Notices
350Z Roadster General discussion for the 350Z Roadster

which is more Upscale (elegant) Audi TT Roadster or 350Z Roadster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2004, 04:16 AM
  #1  
rclab1
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rclab1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SyracuseCampus
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default which is more Upscale (elegant) Audi TT Roadster or 350Z Roadster?

Poll?

which do you think is more Elegant (upscale) as a Car?

Audit TT Roadster

or

350Z Roadster

i know this is the Nissan Forum, but just wanted to know
what everyone was thinking (opinion)

thanks
Old 01-23-2004, 04:56 AM
  #2  
ZIABLO
I am Batman
iTrader: (7)
 
ZIABLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've never been inside the TT but I assume it should have a better (more upscale) finish.

However...if you want to look feminine go for the TT
Old 01-23-2004, 05:25 AM
  #3  
bobbyz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
bobbyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

TT is more upscale.
The interior is one of the nicest interiors I have ever seen in a car. I personally think that both cars loose their flair when the roof is chopped. Both cars have similar 911ish roof lines that I personally think make the car. With it chopped, they kind of both look like bathtubs on wheels. No offense to roadster owners as this is just my opinion...I also think that the Enzo is the nicest car ever made while others think it is butt ugly.
Old 01-23-2004, 05:50 AM
  #4  
ranger5oh
Registered User
 
ranger5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blue Steel
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TT is definetly more upscale, but who cares? Those cars SUCK. I test drove a few when I was looking at the Z. The TT has got to be the worst drivign automobile I have ever been in.. ok so thats a stretch, but definetly the worst $40k car ive been in. It was so slow it was almost undrivable. they do look cool though.
Old 01-23-2004, 06:14 AM
  #5  
toykilla
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
toykilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston - Texas
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tt is a dated design.. they need a facelift.. and yes its a chick car
Old 01-23-2004, 06:39 AM
  #6  
GSCoupe
Registered User
 
GSCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Audi TT definately has a much more upscale interior, but the exterior in roadster form, I like the Z better.
Old 01-23-2004, 07:13 AM
  #7  
mofoz
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
mofoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Prospect Heights, IL
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TT is great for chicks who want style, but for guys/gals who like power, theres nowhere else to look than to the Z
Old 01-23-2004, 07:49 AM
  #8  
SungNamZ
Registered User
 
SungNamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A friend of mine who has a "TT" asked to take my "Z" for a ride. He is considering trading. Has had nothing but electrical problems. Does not hold the line like the "Z". All over the road. Opened the doors to show me how the hinges move. The only good thing going is their maintenance program.
Old 01-23-2004, 08:04 AM
  #9  
ajax77799
Registered User
 
ajax77799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

My lease on my Audi A4 2.8 Quattro was up, and I'd been planning on getting a TT for the past year, but honestly, every
time I passed one on the road, there WAS a chick driving it.
I tried the Z coupe and it was a no-brainer, it was for me. I definitely made the right decision!
Old 01-23-2004, 08:38 AM
  #10  
T.Lowry
Registered User
 
T.Lowry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My wife was the one who told me the TT was a "chick car" and should be avoided by me. She also says the same thing for any car called "Cabriolet." Hidden code words? My wife's dad owned a car dealership. Maybe she knows something.

However, it is 9 degrees and snowing outside. My Z sits with its summer tires and rear-wheel dirve in the garage, whereas the Saabs, TT's and Audi convertibles made it to the parking ramp here at work.

But then, I wouldn't change my mind either. I love the Z.
Old 01-23-2004, 08:55 AM
  #11  
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
iTrader: (1)
 
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On sports cars, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Old 01-23-2004, 09:41 AM
  #12  
fanatic6711
Registered User
 
fanatic6711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East Rutherford, Jersey
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You only by Audi TT.... if your an old woman, or a man that knows nothing about cars....
Old 01-23-2004, 09:46 AM
  #13  
ViZion
Registered User
 
ViZion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX yall
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by bobbyz
I personally think that both cars loose their flair when the roof is chopped...
i agree. i prefer the hardtops. more solid and sleek lines imo.

but back to the orig. ?
i think the z is more appealing. the tt is a sweer car with a much higher quality interior, no doubt. but it is outdated and lacking in performance compaired to other cars in it's price range.
Old 01-23-2004, 09:57 AM
  #14  
dczoner
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dczoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from an Audi A4 2.8Q to my Enthusiast... I've hardly looked back. Sure the Audi had a nicer interior, but quite frankly the TT is barely a sports car...

Now if you want "elegant" and want to approach the Z, the car for you would be the BMW Z4. That's got a slightly more aggressive demeanor than the TT without the harshness of a true sportscar such as the Z.

And I agree with the earlier post that the TT needs a facelift.
Old 01-23-2004, 10:04 AM
  #15  
T.Lowry
Registered User
 
T.Lowry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by The Brickyard Rat
On sports cars, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
You are correct. And like I said, I thought the TT looked really cool, so I looked into buying one. I also like the looks of the Honda 2000.
Old 01-23-2004, 02:31 PM
  #16  
robho
Registered User
 
robho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by T.Lowry
My wife was the one who told me the TT was a "chick car" and should be avoided by me. She also says the same thing for any car called "Cabriolet." Hidden code words?

I think the "Cabriolet" theory is bunk.

While the VW Cabrio may be a little feminine, I don't think there's anything at all wrong with a 1962 Porsche Cabriolet, or a 98 Carrera Cabriolet... And while the Ferrari Mondial is ugly, I don't think anything with the horsey up front could be considered a "chick car."

Cabriolet is just a fancy French word for a buggy with a folding top. Don't let words make you squeamish...
Old 01-23-2004, 03:38 PM
  #17  
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (2)
 
MY350Z.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

moved
Old 01-23-2004, 04:13 PM
  #18  
thumper90501
Registered User
 
thumper90501's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Valley of the Dolls
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The interior of the TT is clean and the ZR cannot compare...

-BUT-

Performance and exterior styling in my opinion goes to the Z...which is why I bought one...

That and the fact that if you're a male and over 5ft...you'll look out of place...

To me the sizing is comparable to a miata...
Old 01-23-2004, 05:57 PM
  #19  
Richardew
Registered User
 
Richardew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Audi builds fine automobiles. The car rags all love their interiors. The TT is a car to be seen in, the Z is a car to drive in. When the TT first came out they had to add a rear spoiler because it lacked high speed stability. The Z on the other hand needs a speed limiter because of it's high speed stability, to keep us americans out of jail.

My wife was the one who told me the TT was a "chick car" and should be avoided by me. She also says the same thing for any car called "Cabriolet."
I drive a 911 C4 "Cabriolet". It is anything but a "chick car". It's just a French term for convertable.
Rich
'03 FX 45 w/tech, Black/Brick
'96 911 C4 Cab
'04 350ZR, SS/BO, on the boat, due in 2/13/04
Old 01-24-2004, 09:40 AM
  #20  
NISMO_GUY2003
Registered User
 
NISMO_GUY2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by bobbyz
... I personally think that both cars loose their flair when the roof is chopped. Both cars have similar 911ish roof lines that I personally think make the car. With it chopped, they kind of both look like bathtubs on wheels.
I have to agree BOBBYZ. I used to have a Mustang GT convertible so when I decided to buy a Z, I tossed around getting the roadster but it just didn't look right with the top up.

And you're right about the coupe having a 911ish look to it--- usually one of the first things people say when they see my car for the first time is "...It kinda looks like a Porsche!"


Quick Reply: which is more Upscale (elegant) Audi TT Roadster or 350Z Roadster?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 PM.