Notices
2009+ Nissan GT-R Nissan R35 GT-R Discussion

M3 beats GT-R and Porsche turbo in C&D comparison test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2008, 04:48 AM
  #61  
HyperKnight
Stulax makes me cream
iTrader: (1)
 
HyperKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 16,401
Received 631 Likes on 440 Posts
Default

I don't understand why people get so bent outta shape of mag comparisons. Shouldn't it only matter what you think about a car? I know people are going to blast me for this, but I've never been a big fan of Porsche and/or BMW.
Old 05-29-2008, 04:58 AM
  #62  
LeMans 05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
LeMans 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
LMAO!

Violin plays in background for GTR nuthuggers...

BTW-even funnier is the 12.1 @ 115mph 1/4 time. I believe most preproduction crazy #'s were obviously massaged to impress. I have yet to see a production GTR trap over 120mph.
I read the article. They said a 3rd GT-R they've tested matched their previous 11.6 @ 124 time. This example they got from Nissan for this comparison was a 'press car' with over 3500 miles on it, and the drivetrain they said seemed like it spent pretty much all of those miles being launched repeatedly. This car wasn't at full strength. And it still beat the M3 and Turbo around the track.
Old 05-29-2008, 05:05 AM
  #63  
DelayedZ
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
DelayedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LBI, NJ
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by blasian
I'd take an M5

BTW, a friend of mine wasn't too high on it until he saw it in person at Zdayz. I mean I liked it but seeing it in person is way different. I sure as hell wasn't the G37s much until I saw them in person.
Saw an M5 yesterday on the island I live on, all black, guy had to be 95 years old I was so sad, but he revved at me, and got on it a lil it was pretty cool, lol.
Old 05-29-2008, 05:20 AM
  #64  
robbycolli
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
robbycolli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motormouth

I wonder what cruising speeds are in those cars @ 60mph.
After doing the research, it turns out that all three cars cruising speeds are 60mph @ 60mph. So they are equal by that comparison.
Old 05-29-2008, 07:10 AM
  #65  
myG35zx
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
myG35zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robbycolli
After doing the research, it turns out that all three cars cruising speeds are 60mph @ 60mph. So they are equal by that comparison.


Old 05-29-2008, 07:16 AM
  #66  
blasian
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
blasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by myG35zx
I'm sure the M3s cruise control is better.
Old 05-29-2008, 07:21 AM
  #67  
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
SniperHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeMans 05
I read the article. They said a 3rd GT-R they've tested matched their previous 11.6 @ 124 time. This example they got from Nissan for this comparison was a 'press car' with over 3500 miles on it, and the drivetrain they said seemed like it spent pretty much all of those miles being launched repeatedly. This car wasn't at full strength. And it still beat the M3 and Turbo around the track.
I can see the commercials now: "The all new Nissan GT-R. Even when bruised and battered, it'll still sh*t on your Porsche or BMW."
Old 05-29-2008, 08:46 AM
  #68  
faris13
Registered User
 
faris13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really thought about the buying the GTR but couldn't get past the looks and the fact it will be pretty much impossible to find one anywhere near it's $70K MSRP.
Old 05-29-2008, 09:44 AM
  #69  
my05350z
Registered User
 
my05350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south florida
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I may be wrong but i think a Porsche costs more because of all the customization one can do like different colors for different sections of the interior, etc.

I would get any of them if i had the money. If i was really roiling in the dough like in my dream last night, it would be a gt2 and a gt-r in the driveway.

As for the magazine bias, who cares. If i listened to the magazines i probably wouldn't have bought a Z
Old 05-29-2008, 02:04 PM
  #70  
VelocityC6
Registered User
 
VelocityC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This should be a warning to all prospective GTR buyers thinking it's the ultimate supercar, with only 3500 miles the car already was developing problems. Enjoy launch control cause it seems it only has xx amount of launches in it.........then have fun trying to get this super expensive trans convered under warranty.

Oh and C&D comparisons turn to **** when BMW is involved.......I don't think a Bimmer ever loses a comparison.
Old 05-29-2008, 02:06 PM
  #71  
VelocityC6
Registered User
 
VelocityC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by areddy
Actually it should be GT-R, Turbo, M3. The GT-R is by far a better performing car than the 911 Turbo.
It's not only about the raw numbers, which you constantly fail to take into account. I would take a 911 TT over a GTR/M3/Z06 anyday.
Old 05-29-2008, 04:04 PM
  #72  
gatti-man
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
gatti-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: austin tx
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VelocityC6
It's not only about the raw numbers, which you constantly fail to take into account. I would take a 911 TT over a GTR/M3/Z06 anyday.
well its not all about posing either.
Old 05-29-2008, 04:11 PM
  #73  
areddy
Registered User
 
areddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gatti-man
well its not all about posing either.
+1. Something the 997 TT fans fail to realize. The GT-R is the best of both worlds. It's angular and sharp lines give it a far more aggressive look than a 911 and it has the performance to back it all up.
Old 05-29-2008, 04:35 PM
  #74  
blasian
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
blasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VelocityC6
This should be a warning to all prospective GTR buyers thinking it's the ultimate supercar, with only 3500 miles the car already was developing problems. Enjoy launch control cause it seems it only has xx amount of launches in it.........then have fun trying to get this super expensive trans convered under warranty.

Oh and C&D comparisons turn to **** when BMW is involved.......I don't think a Bimmer ever loses a comparison.
Jeez, someone forgot the KY it seems.
Old 05-29-2008, 04:35 PM
  #75  
blasian
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
blasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gatti-man
well its not all about posing either.
It's about leg room.
Old 05-29-2008, 06:47 PM
  #76  
03Tour6Spd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
03Tour6Spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VelocityC6
This should be a warning to all prospective GTR buyers thinking it's the ultimate supercar, with only 3500 miles the car already was developing problems. Enjoy launch control cause it seems it only has xx amount of launches in it.........then have fun trying to get this super expensive trans convered under warranty.

Oh and C&D comparisons turn to **** when BMW is involved.......I don't think a Bimmer ever loses a comparison.

G35 killed the like 13 year streak of the 3 series for that class...

as for the GT-R looks we all know they designed it from hours of wind tunnel tests which is fine with me, but i still think its a nice looking car although the 997 turbo is gorgeous...
Old 05-29-2008, 08:18 PM
  #77  
AUS10TAT10US
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
AUS10TAT10US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Given the choice, who the hell would take an M3 over a GTR or 911?
M3 isn't even in the same class!
Old 05-29-2008, 09:10 PM
  #78  
gatti-man
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
gatti-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: austin tx
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AUS10TAT10US
Given the choice, who the hell would take an M3 over a GTR or 911?
M3 isn't even in the same class!
well if you dont like a rice mobile (gtr) then the m3 is the nice choice. Also if you have a family m3 ftw here as well.

*disclaimer* i like the gtr but to me its styling is a 1 out of 5. Id rock it any day of the week still.
Old 05-29-2008, 10:15 PM
  #79  
black06z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
black06z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Coast/Pacific Rim
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

M3 over the GTR? I must be dreaming.
Old 05-29-2008, 10:33 PM
  #80  
Cyp
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Cyp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Point
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who cares!!! I'll take the GTR over those two


Quick Reply: M3 beats GT-R and Porsche turbo in C&D comparison test



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.