Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

2005 Vs 2006

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2005, 12:22 PM
  #21  
Si_2_350Z
Registered User
 
Si_2_350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BayArea
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice, i got 06
Old 11-28-2005, 12:28 PM
  #22  
Mr Z
Registered User
 
Mr Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^I'm of the opinion that the real world results outweight any humming and hawing over theoretical stuff. The real world track results will show you if the 300hp can overcome the extra weight, etc. I think it did. But, yeah, on the street its probably not noticeable as they say.

I don't think Best Motoring would be biased from one Z to another Z!


Originally Posted by VeeTec
Best Motoring is not a reliable source, especially given a heavier car with the same power?! Honestly, you would think a car that hit full power quicker would have the advantage, since they supposedly made the same 280 hp. They tend to do biased reports.

The drag strip is a better place to see which car is quicker, by doing a heads up run.

200+ lbs is a lot for a 13 hp increase to overcome, not to mention the torque loss.

On a road course, the extra weight will hurt, as will the loss of torque coming out of the corners.

If it didn't weigh so much more, the slight power gain would help the top end on the longer straights.

IMO, the 300hp Z is no quicker than the Z with 287hp, but time will tell.
Old 11-28-2005, 12:32 PM
  #23  
HighwaySpeed
Registered User
 
HighwaySpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 14,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skeleton jack
Who would win. Superman or God?












I Would.
Old 11-28-2005, 12:41 PM
  #24  
VeeTec
Registered User
 
VeeTec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jackson County, GA
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe I should just go drive one and compare. Oh wait, mine isn't stock.
Old 11-28-2005, 01:36 PM
  #25  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Please go to the dragstrip several times and race. Not test-and-tune but competition racing. You'll learn about your car and your skills. You’ll also learn the answer to your question.
Old 11-28-2005, 01:39 PM
  #26  
Rasengan
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Rasengan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VeeTec
Best Motoring is not a reliable source, especially given a heavier car with the same power?! Honestly, you would think a car that hit full power quicker would have the advantage, since they supposedly made the same 280 hp. They tend to do biased reports.

The drag strip is a better place to see which car is quicker, by doing a heads up run.

200+ lbs is a lot for a 13 hp increase to overcome, not to mention the torque loss.

On a road course, the extra weight will hurt, as will the loss of torque coming out of the corners.

If it didn't weigh so much more, the slight power gain would help the top end on the longer straights.

IMO, the 300hp Z is no quicker than the Z with 287hp, but time will tell.
Best Motoring is the most reliable source any of us have at the moment...those guys are pro drivers, neither you nor i can say the same and this is what they do (i'd much rather trust them then anyone else that takes their car to the drag as BMI goes as far as measures weather conditions and humidity)...to say they aren't reliable especially when they're comparing 2 of the exact same vehicle is an opinion

also, the drag strip is a good place to see what can go faster in a straight line but track is to see which can go faster overall in all aspects of the car, ie. braking, handling, corner speed...and like i said, the 35th Anniversary took the 287hp version from the line as well and by the end of the race, the 35th was a decent 4-5 car lengths ahead...in fact, every single lap the 35th was a good .4 to a full second faster in times...
Attached Thumbnails 2005 Vs 2006-pickup.jpg   2005 Vs 2006-rev.jpg   2005 Vs 2006-rims.jpg   2005 Vs 2006-lead.jpg   2005 Vs 2006-times.jpg  


Last edited by Rasengan; 11-28-2005 at 01:42 PM.
Old 11-28-2005, 01:46 PM
  #27  
Fletch69z
Registered User
iTrader: (50)
 
Fletch69z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davidv

I've seen the specs on Barney and I'm not impressed. If you guys want to feed your childish fantasies and go with Barney, good for you. But until I see some time slips, I say bologna.
Hahahahah, wtf, .
Old 11-28-2005, 09:35 PM
  #28  
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 13,654
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tenac1ousZ
not to metion the 600-lbs of fat a$$ barney
d00d, barney recently went on a diet, plus he isnt really fat, just big boneded
Old 11-28-2005, 09:44 PM
  #29  
JunJTan
Registered User
 
JunJTan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: OR
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your are not the first one asked this question. it depends on drivers.
Old 11-29-2005, 07:29 AM
  #30  
VeeTec
Registered User
 
VeeTec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jackson County, GA
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having a LOT of track time myself, I will withhold judgement, until I can drive one.

I don't care who you are, 200 lbs is a good deal of weight to overcome with just 13 hp, especially when the car makes less torque. When you road race, the torque is a very important factor coming out of the turns.

It's possible you are right, I just find it difficult to believe, until I see for myself.
Old 11-29-2005, 07:40 AM
  #31  
shifty711
Registered User
 
shifty711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Detroit area Michigan
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO who gives a ****. The people with 05s are pissed because the 06 has more power. The people with 06 are pissed because they have less torque than an 05. Everyone get over the stupid little difference. I have an 05 with the 300 hp engine. I have driven both. My only complaint is the lower redline of the 287 hp engine. It felt wierd because i was used to my car. And my car felt slightly faster but it has slight mods.

