Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

350zhr vs 370z acceleration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #21  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by fabcas311
370z>350z hr period
The 370Z is a HR as well. I call it a Vtec HR.

The 370z overall is a better car obviously. But it isn't a huge change that it's worth upgrading. At least not for 07+ owners.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #22  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
My NISMO weighed at the track 3324lb. The 370z weighed by C&D base model 3350.
so you and C&D both used the same exact scale... delusional boy
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Here we go again with you.

C&D weighed an actual base model car to see if Nissan was telling the truth or not, and they were not. It actually weighed 3350. That is heavy!

FWIW the C&D article I read was a base with the Sports Package, and weighed in at 3360. I haven't seen anyone weight a straight base model yet

We should get some owners of stock cars together from each gen, same amt of gallons in the tank, same scale, and weigh 'em for comparison sake
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #24  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
so you and C&D both used the same exact scale... delusional boy
Scales are usually not wrong as they are calibrated all the time. More excuses from you.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #25  
fabcas311's Avatar
fabcas311
Registered User
iTrader: (86)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Mcallen,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
The 370Z is a HR as well. I call it a Vtec HR.

The 370z overall is a better car obviously. But it isn't a huge change that it's worth upgrading. At least not for 07+ owners.
edit:07-08 nismo owners
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #26  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
FWIW the C&D article I read was a base with the Sports Package, and weighed in at 3360. I haven't seen anyone weight a straight base model yet

We should get some owners of stock cars together from each gen, same amt of gallons in the tank, same scale, and weigh 'em for comparison sake
I agree with getting owners to take their cars to get them weighed. Either way a base model with sport package. Add the touring and that pushes it to probably 3450~.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #27  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

maybe, maybe not...we don't know what amount of fuel was in the tank, for example

really the only way to know is a sampling of bone stock cars, down to the tires, same amount of fuel (in gallons), and the same scale.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #28  
Carbon-Z's Avatar
Carbon-Z
Sleeps in 350Z
Premier Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
so you and C&D both used the same exact scale... delusional boy
You seriously need to STFU. Sick and tired of your HR bashing. We are all Z owners here so get a life.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #29  
Chromex319's Avatar
Chromex319
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, California
Default

The hostility
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #30  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Carbon-Z
You seriously need to STFU. Sick and tired of your HR bashing. We are all Z owners here so get a life.
HR bashing? when have i bashed the HR? I bashed the HR owners who think for some stupid reason, thats its god's gift to earth and even if a better performing version of the engine comes out, the HR for some strange reason is a superior motor. find one post of me bashing the HR motor. YOU WONT FIND ONE. ive always praised the engine itself. Its a great motor, superior to my DE. but how can you sit around while idiots like solo spout why their HR is superior to the 3.7L counterpart? it doesnt make any sense. you sir need to better reading comprehension. yes we are all Z owners so i guess no matter how much false information members put out there, we should just ignore it since "we are all Z owners"
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #31  
Carbon-Z's Avatar
Carbon-Z
Sleeps in 350Z
Premier Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
HR bashing? when have i bashed the HR? I bashed the HR owners who think for some stupid reason, thats its god's gift to earth and even if a better performing version of the engine comes out, the HR for some strange reason is a superior motor. find one post of me bashing the HR motor. YOU WONT FIND ONE. ive always praised the engine itself. Its a great motor, superior to my DE. but how can you sit around while idiots like solo spout why their HR is superior to the 3.7L counterpart? it doesnt make any sense. you sir need to better reading comprehension. yes we are all Z owners so i guess no matter how much false information members put out there, we should just ignore it since "we are all Z owners"
That is in your head. You don't seem to like HR owners. You are the only one with a problem with them. You seriously need to grow up.

It's not you bashing the HR. It's you acting like a child and bashing the owners of the HR. Solo has never said it was superior. You are making it look like that.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
get your crap straight VQ35HR nutthuggers and make sure you fellas are on the same fkn page cause your excuses are getting more and more lame the further you bs about this crap. snap out of your dreams and realize that the 370z is a better car.
fixed, people use the word "superior" too loosely around here, Ferrari's and lamborghini's are superior cars.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #33  
Hraesvelg's Avatar
Hraesvelg
Got Uranium?
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 35,723
Likes: 6
From: The Recliner of Rage
Default

Originally Posted by fabcas311
edit:07-08 nismo owners
Werd... unless they come out with a Nismo 370
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 05:00 PM
  #34  
NISMO_558's Avatar
NISMO_558
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,003
Likes: 4
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
Werd... unless they come out with a Nismo 370
word on the street is their canceling the nismo program for Z's, but a nismo 370z would be sweet.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #35  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Carbon-Z
That is in your head. You don't seem to like HR owners. You are the only one with a problem with them. You seriously need to grow up.

It's not you bashing the HR. It's you acting like a child and bashing the owners of the HR. Solo has never said it was superior. You are making it look like that.
no sir, if a DE owner says the DE is superior because it produces more torque than any of the VQ motors, i would call him out too and i have because that was what DE owners were hanging on to when the Revup came out. solo has claimed that the HR was just as fast if not faster than a 3.7L.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 06:22 PM
  #36  
Carbon-Z's Avatar
Carbon-Z
Sleeps in 350Z
Premier Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West
Default

The 370z hasn't proven to be faster yet. So why you keep saying it is? I don't see him being wrong. I see you being arrogant.
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #37  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

No one ever said the HR-Z is superior, or that the 35HR is superior to a 37HR. Nexx, you're pretty f*ckin daft, buddy. That and uninformed.
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:08 AM
  #38  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
No one ever said the HR-Z is superior, or that the 35HR is superior to a 37HR. Nexx, you're pretty f*ckin daft, buddy. That and uninformed.
orly? i guess i must present my case Arnold Tool.

here is the glorious solo350z in denial

"Last I checked the 3.7L hasn't ran any faster times than the HR 350z.

And the 370Z does weigh more not less."

yes it has, C&D ran the HR at 13.7 @ 104mph while the 370 ran a 13.5 @ 106

how can a car with getter gearing, around the same weight or less and with more horsepower not be faster? its just dumb not to realize this.

next case. solo posts this in a thread where sharif posted gains on a 370z with exhaust and hfc's. Sharif, who has based lined many HR's stated that the HR's normally dyno 235whp stock on his dyno while VQ37HR dyno 250 to 255whp. read as follows.

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
"I like facts, and the fact is the 370z is NOT faster than the 350z HR.

Fact is the 370z makes only 10 more rwhp than the 350z HR."


next case: solo for some reason thinks that the 370 is a pig and weighs more than a 350z. the sports packaged 370z weighed in at that not the base model. dont try to fluff up the 370z's weight.

When has a 350z weighed more than 3350 lb? Please tell me. That is the base weight of the 370z.

The base model has been weight in at around 3250, ive even seen some listed slightly under that from their tests. google it, its not hard to find.

next case, where he embellishes the HR's performance:

"The HRs ran mid 13s in the mags."

NO IT DID NOT, Both Car and Driver and Road and Track ran 13.7's in the HR.
Motortrend had the HR at 13.5 103.9 vs 13.3 @ 105.7 for the 370. so one out of the three major mags actually managed to his mid 13.5's but thats like me saying the 370 ran low 13 mag times even though 13.5 seems like more of the norm.

if you want to read more of his foolery go here. he jumps into a cayman vs 370 thread and just bashes and down plays the 370's good showing vs the cayman. im not the only one who questions this guys posts. https://my350z.com/forum/2009-370z/4...ml#post7018925

according to solo: Nismo 350z > Errrthang.

oh solo your car weaksauce man, 276whp with breathing mods and a tune on a dynojet? 291whp on the heartbreaker dyno dynamics with exhaust and hfc's would eat your car alive. https://my350z.com/forum/vq35hr/4032...ml#post7006845

another example of the 350z HR > Errthang from solo

"Yep load of crap if it was a E46. If it was a new one then I still doubt it. Tell them to watch out the 07+ HR 350z because they are just as fast as their precious e46 M3."



are you fkn kidding me?? lol, d00d since you're so hung up on magazine times. about a Car and Driver quarter mile from a E46 M3, 13.1 @ 107mph bone stock.

ok im done. for the record, i have never bashed the HR motor itself, just solo who makes zero sense, contradicts himself and for some stupid goes out of his way to down, bash and hate on the 370 for whatever reason. my responses to him were for his ridiculous claims and to hate on the HR motor or its owners. ok, i did hate on the people who agreed with his non sense posts.
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 04:45 AM
  #39  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

The HR 350z has ran a 13.5 as well by one magazine. So that is not any slower or faster than a 370z. All the track times here show the 370z to be slower than the HR so far till people take it to the track. So yes the 370z hasn't shown to be any faster yet.

A vendor even said it weighed 3360 with base model sport package 370z. That is HEAVY. That is heavier than the 350z in most models. So again you are mouthing off because you are uninformed again.

15rwhp vs 10rwhp. I was close. Some show 10 some show 25 rwhp gains between cars. Depends on the dyno, setup, conditions, etc.

Laugh, who actually weighed a complete base model? I can promise you the Sport package does not add 100+ lb to the car. Maybe 25lb or so.

So how can you deny the 13.5 from the NISMO 350Z that one of the mags ran? Or all the drag times on this site from stock HR 350zs? Wow you are a douchebag.

A full exhaust will put me in the 290s easily. This has been proven by other owners. All I have are HFCs and stock exhaust. Again you are trying to mouth off.

A friend of mine has a E46 M3 and we have ran several times. We are pretty much dead even like many others in that thread have also experienced. Again you have no experience in this area as usual and are hating the HR.

Originally Posted by Nexx
orly? i guess i must present my case Arnold Tool.

here is the glorious solo350z in denial

"Last I checked the 3.7L hasn't ran any faster times than the HR 350z.

And the 370Z does weigh more not less."

yes it has, C&D ran the HR at 13.7 @ 104mph while the 370 ran a 13.5 @ 106

how can a car with getter gearing, around the same weight or less and with more horsepower not be faster? its just dumb not to realize this.

next case. solo posts this in a thread where sharif posted gains on a 370z with exhaust and hfc's. Sharif, who has based lined many HR's stated that the HR's normally dyno 235whp stock on his dyno while VQ37HR dyno 250 to 255whp. read as follows.

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
"I like facts, and the fact is the 370z is NOT faster than the 350z HR.

Fact is the 370z makes only 10 more rwhp than the 350z HR."


next case: solo for some reason thinks that the 370 is a pig and weighs more than a 350z. the sports packaged 370z weighed in at that not the base model. dont try to fluff up the 370z's weight.

When has a 350z weighed more than 3350 lb? Please tell me. That is the base weight of the 370z.

The base model has been weight in at around 3250, ive even seen some listed slightly under that from their tests. google it, its not hard to find.

next case, where he embellishes the HR's performance:

"The HRs ran mid 13s in the mags."

NO IT DID NOT, Both Car and Driver and Road and Track ran 13.7's in the HR.
Motortrend had the HR at 13.5 103.9 vs 13.3 @ 105.7 for the 370. so one out of the three major mags actually managed to his mid 13.5's but thats like me saying the 370 ran low 13 mag times even though 13.5 seems like more of the norm.

if you want to read more of his foolery go here. he jumps into a cayman vs 370 thread and just bashes and down plays the 370's good showing vs the cayman. im not the only one who questions this guys posts. https://my350z.com/forum/2009-370z/4...ml#post7018925

according to solo: Nismo 350z > Errrthang.

oh solo your car weaksauce man, 276whp with breathing mods and a tune on a dynojet? 291whp on the heartbreaker dyno dynamics with exhaust and hfc's would eat your car alive. https://my350z.com/forum/vq35hr/4032...ml#post7006845

another example of the 350z HR > Errthang from solo

"Yep load of crap if it was a E46. If it was a new one then I still doubt it. Tell them to watch out the 07+ HR 350z because they are just as fast as their precious e46 M3."



are you fkn kidding me?? lol, d00d since you're so hung up on magazine times. about a Car and Driver quarter mile from a E46 M3, 13.1 @ 107mph bone stock.

ok im done. for the record, i have never bashed the HR motor itself, just solo who makes zero sense, contradicts himself and for some stupid goes out of his way to down, bash and hate on the 370 for whatever reason. my responses to him were for his ridiculous claims and to hate on the HR motor or its owners. ok, i did hate on the people who agreed with his non sense posts.
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 04:46 AM
  #40  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by Concave
nexx and solo...... bitter bitter kids.
one says nismo > all, other says me > all. who to side with..
Never said that. But Nexx has a issue with the HR it seems. And wants to deny all the facts that I laid out and others. Then he calls people HR nuthuggars when he doesn't agree. He is a tool.

Anyone can review Nexx history on this site how he attacks other members on the HR or just makes fun of the HR period in posts not talking about it. It's actually kinda funny.

Last edited by SOLO-350Z; Mar 30, 2009 at 04:48 AM.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.