Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

downside of ZZZZZZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #41  
jolt3500's Avatar
jolt3500
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, WI
Default

20mpg! I only get like 17.. <=== Lead foot
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #42  
pimpin714style's Avatar
pimpin714style
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nicholasm617
hahahaha i get 18 if i really try to behave i can pull off 19-20, but on average daily i get around 15-16. the other day i managed to get 8.5 on the display hahaha
you really cant care, i dont...id ratehr drive it like i want and face it that i waste gas, and i never care about gas prices cus ive not once seen anyone or myself actually say no im not buying gas its too expensive ill wait, im gonna buy it anyway so whats it matter what it costs?
+1 i must agree..drive it and enjoy it
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #43  
pimpin714style's Avatar
pimpin714style
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ankhharu
Wasting gas while coasting in neutral? lol. This is how urban myths get started, lol.
no its true..it happened to a friend of mine...lol...im b-****tin.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #44  
GonZ's Avatar
GonZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,212
Likes: 1
From: LaLaLand
Default

Originally Posted by jamnew
+2 I would like to know too. I recently drove a fully loaded 2007 Altima loaner from the stealership and it had a MPG saver readout that showed when you were getting the best mileage. When I coasted to the light in neutral, that's when mpg really shot up. If your foot is off the gas how you be wasting gas?
+10
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #45  
jdm21bmx's Avatar
jdm21bmx
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: tucson,az
Default

So how does coasting in neutral waste gas again?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #46  
ravensaxe's Avatar
ravensaxe
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

I get about 18mpg average. I bought a sportscar and I'm not going to pussyfoot it to save gas mileage, whats the point of owning one then?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #47  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

wow I get about 400m to a tank, and I have somewhat a heavy foot!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #48  
Olivia's Avatar
Olivia
Z-GiRL
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
From: shreveport, la
Default

yep. i get anywhere between 350 to 400 to a tank =)
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #49  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

When I had my Z I'd get anywhere between 300-350 per tank.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #50  
nzpv03's Avatar
nzpv03
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: Palos Verdes, CA
Default

my last tank i did exclusively city driving and messing around with friends and stuff and got a whopping 168 miles to a tank hahahaha wow that was horrible
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #51  
jolt3500's Avatar
jolt3500
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Hartland, WI
Default

wtf! I can only squeeze out 280ish in my 05 touring
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #52  
Bumpinjeep's Avatar
Bumpinjeep
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,743
Likes: 25
From: Bellevue Wa
Default

The doors are very long, thats just about it on the complaints side.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #53  
Z-T's Avatar
Z-T
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

You're complaining about mpg when you drive a dedicated sports car with a 3.5L V6 engine?
Seriously I hope you're kidding.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #54  
noir06's Avatar
noir06
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by jdm21bmx
So how does coasting in neutral waste gas again?
Because 2+2=5 now. I figure as long as we're starting some myths we might as well start one that revolutionizes the whole number system.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #55  
noir06's Avatar
noir06
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default

To the OP, if you're dissappointed in the mpg you should have seen my trying to haul 2 yards of bark mulch home.....man, talk about a downside. These things have a terrible bed for hauling. Who would have guessed?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #56  
zerohurst's Avatar
zerohurst
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

I get about 20-22mpg when I shift early (3000-4000rpm). But when I shift between 4000-5000rmp it goes down to about 17-19mpg.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #57  
EddNog's Avatar
EddNog
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Scarsdale, NY
Default

Originally Posted by noir06
Because 2+2=5 now. I figure as long as we're starting some myths we might as well start one that revolutionizes the whole number system.
When you're in gear and off the throttle, it does not apply any fuel at all. If you are disengaged from gear (on the clutch) or in neutral, the engine applies fuel to maintain idle. That's why staying in gear when coasting uses less fuel than leaving it in neutral.

It is also illegal in Europe to coast around in neutral, but there are other reasons for that.

As far as what I'm getting, I'm mixed city/highway and get 20.5 MPG and couldn't be happier with it; that's better than we get on my dad's Legacy 2.5GT and better, in fact, than I used to get on my Scion tC that I traded for this car, which is entirely due to gearing (way too short on the 5MT tC). For a 3.5liter motor that cranks out 306 peak horsepower and still gives decent midrange torque, to me, 20 MPG mixed cycle is great!

-Ed

EDIT: PS I agree with the other posters in terms of ways to save fuel; try to drive WOT when accelerating and shift short but do not lug (i.e. shift under 3,000 whenever possible--I generally shift right at 2,000 RPM). Driving WOT at low RPM reduces pumping losses, but obviously going WOT in 1st gear guarantees shifting crazy soon. Also, even though you may be in the interest of saving fuel costs, absolutely do not lug your car by shifting too short--the damaged caused in the long run will cost you more than burning a little extra gas to shift appropriately. An extreme example of lugging is being at street crawling speed, upshifting to 6th gear, putting the engine at the 500rpm level and then flooring it to accelerate--lugging is bad because it causes oil starvation from oil pump velocity.

Last edited by EddNog; Jul 10, 2007 at 12:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #58  
noir06's Avatar
noir06
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by EddNog
When you're in gear and off the throttle, it does not apply any fuel at all. If you are disengaged from gear (on the clutch) or in neutral, the engine applies fuel to maintain idle. That's why staying in gear when coasting uses less fuel than leaving it in neutral.
So you're saying that when you're coasting in gear, no fuel is being burned? As in, it would be the same if I reached up and shut the key off? I don't think so..... Does your car go silent when you're coasting in gear? LOL
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #59  
hollywood_93b's Avatar
hollywood_93b
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by EddNog
When you're in gear and off the throttle, it does not apply any fuel at all. If you are disengaged from gear (on the clutch) or in neutral, the engine applies fuel to maintain idle. That's why staying in gear when coasting uses less fuel than leaving it in neutral.

It is also illegal in Europe to coast around in neutral, but there are other reasons for that.

As far as what I'm getting, I'm mixed city/highway and get 20.5 MPG and couldn't be happier with it; that's better than we get on my dad's Legacy 2.5GT and better, in fact, than I used to get on my Scion tC that I traded for this car, which is entirely due to gearing (way too short on the 5MT tC). For a 3.5liter motor that cranks out 306 peak horsepower and still gives decent midrange torque, to me, 20 MPG mixed cycle is great!

-Ed

EDIT: PS I agree with the other posters in terms of ways to save fuel; try to drive WOT when accelerating and shift short but do not lug (i.e. shift under 3,000 whenever possible--I generally shift right at 2,000 RPM). Driving WOT at low RPM reduces pumping losses, but obviously going WOT in 1st gear guarantees shifting crazy soon. Also, even though you may be in the interest of saving fuel costs, absolutely do not lug your car by shifting too short--the damaged caused in the long run will cost you more than burning a little extra gas to shift appropriately. An extreme example of lugging is being at street crawling speed, upshifting to 6th gear, putting the engine at the 500rpm level and then flooring it to accelerate--lugging is bad because it causes oil starvation from oil pump velocity.
My RPM gauge would disagree with your flawed theory.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #60  
EddNog's Avatar
EddNog
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Scarsdale, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Ankhharu
My RPM gauge would disagree with your flawed theory.
Not sure what you mean; if you leave it in gear, it's going to indicate whatever RPM the engine is rotating at, which has everything to do with wheel speed and gear, and nothing to do with throttle input. If you put it into neutral, RPM drops to idle until gear is re-engaged or throttle is applied.

-Ed
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM.