Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

We Suck!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2006, 03:42 PM
  #1  
thrill350z
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
thrill350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: long island
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default We Suck!

in a very upsetting issue of motor trend they compared roadsters. 350z touring, z4 3.0si and the solstice gxp. we came in last in just about everything. we were the slowest to 60, in the quarter mile and braking prob. bc the 350z is 500lbs more then the others. Well the solstice gxp came in first and costs less then $30,000. the z4 came in second and is $50,000 and the 350z was last and was listed at $38,845 and said the 350z "lives and dies on its lizard like styling". Also in the issue they compare the bmw 330i sport to the g35s and the 330i came out on top. Not a very positive issue of motor trend for us nissan/infiniti guys.
Old 08-24-2006, 03:46 PM
  #2  
NewJerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
NewJerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MF Motor Trend...It's a second rate car mag anyway. Those ***holes probably take kickbacks from car companies to put their cars in the best possible light.
Old 08-24-2006, 03:51 PM
  #3  
maxpowers
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
maxpowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah we are not extreme in any category except price and that doesn't usually get reflected in the tests.

I was strongly leaning for the Z4 3.0 which is comparable or slightly better in performance but (i) I think the 350ZR looks better and (ii) I couldn't justify the price differential. Note the ZR never gets compared to the similar priced Z4 2.5.

I still love my Z though. The 330 will win because of its interior and fit and finish, but I certainly didn't go from my 3 series to a Z for interior comfort.

I still love my ZR.
Old 08-24-2006, 03:52 PM
  #4  
yukonlikmiballs
Registered User
 
yukonlikmiballs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: dallas
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 ^^^
Old 08-24-2006, 04:09 PM
  #6  
Suvlaki
Registered User
 
Suvlaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who cares if you're 0.10sec slower than the next guy? The solstice looks like a girls poo and the Z4 is way overpriced for what you get. I, personally, don't care that I don't have the fastest car for the buck. My car makes me happy... doesn't have to make the editers happy.
Old 08-24-2006, 04:20 PM
  #7  
chingwithbling
Registered User
 
chingwithbling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could've sworn a Z4 3.0 was a bit slower than a Z. How much slower was the ZR?
Old 08-24-2006, 04:25 PM
  #8  
aren21
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
aren21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So. cal.
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suvlaki
Who cares if you're 0.10sec slower than the next guy? The solstice looks like a girls poo and the Z4 is way overpriced for what you get. I, personally, don't care that I don't have the fastest car for the buck. My car makes me happy... doesn't have to make the editers happy.
+1, Z4 is overpriced (typical bimmer), and the pontiac.....is a pontiac. period.
Old 08-24-2006, 04:27 PM
  #9  
cj350
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
cj350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: My House ....
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow
Old 08-24-2006, 04:53 PM
  #10  
MI 35th
OGPremierMafia
iTrader: (16)
 
MI 35th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 5,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

P O N T I A C = BOOO

Z4 = too much Plastic

350Z is sexy but heavy!
Old 08-24-2006, 05:07 PM
  #11  
Casanova
Registered User
 
Casanova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6,225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man those Fkn alterator Fk HeadS!
Take no notice of anyone who puts down the Z - Some jealousy due to the fact that all Z drivers are good lookin
Old 08-24-2006, 05:12 PM
  #12  
bboypuertoroc
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,912
Received 2,448 Likes on 1,769 Posts
Default

Not all Z drivers look good (search for Shayan).
Old 08-24-2006, 05:17 PM
  #13  
Vick781
Registered User
 
Vick781's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
Not all Z drivers look good (search for Shayan).
OWNED!
Old 08-24-2006, 05:32 PM
  #14  
streetracer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
streetracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Juan
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NewJerZ
MF Motor Trend...It's a second rate car mag anyway. Those ***holes probably take kickbacks from car companies to put their cars in the best possible light.
Stopped reading the MT for the exact same reason. Flowers to the editors bought you a positive article. Switched to MPH and some other stuff.
Old 08-24-2006, 06:19 PM
  #15  
spf4000
New Member
 
spf4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SF, freezing my @ss off
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the article that biased? I mean, if the ZR weighs 500 lbs more than the other cars in the comparison, it'll really be hard to make up for the dificiency. It's not like the ZR has much fatter tires to have more grip, or has way more power to make up for the weight handicap. It kinda makes sense that it comes in last, especially when it perfroms the worst. Not sure why people automatically bash the editors in this case.
Old 08-24-2006, 06:21 PM
  #16  
glowz825
Registered User
 
glowz825's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: vrrrrrrt
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just their opinion==Those MT guys are very BMW biased
Old 08-24-2006, 06:29 PM
  #17  
genxnympho
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
genxnympho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suvlaki
Who cares if you're 0.10sec slower than the next guy?
Fact is most of the drivers on the road can't get that .10 of a second out of the car anyways. As long as it has a BMW or flashy badge on it to them it's "better".
Old 08-24-2006, 06:36 PM
  #18  
deezz
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
deezz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Honestly, like someone else said, it all about personal taste. Who is going to do a slalom course on the way to work everyday or braking as hard as they can from 70MPH on a regular basis? Bottom line...these guys are comparing cars at the extreme end of their performance.
Old 08-24-2006, 06:41 PM
  #19  
Act of God
Registered User
 
Act of God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by glowz825
Just their opinion==Those MT guys are very BMW biased
Hell yeah, they always have been


I really dig the Pontiac though. I might get one in a few years (used) for a little vert action
Old 08-24-2006, 06:55 PM
  #20  
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
davidv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thrill350z
lizard like styling
First time I heard that one.


Quick Reply: We Suck!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:27 AM.