Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Take THAT Prius!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:23 PM
  #1  
adamciya350's Avatar
adamciya350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: miami
Default Take THAT Prius!

Just payed $54 to fill up the tank after commuting all week...

decided to drive like a grandpa and see if it worked...






Success!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #2  
mtjenkins's Avatar
mtjenkins
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: LA,CA
Default

I wish i could get 32.6 mpg. You must drive all on the fwy.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:36 PM
  #3  
350z Guy's Avatar
350z Guy
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: Surf City
Default

wow!!! i only get 25 with my car
ahahaha, you probably shift pretty early lol
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:37 PM
  #4  
Valkyrie's Avatar
Valkyrie
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Den of Disapprobation
Default

probably coasted down a hill with the clutch in and took a picture like a little b!tch.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #5  
PDX_Racer's Avatar
PDX_Racer
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 76
From: Nashville, TN
Default

32+ MPG at an average of 36 MPH. Sounds like a lot of 40-55 MPH in 6th gear.

(The best I've ever seen on the flat is 36.8 in 6th gear at 55 MPH).
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #6  
drivessidewayz's Avatar
drivessidewayz
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH
Default

Originally Posted by 350z Guy
wow!!! i only get 25 with my car
ahahaha, you probably shift pretty early lol
This is a common misconception. By shifting early you are not using the car's power band and therefore may be burning more fuel than you need to in order to accelerate to cruising speed.

"Fuel efficiency varies with the vehicle, but generally acceleration is most efficient at 75% to 100% throttle openings.[16] Fuel efficiency during acceleration generally improves as RPM increase until peak torque."

Originally Posted by Valkyrie
probably coasted down a hill with the clutch in and took a picture like a little b!tch.
This is as well. Coasting in neutral or with the clutch in actually burns *more* fuel than coasting and leaving it in any gear.


"When coasting with the engine running and manual transmission in neutral, or clutch depressed, there will still be some fuel consumption due to the engine needing to maintain idle speed. While coasting with the engine running and the transmission in gear, most cars' engine control unit with fuel injection will cut off fuel supply, and the engine will continue running, being driven by the wheels."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_ec...zing_behaviors
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 09:13 PM
  #7  
mtjenkins's Avatar
mtjenkins
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: LA,CA
Default

Originally Posted by drivessidewayz
This is a common misconception. By shifting early you are not using the car's power band and therefore may be burning more fuel than you need to in order to accelerate to cruising speed.

"Fuel efficiency varies with the vehicle, but generally acceleration is most efficient at 75% to 100% throttle openings.[16] Fuel efficiency during acceleration generally improves as RPM increase until peak torque."



This is as well. Coasting in neutral or with the clutch in actually burns *more* fuel than coasting and leaving it in any gear.


"When coasting with the engine running and manual transmission in neutral, or clutch depressed, there will still be some fuel consumption due to the engine needing to maintain idle speed. While coasting with the engine running and the transmission in gear, most cars' engine control unit with fuel injection will cut off fuel supply, and the engine will continue running, being driven by the wheels."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_ec...zing_behaviors
Both of those are interesting points...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
adamciya350's Avatar
adamciya350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: miami
Default

Honestly..I just accelerated slow as hell and didn't pass 3k rpms..no one was on the road lol
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 09:51 PM
  #9  
michaeljr6's Avatar
michaeljr6
New Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,459
Likes: 0
From: small home.
Default

prius gets like 50+mpg
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #10  
drivessidewayz's Avatar
drivessidewayz
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH
Default

Originally Posted by michaeljr6
prius gets like 50+mpg
Yea, but he had a better one ^^

/thread ?

lol

No doubt the Z is a really nice car with decent fuel economy, but nowhere near a Prius.

Last edited by drivessidewayz; Jan 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #11  
kidred350z's Avatar
kidred350z
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Default

never talk crap bout prius my friendh ad to rent 1 when his m3 got wrecked and we said it sucked but his tank went 723 miles before having to be filled..

thats nuts.. mine is like 285 lol miles
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 02:17 AM
  #12  
duro78's Avatar
duro78
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: ny
Default

I wouldnt put too much trust in that gauge either

Last edited by duro78; Jan 16, 2010 at 02:19 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 05:23 AM
  #13  
F34RL355's Avatar
F34RL355
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: london
Default

Originally Posted by Valkyrie
probably coasted down a hill with the clutch in and took a picture like a little b!tch.
^+1
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 05:47 AM
  #14  
SmoothZ's Avatar
SmoothZ
Senior Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 28,899
Likes: 1,906
From: Twin Cities, MN
Default

Originally Posted by adamciya350
decided to drive like a grandpa and see if it worked...
Aren't most people in Miami just a bunch of old farts anyway? When I've been there, traffic was usually bad.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #15  
Valkyrie's Avatar
Valkyrie
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Den of Disapprobation
Default

Originally Posted by drivessidewayz


This is as well. Coasting in neutral or with the clutch in actually burns *more* fuel than coasting and leaving it in any gear.


"When coasting with the engine running and manual transmission in neutral, or clutch depressed, there will still be some fuel consumption due to the engine needing to maintain idle speed. While coasting with the engine running and the transmission in gear, most cars' engine control unit with fuel injection will cut off fuel supply, and the engine will continue running, being driven by the wheels."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_ec...zing_behaviors
So if I'm going down a steep hill. You're saying with it in gear and the engine running at 3k rpm is more fuel efficient than putting the clutch in and coasting down at ~1k rpm?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 06:28 AM
  #16  
Cux350z's Avatar
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (162)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 1,085
From: Greenville, SC
Default

^yes, because the wheels spin the motor. throw an a/f gauge on there and watch it peg to full lean when you coast in gear which means no fuel is being used.

If you really want to see great mpgs on that gauge just swap in some 1000cc injectors and tune a piggyback/standalone.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 06:33 AM
  #17  
PerfZ's Avatar
PerfZ
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 14
From: hilliard ohio
Default

Originally Posted by duro78
I wouldnt put too much trust in that gauge either
You can pretty much trick that gauge into about any number you want over a short period. And at that average speed, you obviously were not traveling in the city. Don't think anyone is gong to get anything close to that on an entire tank, even on the highway, cruise set to 55
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 07:25 AM
  #18  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by adamciya350
Just payed $54 to fill up the tank after commuting all week...

decided to drive like a grandpa and see if it worked...






Success!!!!!!!!!!
did you actually calc it out or only relying on the computer data? I have had my Z long enough to know that computer isn't even close to true MPG
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 08:12 AM
  #19  
adamciya350's Avatar
adamciya350
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: miami
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
did you actually calc it out or only relying on the computer data? I have had my Z long enough to know that computer isn't even close to true MPG
I know...it'd like to believe it is though lol..
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #20  
barclayloftus's Avatar
barclayloftus
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: mountain view, ca
Default

For the last 2-3 months, I was only taking my Z a mile back and forth to the train station (yes i should have walked), and would let her warm up for a good 5 minutes or so before leaving.

Between never getting out of 3rd gear and my heavy foot, I just looked at the MPG computer.

8.2mpg.

Awesome.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 PM.