Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

navigation - best use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #1  
chuck's Avatar
chuck
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: west virginia
Default navigation - best use

When I bought my Blue Z last November I initially planned not to purchase the navigation device. But at the last moment I said "why not" and got it.

I'm glad that I did. I've travelled extensively in the Z and the navigation device was extremely helpful.

But the best use of the navigation device was when driving on curvey mountain roads and stuck behind a slow moving vehicle.

By looking at the navigation map I can tell when the next straight away is coming and pull up close behind the slow vehicle and prepare to pass.

Vooooom



chuck
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #2  
JoneZZZ's Avatar
JoneZZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Chicago/SW Suburbs
Default

I will second that !!!
I used to use "mapquest " or some other tool to plan out trips.....then have to deal with reading my map in the car........no longer....enter the address/or city and GO!!!
I have also noticed that the NAVI seems to monitor traffic congestion......on my last trip to D.C I noticed that I had a series of red arrows at established contruction zones......and then the same thing occurred when I ran up on traffic due to an accident.....anyone else notice this?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
wildone_106's Avatar
wildone_106
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Your talking about the Nav that comes with the Z? I have it to and have never seen "Live" updates to current traffic, and I never seen any options for that feature so tell me how to do it!


" I have also noticed that the NAVI seems to monitor traffic congestion......on my last trip to D.C I noticed that I had a series of red arrows at established contruction zones......and then the same thing occurred when I ran up on traffic due to an accident.....anyone else notice this?"
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #4  
JoneZZZ's Avatar
JoneZZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Chicago/SW Suburbs
Default

It was odd....was running through the PA Tunpike and Maryland (HWY 70?)....they have plenty of contruction restriction zones.....as I went through them I noticed the Arrows..........at the accident site, PA Turnpike Authority had an advisory out on the AM highway channel......this is when I really noticed the arrows on the NAVI......I left thinking that the NAVI was triggered by HWY Authority Advisories...........
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
wildone_106's Avatar
wildone_106
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Can anyone confirm that? I've never ever noticed anything like that on mine, in any kind of traffic, since I got my Z almost 2 years ago. If its true I wanna know how to enable that!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
fisherprice's Avatar
fisherprice
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: S.F.Bay
Default

I have never seen that either and I live in the Bay area
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 09:29 PM
  #7  
dialleft's Avatar
dialleft
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by JoneZZZ
I have also noticed that the NAVI seems to monitor traffic congestion......on my last trip to D.C I noticed that I had a series of red arrows at established contruction zones......and then the same thing occurred when I ran up on traffic due to an accident.....anyone else notice this?
Just checked the nav manual. Nothing there. Maybe you have a new model? When did you get your car? Mine is an 04, though. I know the technology exists because they have it in Germany.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #8  
dialleft's Avatar
dialleft
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

I like to engage the "Shortest distance" and "no highway" features sometimes. From my home in Alameda (near San Francisco) to Dublin in the East Bay it took me over the hills in terrific twisty back roads I didn't know existed. From Koreatown to Hermosa Beach in LA it took me through many different types of residential areas.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #9  
JoneZZZ's Avatar
JoneZZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Chicago/SW Suburbs
Default

dialleft......I have an '04 model.....let me know if you ever notice it......I had my DESTINATION set....in the path of the arrow representing my vehicle were a series of long red arrows(representing congestion?)....
One more item.......ever notice that the "shortest time" between two cities does not take always take you on the same route? I LOVE NAVI!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #10  
dialleft's Avatar
dialleft
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by JoneZZZ
dialleft......I have an '04 model.....let me know if you ever notice it......I had my DESTINATION set....in the path of the arrow representing my vehicle were a series of long red arrows(representing congestion?)....
One more item.......ever notice that the "shortest time" between two cities does not take always take you on the same route? I LOVE NAVI!!!!!
I don't remember ever seeing red arrows, just a blue route. I wonder whether you have some feature turned on to provide additional details of the route. For example, I think you can turn on a feature that gives you turn-by-turn lists like Mapquest. I'll look at the options when I get a chance.

Never saw the different routes for shortest time, not for the exact same two points. My nav on my SUV does weird stuff like that. We went from San Francisco to Oxnard this weekend. The SUV nav said take I5 to LA and then come back up CA101 as the quickest time which it said would be 7 hours and 23 minutes. When I forced it to calculate taking 101 direct it took 40 minutes off the calculated time.

I love the nav, too.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #11  
vermilion's Avatar
vermilion
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Default

The only way the nav system could have information like that would be if it had some sort of wireless receiver capable of picking up updates and someone else to provide them (either local broadcasts a la radio or information relayed from central points via satellite, sort of like a cell phone). That would require special communication hardware in the Z for the nav unit as well as a constant update service provided by some national travel authority like AAA or a well organized government-sponsored system (at least for interstates). That also means some sort of established communication protocol for these systems is needed, so all cars that have different brands of nav systems could receive information from the same broadcast.

