downside of ZZZZZZ
Originally Posted by nicholasm617
hahahaha i get 18 if i really try to behave i can pull off 19-20, but on average daily i get around 15-16. the other day i managed to get 8.5 on the display hahaha
you really cant care, i dont...id ratehr drive it like i want and face it that i waste gas, and i never care about gas prices cus ive not once seen anyone or myself actually say no im not buying gas its too expensive ill wait, im gonna buy it anyway so whats it matter what it costs?
you really cant care, i dont...id ratehr drive it like i want and face it that i waste gas, and i never care about gas prices cus ive not once seen anyone or myself actually say no im not buying gas its too expensive ill wait, im gonna buy it anyway so whats it matter what it costs?
Originally Posted by jamnew
+2 I would like to know too. I recently drove a fully loaded 2007 Altima loaner from the stealership and it had a MPG saver readout that showed when you were getting the best mileage. When I coasted to the light in neutral, that's when mpg really shot up. If your foot is off the gas how you be wasting gas?
Originally Posted by jdm21bmx
So how does coasting in neutral waste gas again?
To the OP, if you're dissappointed in the mpg you should have seen my trying to haul 2 yards of bark mulch home.....man, talk about a downside. These things have a terrible bed for hauling. Who would have guessed?
Originally Posted by noir06
Because 2+2=5 now. I figure as long as we're starting some myths we might as well start one that revolutionizes the whole number system.
It is also illegal in Europe to coast around in neutral, but there are other reasons for that.
As far as what I'm getting, I'm mixed city/highway and get 20.5 MPG and couldn't be happier with it; that's better than we get on my dad's Legacy 2.5GT and better, in fact, than I used to get on my Scion tC that I traded for this car, which is entirely due to gearing (way too short on the 5MT tC). For a 3.5liter motor that cranks out 306 peak horsepower and still gives decent midrange torque, to me, 20 MPG mixed cycle is great!
-Ed
EDIT: PS I agree with the other posters in terms of ways to save fuel; try to drive WOT when accelerating and shift short but do not lug (i.e. shift under 3,000 whenever possible--I generally shift right at 2,000 RPM). Driving WOT at low RPM reduces pumping losses, but obviously going WOT in 1st gear guarantees shifting crazy soon. Also, even though you may be in the interest of saving fuel costs, absolutely do not lug your car by shifting too short--the damaged caused in the long run will cost you more than burning a little extra gas to shift appropriately. An extreme example of lugging is being at street crawling speed, upshifting to 6th gear, putting the engine at the 500rpm level and then flooring it to accelerate--lugging is bad because it causes oil starvation from oil pump velocity.
Last edited by EddNog; Jul 10, 2007 at 12:51 PM.
Originally Posted by EddNog
When you're in gear and off the throttle, it does not apply any fuel at all. If you are disengaged from gear (on the clutch) or in neutral, the engine applies fuel to maintain idle. That's why staying in gear when coasting uses less fuel than leaving it in neutral.
Originally Posted by EddNog
When you're in gear and off the throttle, it does not apply any fuel at all. If you are disengaged from gear (on the clutch) or in neutral, the engine applies fuel to maintain idle. That's why staying in gear when coasting uses less fuel than leaving it in neutral.
It is also illegal in Europe to coast around in neutral, but there are other reasons for that.
As far as what I'm getting, I'm mixed city/highway and get 20.5 MPG and couldn't be happier with it; that's better than we get on my dad's Legacy 2.5GT and better, in fact, than I used to get on my Scion tC that I traded for this car, which is entirely due to gearing (way too short on the 5MT tC). For a 3.5liter motor that cranks out 306 peak horsepower and still gives decent midrange torque, to me, 20 MPG mixed cycle is great!
-Ed
EDIT: PS I agree with the other posters in terms of ways to save fuel; try to drive WOT when accelerating and shift short but do not lug (i.e. shift under 3,000 whenever possible--I generally shift right at 2,000 RPM). Driving WOT at low RPM reduces pumping losses, but obviously going WOT in 1st gear guarantees shifting crazy soon. Also, even though you may be in the interest of saving fuel costs, absolutely do not lug your car by shifting too short--the damaged caused in the long run will cost you more than burning a little extra gas to shift appropriately. An extreme example of lugging is being at street crawling speed, upshifting to 6th gear, putting the engine at the 500rpm level and then flooring it to accelerate--lugging is bad because it causes oil starvation from oil pump velocity.
It is also illegal in Europe to coast around in neutral, but there are other reasons for that.
As far as what I'm getting, I'm mixed city/highway and get 20.5 MPG and couldn't be happier with it; that's better than we get on my dad's Legacy 2.5GT and better, in fact, than I used to get on my Scion tC that I traded for this car, which is entirely due to gearing (way too short on the 5MT tC). For a 3.5liter motor that cranks out 306 peak horsepower and still gives decent midrange torque, to me, 20 MPG mixed cycle is great!
-Ed
EDIT: PS I agree with the other posters in terms of ways to save fuel; try to drive WOT when accelerating and shift short but do not lug (i.e. shift under 3,000 whenever possible--I generally shift right at 2,000 RPM). Driving WOT at low RPM reduces pumping losses, but obviously going WOT in 1st gear guarantees shifting crazy soon. Also, even though you may be in the interest of saving fuel costs, absolutely do not lug your car by shifting too short--the damaged caused in the long run will cost you more than burning a little extra gas to shift appropriately. An extreme example of lugging is being at street crawling speed, upshifting to 6th gear, putting the engine at the 500rpm level and then flooring it to accelerate--lugging is bad because it causes oil starvation from oil pump velocity.
Originally Posted by Ankhharu
My RPM gauge would disagree with your flawed theory.
-Ed







