NEW 350Z Roadster photo
This in the Feb. 10, 2003 AutoWeek. My scanner is down, so I took a quick shot. The printed photo is Very clear. Does NOT look photoshopped. Looks better than any other imagined converts looked. I like!
Trending Topics
Originally posted by del105
Why would they photoshop the tires to fake a convertible?
Why would they photoshop the tires to fake a convertible?
Later
Aceman
Blame the poster
The wheels look fine on the original shot....photos of photos at an angle etc..............
I just noticed a little wind blocker thingy between the covered roll hoops.
The wheels look fine on the original shot....photos of photos at an angle etc..............
I just noticed a little wind blocker thingy between the covered roll hoops.
It is a photo of a magazine. The magazine is not flat and the camera most likely has a wide angle lens. Both of these will distort the image, look at the text below and above, they are both slanted in differant angles. I am sure if he scans it, it will not look distorted, or at least as distorted. Looks like the real deal to me. Go buy Autoweek and look for yourself.
Originally posted by socalsoda
It is a photo of a magazine. The magazine is not flat and the camera most likely has a wide angle lens. Both of these will distort the image, look at the text below and above, they are both slanted in differant angles. I am sure if he scans it, it will not look distorted, or at least as distorted. Looks like the real deal to me. Go buy Autoweek and look for yourself.
It is a photo of a magazine. The magazine is not flat and the camera most likely has a wide angle lens. Both of these will distort the image, look at the text below and above, they are both slanted in differant angles. I am sure if he scans it, it will not look distorted, or at least as distorted. Looks like the real deal to me. Go buy Autoweek and look for yourself.
It just might be the real deal. I guess with all of these photoshop ones that i have seen in the past months i was not sure. I want to see a pic with the top up. Or better yet in person. I wonder if they will change anything else with the car then just the top.
Later
Aceman
Later
Aceman
what it say about the picture? it should say the photographer and/or computer artist.
its a unussual angle to photoshop, itd be very hard to do. but I agree the rear wheel looks excesivly flared, but maybe thats just how it happened. the trunk looks flatter. it looks like a different car to me, which does not appeal to me.
its a unussual angle to photoshop, itd be very hard to do. but I agree the rear wheel looks excesivly flared, but maybe thats just how it happened. the trunk looks flatter. it looks like a different car to me, which does not appeal to me.
If you are going to reveal a new convertible, why on earth would you reveal only a photo of it with the top down. Everyone can imagine what it will look like with no top. The more interesting view that is hard to conceptualize is how it will look compared to the coupe with the top UP! Why don't these magazines, etc. understand that? I'm fed up. Screw the vert. I'm going to drive my coupe till the top falls off.