While it's a cool idea, that stuff isn't in place for consumers yet, so, no - your Z nav system doesn't have any information about current traffic, construction, or anything else that might have changed that's not on the navigation DVD. I don't know what the arrows you saw were representing, but it isn't t traffic information.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #12  
Montez's Avatar
Montez
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Dallas,Tx Area
Default

Originally posted by vermilion
The only way the nav system could have information like that would be if it had some sort of wireless receiver capable of picking up updates and someone else to provide them (either local broadcasts a la radio or information relayed from central points via satellite, sort of like a cell phone). That would require special communication hardware in the Z for the nav unit as well as a constant update service provided by some national travel authority like AAA or a well organized government-sponsored system (at least for interstates). That also means some sort of established communication protocol for these systems is needed, so all cars that have different brands of nav systems could receive information from the same broadcast.

While it's a cool idea, that stuff isn't in place for consumers yet, so, no - your Z nav system doesn't have any information about current traffic, construction, or anything else that might have changed that's not on the navigation DVD. I don't know what the arrows you saw were representing, but it isn't t traffic information.
I hear Acura is working on something of that nature as we chat here.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #13  
Hazade's Avatar
Hazade
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

I have the red arrows on mine in the blue line. I just always thought it was represneting what way you are supposed to be going down the road (always thought it was pretty obvious anyway). overall I am happy that I got the nav however
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #14  
Aggro_Al's Avatar
Aggro_Al
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by vermilion
The only way the nav system could have information like that would be if it had some sort of wireless receiver capable of picking up updates and someone else to provide them (either local broadcasts a la radio or information relayed from central points via satellite, sort of like a cell phone). That would require special communication hardware in the Z for the nav unit as well as a constant update service provided by some national travel authority like AAA or a well organized government-sponsored system (at least for interstates). That also means some sort of established communication protocol for these systems is needed, so all cars that have different brands of nav systems could receive information from the same broadcast.

While it's a cool idea, that stuff isn't in place for consumers yet, so, no - your Z nav system doesn't have any information about current traffic, construction, or anything else that might have changed that's not on the navigation DVD. I don't know what the arrows you saw were representing, but it isn't t traffic information.
It is available at the consumer level. I had an aftermarket multi-navigation/GPS system (Magellan 750M Plus mobile GPS/Navigation w/car kit) on my previous car. It had the capability to route around traffic, construction and accidents. It also had the capability to access real-time info (i.e. weather) via satellite for a fee or track people or vehicles if the system was in mobile mode and the antennae was active. "On-Star" also has real-time services by subscription. It would be great if the system in the Z could do the same thing. If it does, can someone give us instructions on how to activate it.

Last edited by Aggro_Al; Sep 21, 2004 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #15  
JoneZZZ's Avatar
JoneZZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Chicago/SW Suburbs
Default

Just an update regarding the "possible live traffic updates".....I spent some time in the Users Manual for the Navigation system....NO REFERENCE TO LIVE UPDATES.......I called the help line referenced in the book.....They cannot explain what I described(but are investigating)......

Still happy with both my "Z" and the NAVI.....

JoneZZZ
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #16  
AzianToby's Avatar
AzianToby
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Default

damn... now I kinda wish I got the Navi package with my Z.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #17  
Penderwheels's Avatar
Penderwheels
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Dutton, MI / Naples, Fl
Default

I believe the red arrows are one way streets. That would include the "one way" or right set of lanes in an interstate or other divided highway.

Before the "Z", I had a motorhome and used a laptop with Street Atlas USA softwarre by DeLorme and a GPS interface. It worked similar to the Z navi except that it lagged the actual by several seconds and would thus sometimes announce the "next turn" some 500 feet after I had passed - a royal pain. (The Z has inertia sensors that make it much more "real time) But.......getting to the point..... The Street Atlas had a (telephone) dial-up option where I could submit a proposed route and get detour info. (I never tested it by interfacing the laptop to our cell phone to see if I could get a "live" update)

Wireless updates do not yet exist.

Last edited by Penderwheels; Oct 7, 2004 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #18  
Tubbs SF's Avatar
Tubbs SF
Charter Member #85
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

The nav is definitely a feature worth getting in the Z. Not only does it provide the practicality and security of knowing 95% of the time you wont get lost, but it adds to the cool factor of the car (like it needed more) due to the color at night and the unique Nissan 2/3 view.

Tubbs SF
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TrboMike
North East
1
Sep 28, 2015 06:36 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM
lauderdale75
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
7
Dec 31, 2002 09:53 AM
Perf350Zfan
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
2
Nov 18, 2002 07:51 AM
Toby
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
0
Oct 14, 2002 12:25 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 PM.