A teaser perhaps...another drop in subbox design...your thoughts?
Originally Posted by 16psibrick
hehe no worries guys, i am not entering the market myself, i will just guide it along...
as for sub duties...the 6.5s i would use acutally sound like a decently powered 10 when done with two fo them.
but as fara s the 10 goes, i am looking at this sub, about 3" deep, and works well in .3-.4 cub feet
depths and enclosure requirements wouldnt be a problem. and with a built in grille, it should just be literally a pop in. would most likely be precisely assembled and CNCed mdf versus fiberglass
as for sub duties...the 6.5s i would use acutally sound like a decently powered 10 when done with two fo them.
but as fara s the 10 goes, i am looking at this sub, about 3" deep, and works well in .3-.4 cub feet
depths and enclosure requirements wouldnt be a problem. and with a built in grille, it should just be literally a pop in. would most likely be precisely assembled and CNCed mdf versus fiberglass
Check out exile's thin subs. They look pretty nice.
Exile is run by old old former PG employees.
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Simplicity in Sound
Simplicity in Sound
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,792
Likes: 1
From: san Jose, CA
cool guys...thanks for hte suggestions...
again, i want to emphasize i am not myself entering the market. i stand to gain pretty much nothing monetarily from this...as i am not going to be the one building, or selling the boxes. This idea stems purely from the fact that i thought it can help certain Z owners in their quest for bass and space savings.
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
again, i want to emphasize i am not myself entering the market. i stand to gain pretty much nothing monetarily from this...as i am not going to be the one building, or selling the boxes. This idea stems purely from the fact that i thought it can help certain Z owners in their quest for bass and space savings.
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 841
Likes: 9
From: indiana
Originally Posted by 16psibrick
cool guys...thanks for hte suggestions...
again, i want to emphasize i am not myself entering the market. i stand to gain pretty much nothing monetarily from this...as i am not going to be the one building, or selling the boxes. This idea stems purely from the fact that i thought it can help certain Z owners in their quest for bass and space savings.
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
again, i want to emphasize i am not myself entering the market. i stand to gain pretty much nothing monetarily from this...as i am not going to be the one building, or selling the boxes. This idea stems purely from the fact that i thought it can help certain Z owners in their quest for bass and space savings.
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
Originally Posted by 16psibrick
...This idea stems purely from the fact that i thought it can help certain Z owners in their quest for bass and space savings.
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
the original ideal from the guys is for an understrut box, whcih would be, IMO, entering a saturated market, so i am hoping to convince them to turn to this design instead
b
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM