Sub not "hitting" right...
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: orlando FL
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sub not "hitting" right...
i uninstalled and reinstalled my system this past weekend to do some sound dampening. when i put everything back together, i noticed this problem:
the sub will play normal, and it will do the low steady frequencies fine. like "booooooooooooooooom". those notes are fine.
but when it is supposed to "hit", the sub gets quieter, instead of "hitting". this only happens on the hard hitting quick notes, like the notes you would make if you hit your fist on a desk to make a beat.
lol does this explanation make sense? did i hook something up wrong? reverse polarity or something?
the sub will play normal, and it will do the low steady frequencies fine. like "booooooooooooooooom". those notes are fine.
but when it is supposed to "hit", the sub gets quieter, instead of "hitting". this only happens on the hard hitting quick notes, like the notes you would make if you hit your fist on a desk to make a beat.
lol does this explanation make sense? did i hook something up wrong? reverse polarity or something?
#3
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by StreetOC192
or air leak.
VO(knows from experience)
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: orlando FL
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so if the polarity is reversed, that would mean i would have to switch the positive and negatives?
and by air leak, you mean like something as small as a screw hole or larger? or dont think i have any leaks, but i will check
and by air leak, you mean like something as small as a screw hole or larger? or dont think i have any leaks, but i will check
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playa6tnine
so if the polarity is reversed, that would mean i would have to switch the positive and negatives?
Originally Posted by playa6tnine
and by air leak, you mean like something as small as a screw hole or larger? or dont think i have any leaks, but i will check
#6
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by playa6tnine
so if the polarity is reversed, that would mean i would have to switch the positive and negatives?
and by air leak, you mean like something as small as a screw hole or larger? or dont think i have any leaks, but i will check
and by air leak, you mean like something as small as a screw hole or larger? or dont think i have any leaks, but i will check
Polarity reversal is pretty obvious though. When the sub hits, it'll suck inward instead of outward. That's polarity reversal...
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: orlando FL
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cool guys, thanks for your help! i have some investigating to do.
as for doug, i'm not sure where you're getting at, and if my JL system is a positive or negative thing lol
as for doug, i'm not sure where you're getting at, and if my JL system is a positive or negative thing lol
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vo7848
+1
VO(knows from experience)
VO(knows from experience)
#10
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by clarkemtp
I read your thread. School of Hard Knocks. Life's best teacher (and lessons not soon forgotten).
You think that's bad. Read this thread. Start on post #4
https://my350z.com/forum/brakes-and-suspension/241538-squeaking-new-rotors-with-brakes.html
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by str8dum1
reversed polarity only matters if you have 2 subs, which the OP used the word "sub" so i assume that means 1. out of phase subs with the highs would have nothing to do with the situation that the OP is describing.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vo7848
You think that's bad. Read this thread. Start on post #4
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=241538
Don't feel bad though, I just got rid of a C6 Vette that I drove for two years. I bought it with the Z51 performance package and those brakes, even stock, squealed like a stuck pig. I was always just freakin' PUMPED to pull up at a light, step on the brakes... and have everyone WHIP their head around to see what fuggin' POS was makin' all that racket.
A change to ceramic pads was a widely known "fix" in the Vette community, but damn it... if I'd wanted crappier than stock braking, I wouldn't have popped for the Z51 in the first place. lol
/back-to-your-regulary-scheduled-thread-already-in-progress
#14
New Member
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by clarkemtp
A change to ceramic pads was a widely known "fix" in the Vette community, but damn it... if I'd wanted crappier than stock braking, I wouldn't have popped for the Z51 in the first place. lol
/back-to-your-regulary-scheduled-thread-already-in-progress
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by doug
OMG.. i changed to ceramic pads unaware of the performance issue.. i can't tell how many times i almost/did run a stop sign
Sorry guys, I wasn't implying that ANY pad of ceramic, or other origin, was any better or worse than any other pad in this application. Being a new owner, I know *squat* about the popular brake pads for the 350z.
All I meant was the GM ceramic pads that everyone used to "cure" the squealing Z51 brakes were a definite performance compromise over the stock compound pads.
That being said, you might try stepping on the pedal sooner and you won't run that big red sign.
Last edited by clarkemtp; 01-23-2008 at 01:11 PM.
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
I just skimmed through all the replies. The polarity could be an issue if another driver (large midrange?) in the car is trying to reproduce the same "hit" FQ's as the sub and is out of phase.
But, I wonder if you might have changed the X-over FQ on the amp or other crossover device when you reinstalled the equipment. If the sub is crossed over at 40hz, it might have the effect you are describing. (I don't know if your head unit has a built in sub crossover but if it does, I would check that too. -maybe it defaults to some setting you don’t want.)
Also, a ported box that is incorrectly tuned will do this also.
Sorry if any of this has already been covered.
But, I wonder if you might have changed the X-over FQ on the amp or other crossover device when you reinstalled the equipment. If the sub is crossed over at 40hz, it might have the effect you are describing. (I don't know if your head unit has a built in sub crossover but if it does, I would check that too. -maybe it defaults to some setting you don’t want.)
Also, a ported box that is incorrectly tuned will do this also.
Sorry if any of this has already been covered.
#18
New Member
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by clarkemtp
I detect a note of sarcasm in your post.
Sorry guys, I wasn't implying that ANY pad of ceramic, or other origin, was any better or worse than any other pad in this application. Being a new owner, I know *squat* about the popular brake pads for the 350z.
All I meant was the GM ceramic pads that everyone used to "cure" the squealing Z51 brakes were a definite performance compromise over the stock compound pads.
That being said, you might try stepping on the pedal sooner and you won't run that big red sign.
Sorry guys, I wasn't implying that ANY pad of ceramic, or other origin, was any better or worse than any other pad in this application. Being a new owner, I know *squat* about the popular brake pads for the 350z.
All I meant was the GM ceramic pads that everyone used to "cure" the squealing Z51 brakes were a definite performance compromise over the stock compound pads.
That being said, you might try stepping on the pedal sooner and you won't run that big red sign.
i could have braked earlier... however i didn't know that ceramic pads needed more time to stop.. my prior brakes held better and stopped quicker
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by doug
I was not being sarcastic.. i was being real...
Originally Posted by doug
1 bought ceramic pads.. and i was driving with my brother.. hit full boost.. came to a stop sign and the car wouldn't stop.. so i got back on the gas and made a left turn and kept going..
i could have braked earlier... however i didn't know that ceramic pads needed more time to stop.. my prior brakes held better and stopped quicker
i could have braked earlier... however i didn't know that ceramic pads needed more time to stop.. my prior brakes held better and stopped quicker
Let's see... No squeal? No dust? No bite. No brakes. You traded ultimate braking performance for a quiet car with nice clean wheels. Yeah, ummm, no thanks. I kept the stockers... just got rid of the car. hahaha
#20
New Member
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by clarkemtp
Anyway, again, I'm no brake pad expert as they relate to our Z cars, but in the Vettes it was a common swap for whiney Z51 owners that should've never bought the option in the first place. The GM ceramic pads squealed less and dusted less.
Let's see... No squeal? No dust? No bite. No brakes. You traded ultimate braking performance for a quiet car with nice clean wheels. Yeah, ummm, no thanks. I kept the stockers... just got rid of the car. hahaha