Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

A couple of new mods for my Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2024, 08:03 AM
  #181  
Dr Hoon
New Member
 
Dr Hoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NoVa
Posts: 530
Received 292 Likes on 232 Posts
Default

I recently installed the Kinetix intake, 75mm TB and CZP adapter in my '06. I can say that this combo does wonders for top end power, the car is pulling hard all the way to the redline now whereas before it was falling on its face around 6k RPM. I feel like the mid range torque might be a bit lower, but I'm still on stock tune so a good dyno tune will likely bring that back. Since my car is purely track duty and spends most of its life in the 5-7k range, the top end gains are much more important to me than low end torque. I've been delaying getting a proper tune until I can install long headers myself, but I'm glad to see the car runs fine with these modification on a stock tune.
The following users liked this post:
Aeneas137 (06-18-2024)
Old 06-18-2024, 07:14 AM
  #182  
bmccann101
350Z-holic
iTrader: (16)
 
bmccann101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scottsdale/coyote drophouse
Posts: 8,242
Received 413 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

id really think twice about running a light weight crank pulley. it does next to nothing for the performance of the engine, yet does VASTLY less for its job of damping the vibration from each cylinder explosion... i will never not run an ATI on anything i build again.. but the factory rubber isolated pulley is still a far better and safer option than a billet aluminum one.

Espeeeecially on a DE engine.. these are notorious for crank walk and have a much weaker crank gircle area than the HR engines do.

Easy thing to swap out, may help your engine longevity by a large degree.
Old 06-18-2024, 07:46 AM
  #183  
ntwillie1
New Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
ntwillie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North East
Posts: 737
Received 44 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmccann101
id really think twice about running a light weight crank pulley. it does next to nothing for the performance of the engine, yet does VASTLY less for its job of damping the vibration from each cylinder explosion... i will never not run an ATI on anything i build again.. but the factory rubber isolated pulley is still a far better and safer option than a billet aluminum one.

Espeeeecially on a DE engine.. these are notorious for crank walk and have a much weaker crank gircle area than the HR engines do.

Easy thing to swap out, may help your engine longevity by a large degree.
i completely agree. They did nothing for me. I was hard headed and went ahead w them anyway and wish i hadn’t.
Old 06-18-2024, 08:52 AM
  #184  
Aeneas137
New Member
 
Aeneas137's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 570
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmccann101
id really think twice about running a light weight crank pulley. it does next to nothing for the performance of the engine, yet does VASTLY less for its job of damping the vibration from each cylinder explosion... i will never not run an ATI on anything i build again.. but the factory rubber isolated pulley is still a far better and safer option than a billet aluminum one.

Espeeeecially on a DE engine.. these are notorious for crank walk and have a much weaker crank gircle area than the HR engines do.

Easy thing to swap out, may help your engine longevity by a large degree.

I think the lightweight dampener is an improvement on heavy engines but not a small/medium VQ V6. I installed one on my 4.6 Mustang back in the day and it helped but I wouldn't bother with it on a VQ. The other engines I'm dealing with today are BMW i6 and Porsche h6, and it's not worth the trouble on those either. intake manifolds seem to be the best bang for your buck. And all of these platforms, that produces good power gains, like Hoon said.. The spacer made a nice improvement so I'm sure that kinetix intake is a good choice for a track car. I wouldn't use it for a street car though. The polymer intake would be a better choice for that I think.
Old 06-19-2024, 09:05 PM
  #185  
DarkZ03
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
DarkZ03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 2,587
Received 492 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aeneas137
I think the lightweight dampener is an improvement on heavy engines but not a small/medium VQ V6. I installed one on my 4.6 Mustang back in the day and it helped but I wouldn't bother with it on a VQ. The other engines I'm dealing with today are BMW i6 and Porsche h6, and it's not worth the trouble on those either. intake manifolds seem to be the best bang for your buck. And all of these platforms, that produces good power gains, like Hoon said.. The spacer made a nice improvement so I'm sure that kinetix intake is a good choice for a track car. I wouldn't use it for a street car though. The polymer intake would be a better choice for that I think.
I have It and I wouldn't use ANYTHING else, the Kinetix is superior to any other setup other than an extensively modified factory plenum.
The only reason to not use it would be if you never rev past 3k and if that's the case, I question why you have a sports car.
Old 06-20-2024, 04:24 AM
  #186  
Aeneas137
New Member
 
Aeneas137's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Yuba City, CA
Posts: 570
Received 133 Likes on 114 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DarkZ03
I have It and I wouldn't use ANYTHING else, the Kinetix is superior to any other setup other than an extensively modified factory plenum.
The only reason to not use it would be if you never rev past 3k and if that's the case, I question why you have a sports car.
oh, well that's good to know. I figured the polymer intake is better for a street car because you're not going to be revving above 5K driving around town or commuting to work. I mean, I get your point about a sports car but you don't drive around at 6K all day long do you?
Old 06-20-2024, 09:20 PM
  #187  
DarkZ03
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
DarkZ03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Des Plaines
Posts: 2,587
Received 492 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aeneas137
oh, well that's good to know. I figured the polymer intake is better for a street car because you're not going to be revving above 5K driving around town or commuting to work. I mean, I get your point about a sports car but you don't drive around at 6K all day long do you?
No I don't, but i dont think there is a day where I drive the the car and don't rev to 7k at least once.
spacers or other manifolds might be better from idle to 4k, but this thing pulls from 4k and up. I'm also notorious for keeping revs above 3500 because I like being in the meaty part of the powerband, so it kinda suits my driving style.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
creedseebas
Engine & Drivetrain
5
05-07-2012 09:49 AM
Classy
Tuning
5
10-27-2010 03:00 AM
Changvi
Engine & Drivetrain
16
04-21-2007 03:01 PM
E K
Intake Exhaust
9
03-02-2007 03:40 PM
04evo2
Engine & Drivetrain
5
07-11-2004 07:28 AM



Quick Reply: A couple of new mods for my Z



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:23 PM.