Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Weight of Z350 vs. other cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
agisd's Avatar
agisd
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default Weight of Z350 vs. other cars

What is the weight of the Z vs competitive cars like

BMW 330ci
Subaru STi
S2000
Audi TT 225
G35C

What can we remove on the Z in order to reduce the weight (for a track day)?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 11:18 PM
  #2  
failsafe's Avatar
failsafe
....for your health
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 1
From: Raider Nation
Default

http://autos.yahoo.com/
Spare tire, jack, trunk carpet etc.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 02:45 AM
  #3  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

Maybe you should learn how to spell 350Z instead of Z350...
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 03:00 AM
  #4  
spinninbackfist's Avatar
spinninbackfist
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Beverly, MA
Default

Originally posted by Nissan350ZTT
Maybe you should learn how to spell 350Z instead of Z350...
May it was a play on words like " The 350 " = " Z350 "
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 07:43 AM
  #5  
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 1
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

Originally posted by spinninbackfist
May it was a play on words like " The 350 " = " Z350 "
Maybe I jumped the gun, my bad. I don't know though, I always put (and see others put) 350Z, 350, or Z. Oh well.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
350zroadster's Avatar
350zroadster
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,249
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Default It's listed on Nissan's webpage

Nissan 350Z 3196
Honda S2000 2809
Porsche Boxster 2944
Porsche Boxster 3021
BMW Z3 3.0 Roadster 2910
Audi TT 225hp AWD 3274
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
racin's Avatar
racin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Winter Haven, Florida
Default

Actually, our Project NT350 weighed in at 3267 pounds, with only 3/4 tank of gas, spare tire and hardware removed (aprx 30 pounds), and our BMK installed (weight savings of 21 pounds with BMK). Weight distribution is 55% front, and 45% rear. If you add back the weight of the battery and spare stuff, you are well over 3300 pounds, and you still haven't filled the gas tank, which is what curb weight is supposed to include. Nissan fudged a bit here. It may have gotten them a better fuel economy rating. Not sure what it is.

You can see more at www.ntechengineering.com . For specifics on our car, go to the Project NT350 link.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2003 | 07:51 AM
  #8  
mark350's Avatar
mark350
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: sitting too close to the tv
Default

Wow...Racin, your site has some good info on it about our Z's.....alot of good brake info especially.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #9  
stevew's Avatar
stevew
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

To provide a more marketable price, Nissan utilizes one platform for it's rear-drive vehicles, ie the 350Z, the G35 and the FX45. The benefit is lower cost, the downside is that the Z shares some, not all, of the heavy duty complonents with the latter vehicles. I think they did a great job. The alternative would be to build a platform unique to the Z, but with that would come at a higher price to the consumer.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2003 | 04:04 PM
  #10  
racin's Avatar
racin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Winter Haven, Florida
Default

Thank you, Mark. As stated on the web site, we are trying to identify all of the performance and and other car issues on the 350Z, and then find innovative, efficient ways of fixing them. we are trying to attack them in the order of which is most necessary for consistant track performance, which of course filters down to what will last on the street. Brakes are a huge stumbling block on the Z, due to it's weight, so it is mportant to address that. Another is oil cooling, and perhaps water cooling. So we are starting there.
SteveW hit the nail on the head. I think Nissan did a good job of bringing the car to market with the right blend of quality and performance, at a price point that makes it available to a wide audience. If we can get the car to lose some weight, gain some decent power, and keep the refinement level that the car already has, it will be a true winner.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2003 | 07:31 PM
  #11  
DriveI65's Avatar
DriveI65
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Falkville, AL
Default

Nissan 350Z 3196
Car & Driver says the convertible is about 250 lbs. more that! Those canvas tops must weight more than my old MGB top.

I thought the coupe was heavy because the stiffening for the convertible was already in place. Guess not.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jun 19, 2022 06:30 PM
allmycarsdie
Engine & Drivetrain
15
May 13, 2016 04:38 PM
1973camarolt
Drivetrain
5
Oct 11, 2015 01:26 PM
Shane86
Autocross/Road
2
Sep 17, 2015 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 AM.