Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

C&D: Z vs TT vs RX8 vs ShelbyGT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2007 | 01:51 PM
  #1  
md350's Avatar
md350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default C&D: Z vs TT vs RX8 vs ShelbyGT

The new Car & Driver compares the newest Z, Audi TT, Mazda RX-8 and Ford Shelby GT.

The Z and Shelby GT were pretty much tied for the fastest

1/4 mile
13.7 @ 104 (Z)
13.7 @ 104 (Shelby GT)
14.6 @ 97 (TT)
15.0 @ 93 (RX-8)

0-30mph
2.0 (Z)
2.1 (Shelby GT)
2.2 (RX-8)
2.4 (TT)

0-60mph
5.1 (Shelby GT)
5.2 (Z)
6.0 (TT)
6.5 (RX-8)

0-100mph
12.6 (Z)
12.6 (Shelby GT)
15.4 (TT)
18.0 (RX-8)

LB per BHP
10.9 (Z)
11.1 (Shelby GT)
13.2 (RX-8)
14.8 (TT)
Old 04-23-2007 | 01:59 PM
  #2  
FairladyZ06's Avatar
FairladyZ06
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: .88 Mach at FL 410
Default

Thats what I'm talkin about! I cant be more glad I own a Z, its better than a Shelby GT! Poor mustangs.
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
Playboy's Z's Avatar
Playboy's Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

interesting stats, z ftw, but either the driver sucked or something was wrong with the rx8 those have been known to run low 14s
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:04 PM
  #4  
jimmyloose's Avatar
jimmyloose
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

Originally Posted by md350
0-100mph
12.6 (Z)
12.6 (Shelby GT)
15.4 (TT)
18.0 (RX-8)
aerodynamics FTW.
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:06 PM
  #5  
Blu_Blur's Avatar
Blu_Blur
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,261
Likes: 3
From: Cypress, TX (Houston)
Default

Interesting and....wow! Go Z!
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
koreanwith350z's Avatar
koreanwith350z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: oregon
Default

Z's rule!! lol wow rx8 FTL...
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:25 PM
  #7  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default

hahaha, thats sweeet, I'm so glad I didn't buy an RX-8
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:27 PM
  #8  
FairladyZ06's Avatar
FairladyZ06
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: .88 Mach at FL 410
Default

My brother is pissed! hahah! I showed him this thread and he couldnt believe it. He has an 06 RX-8 and his car is beautiful and pretty quick at that. Either way, he wants to sell it and buy a Z
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:48 PM
  #9  
youngZ33's Avatar
youngZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default

is there a link to the article?
Old 04-23-2007 | 02:55 PM
  #10  
md350's Avatar
md350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by youngZ33
is there a link to the article?
No, its from Car & Driver magazine.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:01 PM
  #11  
deviantZ's Avatar
deviantZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: FL/DE
Default

I still think it's such a shame that Mazda put up the fugly, slow RX-8 as the replacement for the timeless beauty of the last gen RX-7. For shame Mazda.

Go Z.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:04 PM
  #12  
OCZTrack's Avatar
OCZTrack
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Ocean City, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by md350
No, its from Car & Driver magazine.
Be the champion of this thread and scan the article and post...we wanna read...
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:11 PM
  #13  
Guy's Avatar
Guy
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by deviantZ
I still think it's such a shame that Mazda put up the fugly, slow RX-8 as the replacement for the timeless beauty of the last gen RX-7. For shame Mazda.

Go Z.

Agreed. I don't want a practical sports car.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:12 PM
  #14  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,913
Likes: 2,448
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

Nice 0-60 time clocked for the Z. Sorry-*** performance from the Shelby.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

The Z also had the fastest lap time among the four, but C&D ranked it third place overall- right after the Mustang. The RX-8 was placed number one due to beter materials, fit & finish, rear seat space, and driving dynamics. Whatever, the Z was the cheapest and performed the best. Exactly the kind of car I wanted- no frills and no wild amenities, just solid performnace for the track days.
The new TT was almost as fast as the Z on track though, with only 200hp and front wheel drive. The TT RS with AWD and the 2.5 turbo five will be something to reckon with if the base version is already so quick around a track.
Will
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:31 PM
  #16  
CaliTouring's Avatar
CaliTouring
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
Default

Awsome!!!!!!
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:44 PM
  #17  
toca07's Avatar
toca07
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: san bernardino, ca
Default

that a bad time for the gt normal v 8 mustangs run 13.5. i use to own a rx8 i ran a 14.5 with it stock so those to times had a bad driver behind them
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:46 PM
  #18  
deviantZ's Avatar
deviantZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: FL/DE
Default

Originally Posted by Resolute
The RX-8 was placed number one due to beter materials, fit & finish, rear seat space, and driving dynamics.
I guess I'm going to have to go test drive the RX-8 again to see what the hell these fools at C&D are talking about. Cause from what I remember from my test drive before, it just wasn't on par.

rear seat space? wtf? that's humurous. I dont think there even enough room back there to properly fit a baby seat.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:50 PM
  #19  
Steve-O Z33's Avatar
Steve-O Z33
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, NC
Default

RX8 handles good... and that's it. The Z is better in every other aspect. It kills me that people complain about the Z and trade it in for an RX8.
Old 04-23-2007 | 03:53 PM
  #20  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by toca07
that a bad time for the gt normal v 8 mustangs run 13.5. i use to own a rx8 i ran a 14.5 with it stock so those to times had a bad driver behind them
VeeTec has gotten his 07 Z to a 13.3 with clutch problems.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:30 PM.