wide
07-17-2002, 02:09 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: phoenix,az
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wide
I find it interesting that most people who have seen the car in person comment on how much better it looks in person vs pictures. I beieve it looks more agressive in person. I wonder if this is due to the with. It looks fairly narrow to me in the pixs, but this is not true. I did some research:
width:
350Z: 71.5
Boxter: 70.1
s2000: 68.9
What is the width of the Z32/33 .. I believe it is close to the 350Z?
width:
350Z: 71.5
Boxter: 70.1
s2000: 68.9
What is the width of the Z32/33 .. I believe it is close to the 350Z?
07-17-2002, 05:13 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Are you talking length?
Originally posted by revhappy
The numbers you are quoting are length. Even the Hummer I believe is not this wide.
The numbers you are quoting are length. Even the Hummer I believe is not this wide.
Trending Topics
07-19-2002, 01:31 AM
#9
Charter Member #79
Join Date: May 2002
Location: dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having finally seen the Z in person, I can completely agree that pictures do not do it justice. I think it is the width that pictures just can't show, also the flare of the fenders looks much more aggressive and strong in person than in any pictures. BTW... the Blue is f*cking fabulous in person, the pictures don't show the phenomenal (sp?) metallic finish to the Blue.
07-19-2002, 01:38 AM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: norcal
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by robbyn
BTW... the Blue is f*cking fabulous in person, the pictures don't show the phenomenal (sp?) metallic finish to the Blue.
BTW... the Blue is f*cking fabulous in person, the pictures don't show the phenomenal (sp?) metallic finish to the Blue.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post