According to motortrend 0-60 is 4.7
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: .
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it just me or did some people have ridiculously high standards for the new Z? This is pretty much exactly where I was expecting the 370 to be at. I'm loving the trap of nearly 106mph! I could barely squeeze out a 100.xx in my 04 and my 06 revup trapped a tad lower. Both were close to 14 sec cars. The HR I drove ran 13.6 at 102.xx. This 370Z is definitely step up..no complaints here
I honestly believe the 7 AT will be even quicker than the manual...if not the same.
I honestly believe the 7 AT will be even quicker than the manual...if not the same.
Anyone who used logic rather than fantacizing should have expected these results, which are more than fine. You get better handling, faster acceleration, more gadgets, for almost the same price. Why are people whining?
#22
New Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Posts: 22,910
Received 2,446 Likes
on
1,768 Posts
I guarantee that the numbers will improve. I put money on the 370 running 12's and trapping 108-110. Remember, mag times NEVER compare to what we run at the track.
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Motor Trend is the Super Street of mainstream automotive magazines. I.e., by retards, for retards. I wouldn't trust anything they print.
Not saying the new Z won't run those times, but I'll wait until a more reliable source prints its results.
Not saying the new Z won't run those times, but I'll wait until a more reliable source prints its results.
Last edited by Sea Bass; 11-25-2008 at 08:01 PM.
#25
The only thing to possibly whine about is that Nissan hinted at 200+ pound lighter weight, and it didn't materialize.
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think nissan officially said anything. It was hinted to a marketing group that the 370z would weigh 200 lbs less. Nissan did reduce the weight by about 200 lbs but because of the added features the 370z ends up weighing about 100 lbs less than a 08 z.
#27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it just me or did some people have ridiculously high standards for the new Z? This is pretty much exactly where I was expecting the 370 to be at. I'm loving the trap of nearly 106mph! I could barely squeeze out a 100.xx in my 04 and my 06 revup trapped a tad lower. Both were close to 14 sec cars. The HR I drove ran 13.6 at 102.xx. This 370Z is definitely step up..no complaints here
I honestly believe the 7 AT will be even quicker than the manual...if not the same.
I honestly believe the 7 AT will be even quicker than the manual...if not the same.
I always knew at the end the 370z would be a lighter g37. I expected around 13.3 1/4 mile from reviewers. I was hoping for more but i'm not disappointed.
#28
Granted, they did a great job... lopping off 225 pounds from the 350Z chassis... but safety measures, interior improvements and a 42 pound heavier VQ37 put a lot of it back.
I understand WHY they failed to deliver... in fact I always said I couldn't see how it would be 200 pounds lighter, when almost everyone else was championing those 3000-3100 pound curb weights and mid-12 quarter mile runs... you know who you are.
Last edited by trebien; 11-25-2008 at 08:56 PM.
#29
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In a world where >3500lb sports cars are becoming the norm... the Z to be a lightweight. And with all the major upgrades I consider this a remarkable achievement even if it does weigh the same as a Nismo 350.
I wish we could have reviews of the base model to see if the sport package is worth the extra dough. I'd rather have the 18's as snow tires since I'll more than likely be upgrading my rims to begin with. Brakes should be sufficient as well since I'll never track the vehicle. VLSD would be nice but not necessary.
I wish we could have reviews of the base model to see if the sport package is worth the extra dough. I'd rather have the 18's as snow tires since I'll more than likely be upgrading my rims to begin with. Brakes should be sufficient as well since I'll never track the vehicle. VLSD would be nice but not necessary.
#31
Since you mentioned snow wheels, the VLSD might actually be nice to have.
#32
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Coast/Pacific Rim
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 4.7 0-60 isn't surprising at all. I knew this was realistic comparing to the 5.0 g37 sedan 0-60. How did they only manage to get a 13.3 1/4? I have a feeling that the 7AT will do better than this.
Last edited by black06z; 11-25-2008 at 10:41 PM.
#33
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remember mags were getting 14's from the Z with a few hitting 13's when it first came out...Owners were getting better times at dedicated 1/4 tracks out of there 350z's..So dont worry. the 13.3 is actually promising if you think about it...Owners and maybe a few mags will get at the very least a 13 flat imho as more testing is done.
