Why does everyone talk **** bout the 350Z?
02-13-2007 | 12:42 PM
#201
Originally Posted by doug
do you have split personality.. because i am really confused as to how you can argue the point that the car is a 15 second car.. then in the same very thread post evidence its a 14 second car.. then come back a couple posts later and argue again its a 15 second car.. 
is that your thing? argue with yourself? try to prove something.. disprove it then try to prove it again?
well gentlemen i must say.. this rollercoaster is as twisted as the ones at six flags..
is that your thing? argue with yourself? try to prove something.. disprove it then try to prove it again?
well gentlemen i must say.. this rollercoaster is as twisted as the ones at six flags..
02-13-2007 | 12:42 PM
#202
Originally Posted by doug
maybe my problem with reading the english language is that you don't know how to use it properly.
02-13-2007 | 12:43 PM
#204
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by doug
do you have split personality.. because i am really confused as to how you can argue the point that the car is a 15 second car.. then in the same very thread post evidence its a 14 second car.. then come back a couple posts later and argue again its a 15 second car..
is that your thing? argue with yourself? try to prove something.. disprove it then try to prove it again?
well gentlemen i must say.. this rollercoaster is as twisted as the ones at six flags..
is that your thing? argue with yourself? try to prove something.. disprove it then try to prove it again?
well gentlemen i must say.. this rollercoaster is as twisted as the ones at six flags..
02-13-2007 | 12:44 PM
#205
Originally Posted by DROPPEDIT2WCE
I own a 350z and I am posting on my350z.com lol, .
02-13-2007 | 12:45 PM
#206
Originally Posted by Willie
a 14.9 car is a 15 second car if you use two significant figures.
02-13-2007 | 12:46 PM
#208
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by doug
no.. 14.9 car is a 14 second car... hence the 14 in the front of the .9... did you get that? did i lose you some where? shall i repeat it?
02-13-2007 | 12:47 PM
#209
Originally Posted by DROPPEDIT2WCE
that would be the case if my grammar was out of check bud nice try.
Originally Posted by DROPPEDIT2WCE
learn to read if you cant understand plain english boss 
what a joke
what a joke
02-13-2007 | 12:49 PM
#211
Originally Posted by Willie
If one person pulls of a number it does not mean that every one has the right to claim it. (I'm not saying what it runs and i really dont care to know)
you see how simple it is? now that wasn't very hard now was it?
02-13-2007 | 12:49 PM
#213
Originally Posted by doug
good thing you posted that.. due to your useless blabber i had become confused as to what twightlight zone portal we were in.
doug you are the man even if RSX's run 15-16 second 1/4 miles like we all have seen and read about. You are just the best that ever did it. No one can argue with you beacause you are just the God of all knowledge.
Guys my sincerest apology for missing one apostrophe back there, I hope this can help doug sleep at night
Last edited by DROPPEDIT2WCE; 02-13-2007 at 12:54 PM.
02-13-2007 | 12:51 PM
#214
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by doug
of course it doesn't.. however it means that if one person runs a 14.999999999999 with a stock RSX-S .. it means that a Stock RSX-S can run 14.9999999
you see how simple it is? now that wasn't very hard now was it?
you see how simple it is? now that wasn't very hard now was it?
02-13-2007 | 12:51 PM
#215
Originally Posted by DROPPEDIT2WCE
what is your problem anyway? you are a premier member on this site and want to side with rsx fanboys and downtalk to other Z owning members on the forum. Get ahold of yourself man its ok. Flame me for grammar and puntuation because an rsx runs 15's you are the man! what a joke so fed up with hearing the facts that you decide to personaly come at me.
had anyone claimed a stock RSX-S did 13's.. sure i would side with you.. but when you ignore facts and polute or knowledge with B.S. i have to stop you dead in your tracks
02-13-2007 | 12:54 PM
#218
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I owned an RSX-S w/ a greddy turbo, and I currently have a nissan 350Z
This is my opinion....
RSX I LOVED.. It is a great car. With n/a mods (CAI/exhaust/Hondata#4/hotwires/drag radials on stockies) I ran a 14.2 @ 98mph. In Sacramento that was a damn good time being that mid summer 100+ degrees 115+ at track level... Otehr RSX-S would run from low-mid 14s modded w/ n/a or 15s stock.
CLEARLY the RSX is not in the class of the Z. Stock Zs were running lower 14s at Sacramento. I was modded and had a hard time keeping up with a Z.
Than I got my turbo... almost was into the 12s (13.0xx) on drag radials....
*****RSX is more mod friendly than the Z N/A wise, and I think that is where they are trying to mess with us as Z owners. I ran my Z at the track when I first got it, and even though it was my first RWD car I was running as good as my RSX with N/A mods.... Actually went head to head with an RSX and killed it. He claims he launched ****ty, but he ran the same tiems all night.
