Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Top 10 Sports Cars 350Z = #3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 04:11 AM
  #81  
TheBlackPearlZ's Avatar
TheBlackPearlZ
Banned
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Bragg, NC / Fishers, IN
Default

Mustang FTMFL!!! ^and i have to agree with tienlo...theres no way a mustang would be in front of any of those cars in a REAL sports car comparison. thats why i dont trust internet ratings.

how can you create an article about the top 10 sports cars if your basing it on web hits...****, all the soccer moms in the world could start looking at minivans...raising the hit number...would they then throw that into the top 10 as well??
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 06:29 AM
  #82  
Frizzle's Avatar
Frizzle
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by Jabdo233


The Mustang GT and GT500 are overweight pieces of crap with exceedingly inefficient engines and crappy workmanship all around. They have pitiful handling, trust me I know I have driven a GT, and it is ONLY a straight line car... it is far from being a "sports" car.

The GTR on the other hand has none of the crappy qualities of the GT... other than the 2+2 seater arrangement, which I don't consider a feature that excludes a car from being classified as a sports car.
I will agree that the Mustang is heavy. However the 305Z is no light weight by any means.

inefficent engines? Its a 4.6L modular V8 is a fairly stout engine that produces 300HP and 320 lb-ft of torque. They designed the engine to produce more torque then horse power as the car is designed to be a Pony Car. I will say the fit n finish in the mustang is not as nice interior vs interior of the 350Z.



Originally Posted by iceagetlc
Ferrari has had back seats, btw.
Many Porsche's have back seats.


However as it seems to have slipped past many of those here, the list is as a result of internet searches, I am suprised that the Honda Civic SI did not make the list but i guess they excluded FWD cars thank god. While it is nice to see the 350Z obtain some recognition in making the top 3 there isn't quite much to be discussed.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 06:36 AM
  #83  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

BTW guys, the motor in the Mustang is detuned for 87 octane...

My roommate dyno'd 290whp with just an intake, exhaust, 93 octane, and simple tune.

Everyone knows how much $$$ it takes a Z to get there
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #84  
asiandreamer's Avatar
asiandreamer
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: yoyoyoyo usa
Default

a mazda3 hatchback can handle good in autoX.
so its a sports car? nooo...

i think alot of us have the "euro" view of sports car while MSN and some ppl have the "American" view of sports car.
Americans think 0-60 = sports car.
Euros think "nurburbung or whatever" = sports car.

right? I like the euro way.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #85  
YuraBecker's Avatar
YuraBecker
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Default

honestly I think that is kind of embaracing that the Z is on there, I mean it's there with saturn, mustang, solstice, miata, and eclipse which are completly poser cars. That list is a complete joke and makes the Z look bad.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #86  
Z-T's Avatar
Z-T
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Not sure why people need MSN or some rag to tell them where their car ranks in popularity. Who cares.
WTF, drive, and the rest is totally pointless.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #87  
asiandreamer's Avatar
asiandreamer
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: yoyoyoyo usa
Default

ya i agree.

forget MSN's list and just be happy your car is faster than almost the whole entire list! (and that most americans cannot afford a Z smartly!)
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #88  
Frizzle's Avatar
Frizzle
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by YuraBecker
honestly I think that is kind of embaracing that the Z is on there, I mean it's there with saturn, mustang, solstice, miata, and eclipse which are completly poser cars. That list is a complete joke and makes the Z look bad.
The saturn, miata, and solstice are sports cars. 2 seater RWD cars not all sport cars are ment for speed but for handeling. "An automobile aerodynamically shaped one-passenger or two-passenger vehicle having a low center of gravity and steering and suspension designed for precise control at high speeds."


Lets be honest, you did not buy your Z because it was fast in a 1/4 mile did you?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #89  
HDPDZO6's Avatar
HDPDZO6
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by YuraBecker
honestly I think that is kind of embaracing that the Z is on there, I mean it's there with saturn, mustang, solstice, miata, and eclipse which are completly poser cars. That list is a complete joke and makes the Z look bad.
Considering the Saturn outperforms the 350Z (holds a tougher SCCA classification), I would say you don't know what you are talking about.

Hell, even a Miata handles better than the Z.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JjL
East Canada
10
Jun 12, 2019 03:04 AM
Vigman
Maintenance & Repair
17
Nov 17, 2015 04:34 AM
350zrn35
Photoshop
1
Sep 14, 2015 06:53 PM
lolsupfoo
SoCal Marketplace
0
Sep 9, 2015 12:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM.