Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

2006 350z

Old Apr 4, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #21  
350Z-2006's Avatar
350Z-2006
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: K.C., Kansas
Default Just purchased 06/MT march 30

I just purchased my base Red 2006 MT on Friday March 30.
It had 100 miles on it.
Obviously taking my chances on getting a "oil consumer".
Absolutely love the car.
At least I know the possible problems and will start documentation beginning with the first oil change and all that follow.
The way is see it I'll find 3 possibilities.
1) no oil consumption problems
2) oil consumption problems that will be fixed, with possibilities of a fix to the positive/better.
3)problems with unsatisfactory fixes.
I believe my dealer will help me in anyway they can.
Another plus is many have documented problems before me so their pressures should help those that follow.
I will definitely keep an update with my purchase.

What a joy of a car to drive

At least in my case from knowledge from this group I now know proper channels to help get things resolved through the dealer,and if not..... BBB Auto line & lemon law guidelines.

I do not expect any problems but feel from the knowledge of others this will help, And I can and will benifit from their experiences.

Todd Jones
Lincoln, NE.

With the full 3yr bumber-bumper & 5 yr powertrain I'm not worried.........yet.
The price was hard to refuse with my budget.
MSRP $29,135 for $24.000

.


.

Last edited by 350Z-2006; Apr 4, 2007 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #22  
aren21's Avatar
aren21
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: So. cal.
Default

just save yourself the headache and get the 07. Id rather have a bump on the hood than an oil burner!!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 05:43 AM
  #23  
dbasal's Avatar
dbasal
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by shanki456
Hey guys, Just a simple questions, once answered I don't mind if a moderator locks this thread. Im going to the dealership tomorrow, and I was wondering before I buy an 06 z, what is the best way to tell if it has the oil consumption problem? Is there any way to tell except for driving until it lets you know that you need oil?
If it is a manual transmission it has the problem. Buy an 07.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 05:47 AM
  #24  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by ML2000
I have an 06 (made 9/05) with 10500 miles on it and have never had the oil consumption problem. I think your best bet would be to buy an early made 06 or just get an 07. Just my 2 cents.

Matt
My '06 was born on 10/06. Current mileage @ 2,000 miles. I have been watching my oil like a hawk during breakin.
I've been driving it pretty hard since breakin. So far it's consuming @ 1/4qt per 1000 miles.
My '04 Z consumed about as much oil (I had it for almost 3 years).

Last edited by gothchick; Apr 5, 2007 at 03:55 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #25  
Wraith's Avatar
Wraith
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Palm Desert, Ca
Default

I have an 06 with mine havin a birthdate of 02/06 and i dont have a oil consumotion problem. Having said that get he 07, its all around better
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 06:33 AM
  #26  
ke0ki2k's Avatar
ke0ki2k
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Default

I have an 06' 6MT and the only oil consumption problems ive had are after hard driving. Just daily driving doesnt produce any consumption problems...just gotta put in a 1/4 of a bottle of oil in after I go to the gap :/. the extra grand or two is worth it for the 07's though. Theyre rated at "306 hp 268 tq" but they were dynod on new SAE standards. On the dynos 06's were dynod on (that rated ours at 300 hp 260 tq) theyd run closer to 320 hp and 280 torque...theyre considerably faster...mid-low 13's in the quarter.

Last edited by ke0ki2k; Apr 5, 2007 at 06:36 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #27  
Bevo's Avatar
Bevo
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Mine was built in 02/2006, and it burns about 1 qt/ 4k miles
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #28  
xProbeGTx's Avatar
xProbeGTx
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Default

I bought my 2006 manual transmission in February 07. Dealership told me it was a 2006.5 year model. I have a little over 2,500 miles on it & have had no oil burning issues & have checked my oil level frequently because of the noted problems with the 06 model. I think either choice 06 or 07 is great. Just keep in mind that there have been issues with most of the earlier 06 models.