Honestly. Who cares? no one keeps their Z stock nowadays anyway. So it really doesnt matter.
Old 11-29-2005, 07:41 AM
  #32  
Rasengan
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Rasengan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VeeTec
Having a LOT of track time myself, I will withhold judgement, until I can drive one.

I don't care who you are, 200 lbs is a good deal of weight to overcome with just 13 hp, especially when the car makes less torque. When you road race, the torque is a very important factor coming out of the turns.

It's possible you are right, I just find it difficult to believe, until I see for myself.
i'm not arguing with you, 200lbs. is a lot for just 13hp to negate...especially when you take into account that both cars were at 280hp and NOT 287hp vs. 300hp...so what gives? if you watch the video, you can clearly see one beating the other consistently...it wasn't even as if the non-Revup was keeping up with the Revup but the Revup just kept steadily gaining more and more distance

even at the beginning of the race, both drivers said there should be no noticeable difference...in fact they said the Revup's wider rims should give it more oversteer but instead it balanced out the car

i don't know...perhaps those few minor adjustments Nissan made really did make a difference? i can't say, i've never driven an '05 or a 35th Anniversary...my '06 still only has 300 miles on it and i haven't floored or gone over 4k rpms yet so i can't make any kind of judgments whatsoever...i'm only reporting what was on that video

but again, in the end, BOTH drivers agreed that NONE of that would be notieceable on the street...the difference is too unsubstantial
Old 11-29-2005, 08:25 AM
  #33  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The Z has gone though 2,400 cc 2,600 cc, 2,800 cc 3,000 cc and now 3,500 cc (two types so far). One day we will see a 370 or 380Z. Progress is inevitable. So relax and enjoy your ride.
Old 11-29-2005, 09:00 AM
  #34  
VeeTec
Registered User
 
VeeTec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jackson County, GA
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am pretty sure the JDM version makes the same 300hp power that USDM version makes, but they rate it at 280hp to get by the Japanese power requirements.

This has been proven with cars like the GT-R.

David, we are only discussing the difference and most of us are relaxed. I hope it does perform better, as we should be making progress.
Old 11-29-2005, 10:41 AM
  #35  
Chad68
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Chad68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manjot
I was going to ask this question but i figured that I would get flamed, so I was like f it

You would have been flamed, we just like Halo better
Old 11-29-2005, 05:17 PM
  #36  
LBCz33
Registered User
 
LBCz33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I understand the performance difference is pretty small...and some of you are right it probably doesn't make a difference...

One of the mags ran a test on this topic (need remember which one) but I remember it stated that the 05 (35th and Track) with 300hp had a slightly faster 0-60 time (I think only .1 - .2 second difference) and a very slight advantage in the 1/4.

They didn't test the 06, but I'm not sure how much the 130-150lbs difference would make in those numbers... My guess is that it would bring it in line with the 287hp numbers. Also with the larger wheels, especially on the Track and GT, the larger contact patch will help launching the vehicle and maintaining traction through the first part of the run....
Old 11-30-2005, 05:19 AM
  #37  
Speedracer
Registered User
 
Speedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Halo
I keep hearing diffrent stories about which would win in a race.

a 2005 stick with 287 hp with 274 TQ or the 2006 with 300 hp and 260 tq.

I keep hearing the 2005 would win?
Has been tested. No performance difference whatsoever. 300hp motor has a more "free revving" feel, is smoother, and Nissan can now market the car as having "300hp".
Old 11-30-2005, 10:10 AM
  #38  
03lemans
Registered User
 
03lemans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by shifty711
IMO who gives a ****. The people with 05s are pissed because the 06 has more power. The people with 06 are pissed because they have less torque than an 05. Everyone get over the stupid little difference. I have an 05 with the 300 hp engine. I have driven both. My only complaint is the lower redline of the 287 hp engine. It felt wierd because i was used to my car. And my car felt slightly faster but it has slight mods.

Honestly. Who cares? no one keeps their Z stock nowadays anyway. So it really doesnt matter.
^ THANK YOU!!!
Old 11-30-2005, 01:49 PM
  #39  
Nismo 350z
New Member
 
Nismo 350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So.Cali 626-951
Posts: 2,239
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Speedracer
Has been tested. No performance difference whatsoever. 300hp motor has a more "free revving" feel, is smoother, and Nissan can now market the car as having "300hp".
+1
Old 11-30-2005, 09:08 PM
  #40  
King56
Registered User
 
King56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Redmond, Wa
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are no more power restrictions in japan btw.. and so there is no confusion, this was a pact made up by the auto companies, toyota,nissan,honda and such. So they would not get into HP wars with cars when they should be going for gas mileage.

Been out since the end of last year or so.

That is why all the newer japanese cars are over 300 and such this last year, and upcoming models are all over 300 for the sportty cars and such.


Quick Reply: 2005 Vs 2006



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 AM.