Turbonator Thumbs up or down?
08-23-2006, 11:26 AM
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
basically what everyone is trying to say without getting banned, is that the product you are asking about is a huge joke. Yea it might look good with the tests they show.. but in real life test by people on many fourms.. the product doesnt work..
08-23-2006, 11:33 AM
#7
Registered User
"These devices, which are usually installed on the upstream side of the mass airflow (MAF) sensor, use stationary vanes or, on some devices, spinning blades to make the inlet air between the air cleaner and intake manifold whirl around in a mini-tornado. This vortex supposedly mixes fuel more thoroughly with air, which means the fuel will, theoretically, burn more completely in the combustion chamber. Trouble is, there's a lot of intake tract downstream from these devices designed to maximize a smooth airflow. Turbulence, coupled with the restricted airflow caused by the device, can only reduce the amount of air sucked into the manifold. Less air means less power.
Again, we tested two devices. The TornadoFuelSaver is a nicely made stainless steel contraption, available in an assortment of sizes to fit most vehicles. We installed it on our truck's intake tract immediately upstream of the MAF sensor. We purchased the second device, the Intake Twister, on eBay. It was crudely handmade from sheet-aluminum flashing and pop rivets. It looked like something we could make in about 10 minutes from an old soda can. The staff at UTI was reluctant to install it: The bent sheetmetal vanes looked as if they might break off and be digested by the engine. The device is one-size-fits-all, and is simply bent into a curl to insert it into the intake duct.
THE DYNO SAYS: Both devices reduced peak horsepower by more than 10 percent. The Intake Twister increased fuel consumption by about 20 percent; the TornadoFuelSaver provided no significant change"
http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...tml?page=2&c=y
Again, we tested two devices. The TornadoFuelSaver is a nicely made stainless steel contraption, available in an assortment of sizes to fit most vehicles. We installed it on our truck's intake tract immediately upstream of the MAF sensor. We purchased the second device, the Intake Twister, on eBay. It was crudely handmade from sheet-aluminum flashing and pop rivets. It looked like something we could make in about 10 minutes from an old soda can. The staff at UTI was reluctant to install it: The bent sheetmetal vanes looked as if they might break off and be digested by the engine. The device is one-size-fits-all, and is simply bent into a curl to insert it into the intake duct.
THE DYNO SAYS: Both devices reduced peak horsepower by more than 10 percent. The Intake Twister increased fuel consumption by about 20 percent; the TornadoFuelSaver provided no significant change"
http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...tml?page=2&c=y
Trending Topics
08-23-2006, 12:11 PM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by alexfair
so basically i should get this product and buy one for each of my family memebers since it does such a good job!?! 
hehehe JK
08-23-2006, 01:51 PM
#17
I heard if you paint it black the air traveling through the intake duct will bounce off the stainless steel fins, creating a stronger vortex to generate explosive hp gains.
There have been reports of net 43whp+ from 4500 - 5000 rpm. The 3rd generation turbonator is lighter and built for race purposes ONLY.
There have been reports of net 43whp+ from 4500 - 5000 rpm. The 3rd generation turbonator is lighter and built for race purposes ONLY.
08-23-2006, 01:54 PM
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fontana, California
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i hear if you put a turbonator in your intake...and it falls apart...and it gets into your tb and then into the motor ....i hear you get totally F*ED