Good luck in your decision.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #29  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

05 6mt G35 Sedan REV with 28k of miles before I sold it. Driven at Road Race Tracks and Autox a lot. Never burned a drop of oil. Used Amsoil 5w30.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #30  
I1DER's Avatar
I1DER
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 0
From: Hood Canal, WA.
Default

I've a manual '06, built in June '06 and now with 20,000 miles on it. Watch the oil regularly and consumption is about 1 qt/5500 miles. When newer, it was more but I was going WOT daily(possible link). If you change oil before these milages, it really isn't an issue. I agree about a lot of the posts that you should look at the '07s, but not because of the oil thing. Sounds like a good price you've got going though on the '06.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #31  
pimpsahab's Avatar
pimpsahab
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
Default

Originally Posted by shanki456
you can never believe them, they all lie!

i know...when i bought my Z the salesman said " its way faster than a new M3"...and i was like "ummmm....NO!"
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #32  
shanki456's Avatar
shanki456
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Haverhill, MA
Default

Originally Posted by pimpsahab
i know...when i bought my Z the salesman said " its way faster than a new M3"...and i was like "ummmm....NO!"
it is on a track ahah :P
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #33  
Sunset350ZR's Avatar
Sunset350ZR
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 829
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

i could not get a decent reading on the stick and was thinking I had oil consumption of about a quart in a little under 1200 miles but I could not even add a quart without it being overfilled. moral of story our dip sticks suck and make sure you are really gtting consumption.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #34  
certz656's Avatar
certz656
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: central nevada
Default

My 06 ZR M/T has about 2500 miles, it's been driven fairly hard or fast, so far no detectible oil useage. When I say hard driving, I've had it up to 130mph+ on a couple of occassions, a few hard launches w/ no wheelspinning, not into replacing tires any sooner than they will melt away w/o my help. So far I'm happy, also had an 03 Z, enjoyed it too, but the 06 ZR is a much improved sportscar.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #35  
Cheezwiz's Avatar
Cheezwiz
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis
Default

Originally Posted by Bevo
Mine burns 1 qt/ 4k miles, but I treat it as normal for a sports car

...
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #36  
Bevo's Avatar
Bevo
New Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Well, I change my engine oil before 4k miles anyways, so it doesnt really bother me that much
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #37  
Cheezwiz's Avatar
Cheezwiz
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis
Default

Originally Posted by HighwaySpeed
'06/'07 with 5AT have no oil consumption problems so far.
That's because they are not RevUp motors.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 04:51 AM
  #38  
trains1937's Avatar
trains1937
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 660
Likes: 143
From: Tucson, Arizona
Default

I am a little puzzled by the many complaints about oil consumption with the 2006 Z. I have a new one that I bought about 3 weeks ago and haven't even reached 1000 miles yet. Being a believer in Consumers Reports I read their review of the 2006 Z. It was very positive and one of their recommended cars. I checked out the frequency of repair rates for the 2006 in their April auto issue. The Z is significantly below average in repairs in virtually all areas. Nothing but a straight line of little red circles. No indication of engine problems. In fact, this goes for the 2004, 2005, and 2006. They don't usually publish figures on a car unless they get a fairly large number of responses on their auto survey. I would assume that, if excess oil consumption were a problem, it would be reflected in the ratings, particularly those for major engine problems. Is it possible that the oil consumption problem is being blown out of proportion? Could things like lack of adherence to the break in period and driving style have anything to do with it?

Bob
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 04:59 AM
  #39  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by trains1937
I am a little puzzled by the many complaints about oil consumption with the 2006 Z. I have a new one that I bought about 3 weeks ago and haven't even reached 1000 miles yet. Being a believer in Consumers Reports I read their review of the 2006 Z. It was very positive and one of their recommended cars. I checked out the frequency of repair rates for the 2006 in their April auto issue. The Z is significantly below average in repairs in virtually all areas. Nothing but a straight line of little red circles. No indication of engine problems. In fact, this goes for the 2004, 2005, and 2006. They don't usually publish figures on a car unless they get a fairly large number of responses on their auto survey. I would assume that, if excess oil consumption were a problem, it would be reflected in the ratings, particularly those for major engine problems. Is it possible that the oil consumption problem is being blown out of proportion? Could things like lack of adherence to the break in period and driving style have anything to do with it?

Bob
The complaints and problems that you read hear are anecdotal at best. Certainly relevant, but far from statistically valid. What I see is a placebo effect. Its borderline hysteria. A member mentions a problem, then others will comment “Oh my God, the same thing happened to me!”
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #40  
PrinceFemi's Avatar
PrinceFemi
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: mississippi
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
The complaints and problems that you read hear are anecdotal at best. Certainly relevant, but far from statistically valid. What I see is a placebo effect. Its borderline hysteria. A member mentions a problem, then others will comment “Oh my God, the same thing happened to me!”
+1..... I agree with you 1000%
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:13 PM.