Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Daniel Heraud is on crack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #1  
ICYBLUE1203's Avatar
ICYBLUE1203
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default Daniel Heraud is on crack

Read Daniel Heraud's Nissan 350Z Review. I've seen it many times, but finally read it. Just read it and see what you think.

http://autos.msn.com/vip/heraudover....=10337&src=vip
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 03:07 PM
  #2  
NeoZ's Avatar
NeoZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA
Default

Apparently, this guy can't even drive an automatic to save his life; 0-60 7.1 seconds; quarter mile 15.3. Is he sure he was driving a Z? This guy seems a little too wound up about the things that make the Z a sports car. I mean, it is a two-seater you should expect it to have a limited amount of cargo space and the interior styling is a subjective matter. Personally, I like it a lot.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 04:06 PM
  #3  
bobbyz's Avatar
bobbyz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Hahahaha.
He says that the Michelin Pilots on the initial test cars provided less grip then the current Bridgestone tires.
Did Bridgestone pay him off or something because the Pilots are known to be WAY better.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #4  
gibbsy1's Avatar
gibbsy1
Charter Member #33
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

I think this is my favorite:

Price/Equipment: The 350Z is quite expensive despite its list of standard equipment. Finish and interior presentation are not as good as those of its German rivals and it is also less powerful than the latter.

Quite expensive? Less powerful than its German rivals? Which German rival is it less powerful than? The German cars he lists as the Z's competition are the TT and the MB CLK-class. I'm pretty sure we have more power than those. And of course those have better finish and interior presentation, they're a hell of a lot more expensive. Not sure why the Z gets a 25% on this one.

Also, why does he only list three trim levels? Are they doing away with base and enthusiast in '04, or is this further proof that he really didn't research this well? I guess his 0-60, 1/4 mile times, and braking distance really tell us what he knows. I mean, that 60-0 braking distance looks more like the 70-0 distance, not the 60-0.

I don't think he'd be happy with my grade on his review.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
350zroadster's Avatar
350zroadster
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,249
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Default

Yeah, that guy missed several obvious points. Things that are matter of fact.

Like many reviews, I don't mind when they are wrong and lower the score of Zs. It means less people buying and more rare.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #6  
lime98's Avatar
lime98
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

i don't get his review:

he lists as a pro
roomy cabin and trunk

and says the cabin room is suprisingly roomy etc, yet gives it a 30% rating? uh.....??


"Performance: In an era where driving fast can prove to be costly, the 350Z accelerates and passes quickly, perhaps too quickly in light of today's traffic conditions. "

did anyone else laugh at this? passes too quickly? LOL
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #7  
imZman's Avatar
imZman
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: NorCaL
Default

Passing to quickly??? Maybe that was his 1/4 mile trouble. The car was shifting to quickly and had to let off the throttle to compensate.
Give me a car that passes to quickly any day. Also, how can a car pass to quickly and be low on performance?

this is all to confusing
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:42 PM
  #8  
silverstoned's Avatar
silverstoned
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town
Default

what an idiot
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 12:31 AM
  #9  
nbdyfcnsqnc's Avatar
nbdyfcnsqnc
350Z-holic
Premier Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,377
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

I like how he says "The Nissan 350Z is a sports coupe with a sales price of less than $50,000." Uh yeah, WAY less, like closer to HALF. Duh.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:04 AM
  #10  
EvEr_34's Avatar
EvEr_34
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default

$50000 Canadian
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 05:12 AM
  #11  
350zSpeedRacer's Avatar
350zSpeedRacer
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

How do these idiots make a living reviewing cars??? I just don't get it!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 06:51 AM
  #12  
350zroadster's Avatar
350zroadster
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,249
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Default

Originally posted by EvEr_34
$50000 Canadian
well, I'm glad that was made clear in the article.

Was he comparing canadian dollar 350Z price to US dollar other cars?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #13  
Btooth's Avatar
Btooth
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

LMAO!!! you guys already beat me to the two things i wanted to comment on....

first of DONT buy a performance car if u dont want it to perform lol (this car is to fast so im gonna deduct points )

and what exactly was he looking at when he said it was too expensive??

last time i checked u couldnt get a good car to perform like this for the price

what a hoot
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #14  
lascala26's Avatar
lascala26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

I read this after I purchased my Z and I re-read it to make sure he was talking about the 350Z. I was like "What the ....?" There are idiots and then there is Mr. Heraud. I would rather be an idiot.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 12:39 PM
  #15  
lascala26's Avatar
lascala26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

Tell him what you think about his review:

E-mail carcomm@microsoft.com

Oh boy!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 01:29 PM
  #16  
failsafe's Avatar
failsafe
....for your health
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 1
From: Raider Nation
Default

Originally posted by lascala26
Tell him what you think about his review:

E-mail carcomm@microsoft.com

Oh boy!
Ah man was looking everywhere for that last night. Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #17  
john0213's Avatar
john0213
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Canada
Default

Just look at the manuel 0-60 time......

6.5!!! what the hell................
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 08:52 PM
  #18  
silverstoned's Avatar
silverstoned
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town
Default

After reading Daniel Heraud's review of the 350 and read his bio.. i was wondering if this was really true....

Daniel Heraud is regarded as one of North America's leading automotive authorities
lol....

An idiot who probably didnt even SIT in the 350 let alone even drive it...YES...The leading automotive authority in North America? After reading his article, i find that very hard to believe..
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 05:15 AM
  #19  
olzilver's Avatar
olzilver
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: SC
Default

Dan is the worst of the three reviewers on MSN Autos. All of his times are faulty. I look at his crap for a laugh. He must test speedgoing up a hill and do brake testing down a hill.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 05:36 AM
  #20  
lascala26's Avatar
lascala26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

Tell him what you think about his review:

E-mail carcomm@microsoft.com

Oh boy!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 PM.