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sonoma, CA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's what I'm talking about! This article plus the edmunds sexy video and pics made me poop all over myself.
Oh goodness, Nissan Delivered baby!
This is the least amount of money I've spent on sex...
Oh goodness, Nissan Delivered baby!
This is the least amount of money I've spent on sex...
#35
Also I forgot my account name for my account here that I used from 2003-2007 and just as I'm finishing writing this post I remembered what it was, lol. Getting old...
#36
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really, actually. As someone who's followed the news of this car since it was first rumored and then announced, the 200lb weight improvement has been probably THE number one expected change. It seems in fact it is more that the fanboys are starting to pull into a defensive circle around the 370Z because it is clearly NOT living up to that weight improvement and in fact is slightly HEAVIER than the 350Z, making it MORE THAN 200lbs off from the anticipated/projected weight savings and thus worthy of some ribbing.
Also I forgot my account name for my account here that I used from 2003-2007 and just as I'm finishing writing this post I remembered what it was, lol. Getting old...
Also I forgot my account name for my account here that I used from 2003-2007 and just as I'm finishing writing this post I remembered what it was, lol. Getting old...
And its funny that a lot of you were fantasizing that it would weigh around 3100 lbs and have around 350HP. First off Nissan never really makes light-weight cars weight is a Mazda thing. Just look at the GTR, so to think the new Z was going to come in at 3100lbs was dreaming, Nissan isn't known for lightweight. And as the generations go on or a new model comes up the car usually grows about 200-300lbs. So for Nissan to actually think about weight a little bit this time around and keep it about the same as the current car is an achievement.
For those hoping for 350HP was another dream. Nissan always come out rather soft on the power end of things in the first couple years. While I think they do put more focus on the motor (power/tq) end of things they always seem to put it just around the competition instead of giving a bit more so the competition has to catch up. My thinking is though 2-3 years in both the Z/G will get a healthy dose of a power upgrade. Cause I expect possibly BMW to turn up the wick on the 335 since the Z is now treading on its toes.
#38
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I meant in the first year or two of production. Especially at introduction of the 370, it would definitely not get 350. I do think 350-370 will come in a few years when they do a face lift etc.
Where's a link to this VQ38? Any google search just brings up speculation of what motor the GTR was getting before it was released. It ended up being a VR not a VQ.
Where's a link to this VQ38? Any google search just brings up speculation of what motor the GTR was getting before it was released. It ended up being a VR not a VQ.
Last edited by 4DRSpeed; 11-26-2008 at 05:19 AM.
#40
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mohegan Lake, NY
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the car chassis itself weighs 200lbs less.
all the new regulations and saftey equipment and goodies and bracing and the big 19's and the big rotors and the bigger displacement engine add alot of weight back.
like i said in a couple of other threads, get some two piece rotors all the way around,
get some lightweight 19's or 18's if you want to save a few more lbs all around. although i doubt your going to find 19's even 2 lbs lighter than stock. an aftermarket exhaust will take out at least 30lbs if you replace the entire thing, bucket seats will take off at least 30lbs each, lightweight battery will take out at least 25lbs, taking out the spare and sub will shave off 45lbs +.
you can get your weight savings back it's just gonna cost you .
and btw i just watched the edmunds video and it sounds SICK. i can just imagine the sound with headers, Test pipes and a Apexi N1 behind it.
all the new regulations and saftey equipment and goodies and bracing and the big 19's and the big rotors and the bigger displacement engine add alot of weight back.
like i said in a couple of other threads, get some two piece rotors all the way around,
get some lightweight 19's or 18's if you want to save a few more lbs all around. although i doubt your going to find 19's even 2 lbs lighter than stock. an aftermarket exhaust will take out at least 30lbs if you replace the entire thing, bucket seats will take off at least 30lbs each, lightweight battery will take out at least 25lbs, taking out the spare and sub will shave off 45lbs +.
you can get your weight savings back it's just gonna cost you .
and btw i just watched the edmunds video and it sounds SICK. i can just imagine the sound with headers, Test pipes and a Apexi N1 behind it.
Last edited by supergoji; 11-26-2008 at 06:17 AM.