Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Anyone had rock chips repaired by Nissan?

Old Aug 26, 2006 | 07:54 AM
  #21  
Swiffer's Avatar
Swiffer
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: Kitchen Floor
Default

Originally Posted by jadaniya
well, 2,000 miles isn't ****
Ok.

**UPDATE**
5500 miles and still 0 chips.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 08:19 AM
  #22  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by abyss
its common on every new car, they don't use high quality paint anymore, nothing you can do about it except deal with it and/or repaint and clear bra it.
I kinda agree and disagree. It is definitely common -- my last car (S2000) was awful in this dept. Chips all over the place. Then I rear-ended this guy when we were both turning right (he went halfway into the road and then stopped. Me, thinking he had gone, checked to see if it was clear for me, and it was, so I went. SMACK! Now, if it was clear for me to go, then what the hell was he doing still there. Ah, but that's another discussion!). Anyway, seeing how I had to have my front end re-painted anyway, I saw this as a the silver lining in a dark cloud. The body shop guy explained to me that all new cars now come with flex-additive in the paint they use for the bumpers. The theory is that if you do a minor bump into something, the paint won't crack -- it'll just flex and the damage will be minimized to a little scuff at most. But the problem is that flex-additive makes the paint soft, so it's more prone to chipping. So it's not really a matter cheap paint -- it's more like another example of where someone thinks they have a bright idea to make things better, and end up making things worse for everybody!

Btw, I'm getting my clear bra put on on Monday. My Z is still pristine (only 700 miles), and with all the stuff I've read on this forum about this problem, I'm taking pre-emptive measures!
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #23  
Built2shredZ's Avatar
Built2shredZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,235
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
Default

You really can't compare SUV's or Trucks to a 350z, the Z sits a lot lower to the ground and its going to get hammered a lot harder then a SUV or Truck that sits much higher... Even a std. Sedan sits quite a bit higher especially if are Z's are lowered..

I would probably complain to Insurance companies as it was probably there idea to put the flex additive in paint that makes it so easy to chip ..
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #24  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Built2shredZ
I would probably complain to Insurance companies as it was probably there idea to put the flex additive in paint that makes it so easy to chip ..
Which leads me to wonder -- if you lease a 350Z, do they try to add insult to injury by dinging you for excessive wear/damage on the rock chips when you return the car? That'd p1ss me off so bad!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #25  
350zlove's Avatar
350zlove
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 1
From: West Allis Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by semtex
Which leads me to wonder -- if you lease a 350Z, do they try to add insult to injury by dinging you for excessive wear/damage on the rock chips when you return the car? That'd p1ss me off so bad!
Good point!!! That will be interesting.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 10:36 PM
  #26  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Braveheart
I understand all that but given that the Z suffers so horribly from this, Nissan has to admit this is a problem.
Are you aware of any other cars that experiences this problem so badly - I'm not.
Why should I adjust my driving style and/or incur the extra cost of extra protection because Nissan can't paint the Z properly?
If'd known it was going to be this bad, I would have (reluctantly) invested in a clear bra in the first place. Now I'm facing a repaint cost AND a clear bra to maintain that investment.
Sorry if it sounds my venting is targeted to your reply but I find it difficult to accept that this is "normal" or "to be expected" when other cheaper cars can survive better.

think again. i have an 04.5 with 15k miles. zero rock chips. why? cause i changed my driving habits when i bought this car. i follow a 3 second rule on the freeway. first of all its safer, second of all, less likely hood of getting chips. i owned a 98 SS camaro before my Z. it had rock chips galore. why? cause i didnt follow the 3 second rule.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #27  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
i have an 04.5 with 15k miles. zero rock chips. why? cause i changed my driving habits when i bought this car. i follow a 3 second rule on the freeway. first of all its safer, second of all, less likely hood of getting chips.
Ditto the 3 second rule. I too make a point of keeping my distance, not just to avoid rock chips, but to avoid any sort of debris. I learned this lesson the hard way when I was following a pickup truck on the Interstate one day. Some a$$ dropped a ladder in the lane. The truck cleared it fine, but I didn't have enough time to react and went right over it, bursting both left tires and bending BOTH left rims! It was a mess. I'm just glad the cars behind me didn't smack into me. Anyway, I try to leave more space now. Although I will say that I still get smacked by stones going sideways every now and then, which results in chips on the side of the car. And don't get me started on vehicles that drive around spraying motor oil! It's happened to me about 4 times already. Hey..is it raining? Hmm..when I turn on the wipers, those droplets just spread into a weird coating all over the place, blinding me. Ugh!!!
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #28  
highside107's Avatar
highside107
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY
Default

Originally Posted by semtex
Ditto the 3 second rule. I too make a point of keeping my distance, not just to avoid rock chips, but to avoid any sort of debris. I learned this lesson the hard way when I was following a pickup truck on the Interstate one day. Some a$$ dropped a ladder in the lane. The truck cleared it fine, but I didn't have enough time to react and went right over it, bursting both left tires and bending BOTH left rims! It was a mess. I'm just glad the cars behind me didn't smack into me. Anyway, I try to leave more space now. Although I will say that I still get smacked by stones going sideways every now and then, which results in chips on the side of the car. And don't get me started on vehicles that drive around spraying motor oil! It's happened to me about 4 times already. Hey..is it raining? Hmm..when I turn on the wipers, those droplets just spread into a weird coating all over the place, blinding me. Ugh!!!
Ouch man, sounds painful. I know what you mean about the rock chips on the side. I get them too!
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #29  
Black_Sunshine's Avatar
Black_Sunshine
New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Mexifornia
Default

While maintaining a longer following distance can't hurt, my theory is that part of the problem is speed. Debris that is kicked up has very little velocity, but when you smack it at 80+ mph, it's going to leave a mark. The three second rule is great for driving safety, but you are covering ground so quickly that there is no way to avoid said debris.

The only solution I've come up with is to reduce my speed (~70) when there are other cars around, and keep a huge distance, 8-10 seconds. The rate at which I'm incurring chips since further modifying my driving habits has gone down. I still need to get my bumper repainted and some chips on the hood fixed.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #30  
semtex's Avatar
semtex
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by Black_Sunshine
The only solution I've come up with is to reduce my speed (~70) when there are other cars around, and keep a huge distance, 8-10 seconds.
I take my hat off to you. You're much more disciplined than I am with my lead foot!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rev_Night
Wheels & Tires
30
Nov 7, 2020 06:00 PM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 AM.