According to motortrend 0-60 is 4.7

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:13 PM

PL8MYRIDE

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 14

Likes: 0

From: Australia

According to motortrend 0-60 is 4.7

Check this out...
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:19 PM

Liquid

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 53

Likes: 0

From: Columbus, OH

Cool! If you love blue, this is the article to read!

EDIT: Holy crap 0.99g skidpad!

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:23 PM

kham25

New Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 1,978

Likes: 16

From: NY/NJ

Wait an 07 HR was rated at 4.9 seconds how the hell

Beating the fock out of each gear to get that

As for the 370 nice!!!!!!!!

Last edited by kham25; Nov 25, 2008 at 04:26 PM.

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:27 PM

A.H

Registered User

iTrader: (20)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 1,699

Likes: 0

From: SoCal 818

I think the HR was rated at 5.2-5.4

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:28 PM

SnakeBitten

Registered User

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 1,505

Likes: 0

From: NY

Nice read...A far cry from my unrealistic 108-109mph in the 1/4 lol....Better number than Edmunds save for the braking...Thanks for the link....Its looking better the more I see it...

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:29 PM

kham25

New Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 1,978

Likes: 16

From: NY/NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by A.H

I think the HR was rated at 5.2-5.4

I guess they must be rapeing these cars to get these times then

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:31 PM

Endgame

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 526

Likes: 0

From: Phoenix

SEEEEE. I knew it would be closer to this!!!

Trending Topics

Asked but not answered. Speedo calibration.

3

235
Clutch disengagement issue need help!

7

418
2007 convertible won't close all the way down

11

757
Car Computer!!

11

857
2026 SCCA Road Racing Campaign

28

1.6k

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:32 PM

highflyinkilla

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 195

Likes: 0

From: covington, la

Quote:

Originally Posted by A.H

I think the HR was rated at 5.2-5.4

4.9

Quote:

the Z rips to 60 in just 4.7 ticks on its way to a quarter-mile run of 13.3 at 105.7. While not an equal to the DBS, the 370Z is speedier than the racebred 306-horse. 3.5-liter Nismo 350Z we tested in 2007, which ran 4.9 and 13.5 at 103.9

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:35 PM

Mystiqueskillz

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 3

Likes: 0

From: Newark, CA

I was hoping for a higher trap speed, but I think when people get there hands on the car, they will produce better times!

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:42 PM

#10

Ilike350Z

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 623

Likes: 0

From: VA

nice, manual tranny runs 0-60 in 4.7, i would guess auto in 4.9 or same 4.7?

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:45 PM

#11

skaterbasist

Registered User

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 2,071

Likes: 0

From: .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ilike350Z

nice, manual tranny runs 0-60 in 4.7, i would guess auto in 4.9 or same 4.7?

The 7AT's gearing is very aggressive in the first two gears. So I would assume it would do just as good as the 6MT.

Not that I care of 0-60's, but the G37 Sedan 7AT pulled it off in 5.0 with 245 tires (as opposed to the 370Z's 275's).

Nov 25, 2008 | 04:56 PM

#12

Ilike350Z

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 623

Likes: 0

From: VA

comparison 350Z and 370Z according to MT magazine, not much difference
Length x width x height
167.21 x 72.86 x 51.98 in (370Z)
169.4 x 71.5 x 52.3 in (350Z)

Nov 25, 2008 | 05:02 PM

#13

Motormouth

Banned

iTrader: (44)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 20,190

Likes: 2

From: not here

wheelbase

Nov 25, 2008 | 05:13 PM

#14

f-infiniti

Registered User

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

From: Chicago

Another article for comparisons sake.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*

Nov 25, 2008 | 05:39 PM

#15

highflyinkilla

Registered User

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 195

Likes: 0

From: covington, la

Quote:

The net weight reduction, according to Nissan, is around 88 pounds, depending on trim, although our scales indicate the 370Z with the optional Sport Package (viscous limited-slip differential, 19-inch forged Rays wheels, Bridgestone tires, Akebono brakes, SynchroRev Match, front and rear spoilers, 0.29 Cd) weighs 12 pounds more than the Nismo 350Z.

So in reality heavier than the 350 after all this hype about it being lighter.

Last edited by highflyinkilla; Nov 25, 2008 at 06:00 PM.

Nov 25, 2008 | 05:45 PM

#16

turismo

Registered User

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 8,448

Likes: 0

From: curl lookin boy

Man, I thought this car was gonna be 3100lbs and run high 12's at 107-108. Im very disappointed.

Nov 25, 2008 | 06:04 PM

#17

bboypuertoroc

New Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 22,917

Likes: 2,451

From: Get out my way pimpin, VA

Nobody should be taking the numbers as gospel yet.

Nov 25, 2008 | 06:59 PM

#18

michaelm5

Registered User

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 121

Likes: 0

From: Sammamish, Washington

I have an 07 HR and it was rated at 5.2

Nov 25, 2008 | 07:27 PM

#19

JCSVT

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 624

Likes: 0

From: USA

That's OK I guess. I thought it was going to be able to beat a stock C5 in a straight line but I guess not.

Nov 25, 2008 | 07:39 PM

#20

zman1910

Registered User

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 1,895

Likes: 0

From: NY

Is it just me or did some people have ridiculously high standards for the new Z? This is pretty much exactly where I was expecting the 370 to be at. I'm loving the trap of nearly 106mph! I could barely squeeze out a 100.xx in my 04 and my 06 revup trapped a tad lower. Both were close to 14 sec cars. The HR I drove ran 13.6 at 102.xx. This 370Z is definitely step up..no complaints here

I honestly believe the 7 AT will be even quicker than the manual...if not the same.

Last edited by zman1910; Nov 25, 2008 at 07:41 PM.

Reply Share

First
Prev
1 / 5
Next
Last

Forum Jump