When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If they would have took it to pavement instead of sand and mood , there would be no comparison. THE Z WAS FASTER, LOOKED BETTER, AND HANDLE BETTER THAN ALL CARS EXCEPT FOR THE AUDI ON THE BEACH.
A beach race and a rally race? C'mon. How many owners of those cars are going to drive them in shyt like that? The TT is cute, the Chrysler sucks and the Z is just badass.
Why would they use any of these cars for a rally race? A TT Quattro I could understand, but in a rally race, i'm going to choose an STi or an Evo. You know, cars that are actually modeled for rally racing.
Hah clarkson said the chrysler was good looking. Pretty dumb comparison, not very real world. I wish they told you what happened to the audi too. It broke down in the middle of the test and then its working again.
Not a Crossfire...I'm a tech for a Chrysler/Jeep dealership and those things are complete trash to drive and to work on. Never get one. Ever.
hahaha. I figured as much. Despite the obvious biased opinions I think Top Gear is one of the most entertaining car shows I have ever seen. I mean who else goes to Iceland just to race convertables in the mud?
Last edited by MovingViolation; Dec 10, 2005 at 08:58 AM.
I don't know why Clarkson doesnt like the Z so much....the sound? In his first test he complained of the noise, in this test he did again, and his little biotch said the same. What sound?
what a bloody hell. mate? Z rule.... like someone here said.... TT is cute. crossfire suck aZZ ( just look at the d@mn thing) Ugly as hell..... Z rule again IMO...