Anyhow the moral to the story is mod for mod you will get more out of the RSX-S than the Z, but th Z is out of the factory about .9-1.2 seconds faster than the RSX. A modded Z with bolt ons was running low/mid 13s and the ONLY way a RSX can get tehre is eitehr spraying, or FI... END OF STORY.. (this is of course at my track. other tracks may vary in times) We are talking about a 15 second stock car against a 14 second stock car (at my track). The argument is just dumb
PIC OF MY RSX BELOW...
This is my opinion....
RSX I LOVED.. It is a great car. With n/a mods (CAI/exhaust/Hondata#4/hotwires/drag radials on stockies) I ran a 14.2 @ 98mph. In Sacramento that was a damn good time being that mid summer 100+ degrees 115+ at track level... Otehr RSX-S would run from low-mid 14s modded w/ n/a or 15s stock.
CLEARLY the RSX is not in the class of the Z. Stock Zs were running lower 14s at Sacramento. I was modded and had a hard time keeping up with a Z.
Than I got my turbo... almost was into the 12s (13.0xx) on drag radials....
*****RSX is more mod friendly than the Z N/A wise, and I think that is where they are trying to mess with us as Z owners. I ran my Z at the track when I first got it, and even though it was my first RWD car I was running as good as my RSX with N/A mods.... Actually went head to head with an RSX and killed it. He claims he launched ****ty, but he ran the same tiems all night.
Anyhow the moral to the story is mod for mod you will get more out of the RSX-S than the Z, but th Z is out of the factory about .9-1.2 seconds faster than the RSX. A modded Z with bolt ons was running low/mid 13s and the ONLY way a RSX can get tehre is eitehr spraying, or FI... END OF STORY.. (this is of course at my track. other tracks may vary in times) We are talking about a 15 second stock car against a 14 second stock car (at my track). The argument is just dumb
PIC OF MY RSX BELOW...
Last edited by pyropete; 02-13-2007 at 01:00 PM.
02-13-2007 | 12:58 PM
#220
Originally Posted by pyropete
I owned an RSX-S w/ a greddy turbo, and I currently have a nissan 350Z
This is my opinion....
RSX I LOVED.. It is a great car. With n/a mods (CAI/exhaust/Hondata#4/hotwires/drag radials on stockies) I ran a 14.2 @ 98mph. In Sacramento that was a damn good time being that mid summer 100+ degrees 115+ at track level... Otehr RSX-S would run from low-mid 14s modded w/ n/a or 15s stock.
CLEARLY the RSX is not in the class of the Z. Stock Zs were running lower 14s at Sacramento. I was modded and had a hard time keeping up with a Z.
Than I got my turbo... almost was into the 12s (13.0xx) on drag radials....
*****RSX is more mod friendly than the Z N/A wise, and I think that is where they are trying to mess with us as Z owners. I ran my Z at the track when I first got it, and even though it was my first RWD car I was running as good as my RSX with N/A mods.... Actually went head to head with an RSX and killed it. He claims he launched ****ty, but he ran the same tiems all night.
Anyhow the moral to the story is mod for mod you will get more out of the RSX-S than the Z, but th Z is out of the factory about .9-1.2 seconds faster than the RSX. A modded Z with bolt ons was running low/mid 13s and the ONLY way a RSX can get tehre is eitehr spraying, or FI... END OF STORY..
This is my opinion....
RSX I LOVED.. It is a great car. With n/a mods (CAI/exhaust/Hondata#4/hotwires/drag radials on stockies) I ran a 14.2 @ 98mph. In Sacramento that was a damn good time being that mid summer 100+ degrees 115+ at track level... Otehr RSX-S would run from low-mid 14s modded w/ n/a or 15s stock.
CLEARLY the RSX is not in the class of the Z. Stock Zs were running lower 14s at Sacramento. I was modded and had a hard time keeping up with a Z.
Than I got my turbo... almost was into the 12s (13.0xx) on drag radials....
*****RSX is more mod friendly than the Z N/A wise, and I think that is where they are trying to mess with us as Z owners. I ran my Z at the track when I first got it, and even though it was my first RWD car I was running as good as my RSX with N/A mods.... Actually went head to head with an RSX and killed it. He claims he launched ****ty, but he ran the same tiems all night.
Anyhow the moral to the story is mod for mod you will get more out of the RSX-S than the Z, but th Z is out of the factory about .9-1.2 seconds faster than the RSX. A modded Z with bolt ons was running low/mid 13s and the ONLY way a RSX can get tehre is eitehr spraying, or FI... END OF STORY..