RHP on 350Z?
08-23-2002, 01:07 AM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Noone would have dynoed yet. The cars were just released a few days ago. I wouldn't bother dyno'ing until I hit about 5K miles on the engine. There is a noticeable difference in some vehicles over time.
I looked at corporate development dyno sheets comparing the Z to the Boxster S and S2000 and it does make more rwhp and rwtq throughout the rev range than those cars. It's a little heavier though.
I looked at corporate development dyno sheets comparing the Z to the Boxster S and S2000 and it does make more rwhp and rwtq throughout the rev range than those cars. It's a little heavier though.
08-23-2002, 01:07 AM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: bay area, ca
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sport Compact car dynoed it @ 244 at the wheels which is really good considering a 15% loss in the drivetrain
(287 @crank)*(.85)= 243.95
SSC is MUCH more reliable than MT or any other mag! They lay the facts JUST how they are! Just like they bashed the sentra ser spec v for not having the hp nissan was claiming. They laughed at mitsu for bringing the lancer N/A <non turbo> <------"who are they kidding...."
(287 @crank)*(.85)= 243.95
SSC is MUCH more reliable than MT or any other mag! They lay the facts JUST how they are! Just like they bashed the sentra ser spec v for not having the hp nissan was claiming. They laughed at mitsu for bringing the lancer N/A <non turbo> <------"who are they kidding...."
08-23-2002, 01:16 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe the dyno sheet I saw showed around that same number (mid to high 240s). So, that's probably a pretty safe estimate for the production number.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
01-02-2022 12:58 PM
