rsx with bolts on (cams) can get low 13

 

lol!!!!! total we have all seen the links it is a 15 second car please understand that. I didnt follow a group of people that were all reading and copying those links I did it on my own to show the real performance of the type S. a 15 second car with lots of potential. 14.9 hats off wow truly amazing

 

responds awesome to cams, tuning

 

The way you try and school people in grammar is funny because your sentences are full of ****-ups. Who the.. ****.. types.. like.. this?

 

doug

 

How about this:

The RSX is a 15 second car. Sure, it's dipped into the 14's stock, but the majority is in the 15's. The Z can swing either way, since I've seen about the same running low 14's as running high 13's.

I guess if we use the logic that since a car ran a 14 then that makes it a 14 second car, then SRT4's are 13 second cars, STI's/STi's are 12 second cars, Evo's are 12 second cars etc.

And for the record, an i/rh/e/K-Pro RSX Type S can take a STOCK 350Z from a roll. No reason to argue it. Power to weight plays a huge roll in that.

 

this is more like it

 

Just incase you guys missed it: Doug isn't necessarily defending the RSX nor arguing the fact that it goes 14/15/16 secs. (I honestly don't think he cares either way)

It's the art of argumentation/stating facts and having valid points to backup your theories. If you respond with strictly opinionated statements such as "you're dumb, stfu, ignore!" it holds no value and therefore is an invalid statement toward the main goal of your argument.

Hats off to a fellow Philosophical thinker

 

Not at Sacramento Raceway... I raced my RSX EVERY WEEK when I had bolt ons, and the best I could get was low 14s. hondata/i/e/drag radials.

the stock Z would always contend with a bolt on RSX.. A bolt on to bolt on race the Z would win every time (unless he screwed the launch) Owning both cars, and racing every week I know I am right.

 

You should step out of the old school and come to the up to date world! You can build a 10 and I say high 10 sec to low 11's for 5 grand now a days for a honda. I have one if you need lots of details in how this works. Also F max was trash back in the day and still is, those kits were never good. Just over priced kits that had to much hype. Try new companys like full race, peak boost and some others that make kits for hondas now. They are what kits are like for 10 sec hondas. As for the K series and the B series being the same thing but a dif. year... are you out of your mind? They are so not the same it is scary. Take the monkeys from back in the day who knew how to work on B series and give them a K series, what do you get??? Some one standing there shaking there head trying to figure out what the h@ll was in front of them...lol. Honda has come a long way with those motors and are nothing like the old ones. After all that there are still way to many ricer out there that make honda a bad scene. I am no where near into hondas like I was years ago. All these high school kids watching F&F have made hondas one of the biggest joke cars to own. They are cheap and you can go to junk yards and pull motors for them now for under $100 to do swaps. Back in the day that **** was unherd of. That's why all these damn ricer have come out of the wood works causing me to grow up and buy a real car (like my Z) and mod that. Not to many high schoolers can buy Z's from what I can tell. So to me a Z is more for the older guys who want a nice car without all the rice. By the way I am only 28 and to me that is older. Sorry for all the honda BS on here but I needed to straighen that out.

 

hondata reflash or k-pro?


did u miss the part where i say cam?

 

lol at all this defending of the Z, im not here o bash the Z because its a great car but the discussion here is if an rsx TYPE S can hit 14s stock and yes, even more so in 05-06s can a stock rsx-s take a 350z? NO lol guys hold onto your ***** please <3

 

I was old school.. This was 2003-2004 when I had my RSX.. It was a reflash (#4). I didn't get the kpro until I got the turbo put in.

Seriously though, this is the Sacramento Raceway we are talking about here.... When I was turbo I would be consistant low 13s. Got within a tenth of a second from the 12s, ther was NO bolt on RSX even coming close to low 13s. I think the best one was that guy who totally gutted his car, put on slicks, totally did an engine rebuild and ran a 13.1, but that was not an RSX, it was like a shell almost. The best people ran with just bolt ons whenever I was there racing was the high 13s low 14s.

The stock Zs were always hittin the high 13s low 14s. light modded mid to high 13s and medium to heavy n/a would be low 13s. It was no contest. If a Z is modded it will beat a modded RSX.

 

Yes and RSX-S can hit 14s stock. I hit 14.8 stock in mine... Majority of the people at my track would run low 15s though. Depends 100% on the driver. The car is capable, but the driver is its downfall.

The Z can hit 14s easy on a bad run stock. low 14s is a bad run... high 13s is a good run. The Z is about a second faster stock for stock.

 

Endless 350Z vs RSX thread......

 

quit the *****ing between 350z's and your stupid honduhs



cant match my ****in chevy *****es

 

This is turning in to hondatech here. Why do we just get down to what's everyone seems to keep asking.

1. can a stock RSX type s beat a stock Z? (A base RSX is not even close cause a K20a2 sucks big time)

2. can a moded RSX type s beat a stock Z?

3. Can a moded RSX type s beat a moded Z?

those seem to be the main ones I keep reading over and over again. So get to post up the answers.

 

ay now what in teh hell is that bull****

yall edit these fukin words or what now

 

You're gay. Take your piece of **** and roll out.

 

I don't know if you're blind or something, but those questions have been answered.

But in case you missed it...

1. No
2. Yes
3. Depends