Used 350Z or new Tiburon???
06-15-2006, 09:55 PM
#83
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fletch69z
There really isn't any comparison. I've driven both and they don't even fall into the same class. Z.
Precisely..... Apples to Oranges.
06-27-2006, 07:33 AM
#84
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mobile, alabama
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i actually like the looks of the tib. it is pretty nice looking to me. i just went to the hyundai site and built a nice tib se model. But i think its all on what you want. You gotta be happy with your decision. Both cars have their pros and cons, as no car is perfect. The z is nice, i really like it and i really like the tib, but they are in different classes. i think the tib would be better against the new eclipse. Those two cars i would think are in direct competition with each other
06-27-2006, 08:20 AM
#85
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OREGON
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Prflyer
The Tiburon is a nice car dont get me wrong, but it really is no comparison... that is like deciding between a New Mazda or a used BMW... I recently bought the Z with 10,000 miles 2004, over a new Porsche Boxster 06, I have owned a Boxster 98' and can tell you I am very happy with the decision, if the car has some Warranty left on it, go for it, Nissans are very reliable..
Doesnt the Z have a engine from a Renault? Aleast thats what the guy from Top Gear (5th Gear) said, he hates the car for some reason.. Or was the engine designed by someone in Japan and Renault just manufactures it?
06-27-2006, 09:29 AM
#87
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado, Fort Collins
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hyundai = bleh. I drove one as my first car when I turned 16. Want to know why they have such a great warrenty? Because the car isn't reliable like a Nissan. The car had about 35k on it, but it went through 3 clutches in the time I owned it, synchro's got all fubar'd.
Doing work on it yourself isn't fun either. Korean design = lose imho.
Doing work on it yourself isn't fun either. Korean design = lose imho.
06-27-2006, 10:12 AM
#89
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by uncutZ00
the Tib handles better, weighs less, uses less gas, has better warranty, seats 4, has better value, higher resale value, more power to the front wheels (FWD Better to drive on freeways covered in oil) , and to top it all off, Nissan is being bought out by GM, so that means the interior will be plastic and the warranty will only cover the first 3 weeks of purchase.
Articles:
http://www.autointell.com/news-2000/...h-28-00-p2.htm
and
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...13/ai_63676089
But overall, I'd take the Z over the Tiburon. Not because its a performer, RWD, looks nicer, etc. Because the feeling you'd get from owning one of Nissan/Datsun's legendary cars. It all started in 1969 with the 240Z (also the limited run off of 240ZG's in 1971), then came the 260Z, 280Z, 300ZXs, then the 350Z. Its one of Nissan's most memorable cars to have. I don't believe the Tiburon has a history of cars like that. Nissan's cars are usually more on their amazing history that makes them so good.
(Note: the 240ZX, 260ZX, and 280ZX are the North American versions of the Z counterparts.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
