
"I would never have gotten the auto"
they will be saying
"why would you buy the Z if the G is so much nicer"
and if you had a 6mt G it would just be something else.
Originally Posted by DomZ
So EdgeofSanity, you can talk all kinds of ****, but you can't back it up? You don't deserve to own a Z d-bag. 

Originally Posted by ROGUELITE
EdgeOfSanity I respect your opinion.
Agreed. We should all respect each others opinion and choices. So there is no
misunderstanding I am not bashing MT. For the record I love MT and AT.
And yes, I would take a well done 6spd over an AT anyday. Just trying to say
that we should respect the choices of one another and also realize that there
are better technologies out there than an MT. IMO the only stupid choice is a
choice made based on assumption.
Both AT and MT are legit choices in sports cars. Many here in the forum agree
and auto manufacturers also agree. I consider Porsche, Ferrari, Lotus and etc.
as purists. And the purists support AT or some derivative or hybrid of it...be it
SMG, Tiptronic, Steptronic or whatever.
It just seems like the bashing is endless both ways. MT owners argue MT>AT.
AT owners argue AT>MT. Then others (me
) argue SMG > MT & AT.
At what point do we all concede there are strengths and weaknesses in each
and no specific one is the better performer in every category?
Agreed. We should all respect each others opinion and choices. So there is no
misunderstanding I am not bashing MT. For the record I love MT and AT.
And yes, I would take a well done 6spd over an AT anyday. Just trying to say
that we should respect the choices of one another and also realize that there
are better technologies out there than an MT. IMO the only stupid choice is a
choice made based on assumption.
Both AT and MT are legit choices in sports cars. Many here in the forum agree
and auto manufacturers also agree. I consider Porsche, Ferrari, Lotus and etc.
as purists. And the purists support AT or some derivative or hybrid of it...be it
SMG, Tiptronic, Steptronic or whatever.
It just seems like the bashing is endless both ways. MT owners argue MT>AT.
AT owners argue AT>MT. Then others (me
) argue SMG > MT & AT. At what point do we all concede there are strengths and weaknesses in each
and no specific one is the better performer in every category?
im sorry but i cant respect the choice someone makes of buying an auto in a sports car. It just doesnt make sense to me. Smg is not a derivative of an automatic, its a manual gearbox with a clutch controlled by a computer.
Originally Posted by DayBlueZ
Heh, no skill huh? Sorry, but i only use the tip shift on my auto. And it requires shifting at the right moment or you hit the rev limiter.

Underpowered? Heh, i have very few mods and have run 13.39. What advantage exactly does a MT have over an AT? The advantage of having more moving parts? The advantage of having to add another step in shifting?
The advantage of sitting in rush hour traffic and having to work the clutch every 3 sec?
The advantage of missing a shift at a criticle moment? It's less money for a MT, so, i guess that's a good advantage. The advantage of comming to rest at a red light on one of these AL hills and having the Ahole behind you pull up 6" from your bumper?
I'm not against a MT, if you like it, that's great, drive it. But, saying that an AT is inferior to a MT is wrong.
I would say "see ya on the street" but, i don't look in the rear view mirror too often.
Not sure who is more insecure here... the MT owners who feel like they need to bash the AT owners or the AT owners that are letting it get them down.
If you own a MT and you're proud of it; good for you. It’s much better to be modest than to brag about your achievements.
If you own the AT and are letting the MT owners push you into a flame war, don’t take it so seriously.
I like fast cars but I don’t like driving a stick, if some people think I am ghey or a puzzy b/c of that, well that’s their problem not mine. I know I will never get ‘respect’ from people like that so why should I even care? I would rather the MT owners think I was a little b!tch, poser car enthusiast, ect than buy a car with a standard that I didn’t want just to impress people I don’t care about.
-hypeiv (poser car enthusiast, ghey, puzzy, b!tch)
If you own a MT and you're proud of it; good for you. It’s much better to be modest than to brag about your achievements.
If you own the AT and are letting the MT owners push you into a flame war, don’t take it so seriously.
I like fast cars but I don’t like driving a stick, if some people think I am ghey or a puzzy b/c of that, well that’s their problem not mine. I know I will never get ‘respect’ from people like that so why should I even care? I would rather the MT owners think I was a little b!tch, poser car enthusiast, ect than buy a car with a standard that I didn’t want just to impress people I don’t care about.
-hypeiv (poser car enthusiast, ghey, puzzy, b!tch)
Originally Posted by hypeiv
Not sure who is more insecure here... the MT owners who feel like they need to bash the AT owners or the AT owners that are letting it get them down.
If you own a MT and you're proud of it; good for you. It’s much better to be modest than to brag about your achievements.
If you own the AT and are letting the MT owners push you into a flame war, don’t take it so seriously.
I like fast cars but I don’t like driving a stick, if some people think I am ghey or a puzzy b/c of that, well that’s their problem not mine. I know I will never get ‘respect’ from people like that so why should I even care? I would rather the MT owners think I was a little b!tch, poser car enthusiast, ect than buy a car with a standard that I didn’t want just to impress people I don’t care about.
-hypeiv (poser car enthusiast, ghey, puzzy, b!tch)

If you own a MT and you're proud of it; good for you. It’s much better to be modest than to brag about your achievements.
If you own the AT and are letting the MT owners push you into a flame war, don’t take it so seriously.
I like fast cars but I don’t like driving a stick, if some people think I am ghey or a puzzy b/c of that, well that’s their problem not mine. I know I will never get ‘respect’ from people like that so why should I even care? I would rather the MT owners think I was a little b!tch, poser car enthusiast, ect than buy a car with a standard that I didn’t want just to impress people I don’t care about.
-hypeiv (poser car enthusiast, ghey, puzzy, b!tch)

Well said!!!
I always had this one question:
if Ferrari sequential gearbox, M3's SMGII, or even M5's SMGIII shift in couple milliseconds, how do they operate the clutch? Does the computer just pop out the clutch and let the car jerk while accelerating?
I mean I know there are settings from mild to extreme for those SMGs, for extreme setting, does the computer do that?
if Ferrari sequential gearbox, M3's SMGII, or even M5's SMGIII shift in couple milliseconds, how do they operate the clutch? Does the computer just pop out the clutch and let the car jerk while accelerating?
I mean I know there are settings from mild to extreme for those SMGs, for extreme setting, does the computer do that?


