The Tire DB - Posts about Track and AutoX tire brands
#722
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1, my exact setup, also no rubbing problems. I'm running RT-615s and it's pretty well behaved on the street, although it does seek road grooves. Street tire wear is reasonable also, running, -2/-3 degrees of camber. On an autocross course it was very competitive in BSP combined with the rest of my suspension work (shocks/springs/sway bars), and the extra tire meat gave a big advantage in braking. Highly recommended for racing!
#724
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A. I was feeling the same way and was thinking that it would be pretty extreme to put a 275 on a 8.5" rim. I have heard of guys doing it though. Would this look pretty stupid?
Again the only reason for this crazy setup is because I want to try and make the staggered wheel look but be able to rotate the tires (not rims) as I will be burning off the rears and wearing the outsides of the front tires at a fast rate.
I am also thinking about going with a 17" setup as it will give be better handling but since I want to drive this on the street some too (Only sunny days and just hope the cops dont notice) I kinda like the look of the 18's
#725
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
I run 17's. 9.5 rear and 8.5 front.
At the moment, I run 275/40-17 and 255/40-17 tires. Just last weekend my brother and I mounted 245/40-17's on his STi stock wheels. They are 1/2" smaller than the minimum recommended wheel width for those tires but they mounted without too much trouble and look ok too.
So... I am now thinking about mounting 275/40 17 tires on my front 8.5" wheels. (also 1/2" smaller than the minimum recommended width.)
As for the look of 17's, I don't have a problem with it. My SSR's are not as pretty as a set of 18" or 19" Volk's, but 16 lbs. / wheel feels good, and, when I buy tires, (at least twice a year.) the $$$ I save on 17" rubber is also nice.
At the moment, I run 275/40-17 and 255/40-17 tires. Just last weekend my brother and I mounted 245/40-17's on his STi stock wheels. They are 1/2" smaller than the minimum recommended wheel width for those tires but they mounted without too much trouble and look ok too.
So... I am now thinking about mounting 275/40 17 tires on my front 8.5" wheels. (also 1/2" smaller than the minimum recommended width.)
As for the look of 17's, I don't have a problem with it. My SSR's are not as pretty as a set of 18" or 19" Volk's, but 16 lbs. / wheel feels good, and, when I buy tires, (at least twice a year.) the $$$ I save on 17" rubber is also nice.
Last edited by Z1NONLY; 01-25-2009 at 04:00 PM.
#727
Mad Scientist
iTrader: (6)
A. I would have to have the tires de-mounted and re-mounted and rotate the tires and not the rims. (Yes it would cost $60-$80 but being able to extend the life of a $1200 set of tires it still makes sense)
A. I was feeling the same way and was thinking that it would be pretty extreme to put a 275 on a 8.5" rim. I have heard of guys doing it though. Would this look pretty stupid?
Again the only reason for this crazy setup is because I want to try and make the staggered wheel look but be able to rotate the tires (not rims) as I will be burning off the rears and wearing the outsides of the front tires at a fast rate.
I am also thinking about going with a 17" setup as it will give be better handling but since I want to drive this on the street some too (Only sunny days and just hope the cops dont notice) I kinda like the look of the 18's
A. I was feeling the same way and was thinking that it would be pretty extreme to put a 275 on a 8.5" rim. I have heard of guys doing it though. Would this look pretty stupid?
Again the only reason for this crazy setup is because I want to try and make the staggered wheel look but be able to rotate the tires (not rims) as I will be burning off the rears and wearing the outsides of the front tires at a fast rate.
I am also thinking about going with a 17" setup as it will give be better handling but since I want to drive this on the street some too (Only sunny days and just hope the cops dont notice) I kinda like the look of the 18's
If you are planning on rotating them by remounting anyway, you might as well get staggered wheels and tires. The reason I say this is that by remounting to the opposite side, you get about all the life you are going to get anyway. Sending front to back does not really gain you any real time.
#730
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And that right there is why i hate SCCA classing so much.
Nasa points system just makes SOOO much more sense.
I never cared when i was in the mazda. But now i want to be competitive.
Hearing this **** is annoying.
I bought the car to enjoy autocrossing and track days and be at least competitive.
Nice thing about the z is that most wont know the different if i show up in my car with 17's.
Yeah track is 18x9s and 19x10's. which would have me a huge disadvantage due to their weight, nevermind the cost of tires.
Nasa points system just makes SOOO much more sense.
I never cared when i was in the mazda. But now i want to be competitive.
Hearing this **** is annoying.
I bought the car to enjoy autocrossing and track days and be at least competitive.
Nice thing about the z is that most wont know the different if i show up in my car with 17's.
Yeah track is 18x9s and 19x10's. which would have me a huge disadvantage due to their weight, nevermind the cost of tires.
#732
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok,
If you are planning on rotating them by remounting anyway, you might as well get staggered wheels and tires. The reason I say this is that by remounting to the opposite side, you get about all the life you are going to get anyway. Sending front to back does not really gain you any real time.
If you are planning on rotating them by remounting anyway, you might as well get staggered wheels and tires. The reason I say this is that by remounting to the opposite side, you get about all the life you are going to get anyway. Sending front to back does not really gain you any real time.
#733
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Oversized fitments for OEM 18x8 rims -BStock/Street Tire
Forgive me if I've overlooked the answer to this ?. I've searched and found alot of threads containing examples of people using 265-285/35 fitments on OEM 18x8's but I still have questions about which tires can do this.
I've seen people using Dunlop Star Specs, Falken 615s, B'stone RE-01Rs, various R-comps, etc, but I haven't really seen any guidelines about how to tell if a tire can stand up to this. I'm under the impression that you need a performance tire with a stiff sidewall so you still have some lateral stability. You can't reasonably expect every tire out there to be able to do this effectively right?
Specifically, I want to know if anyone has used the Sumitomo HTR ZIII in this manner?
The Sumitomo marketing blurb states: "...hard rubber sidewall fillers help blend uniform ride quality with steering response and lateral stability."
Because of "hard rubber sidewall fillers" and some pretty good reviews by owners of the tire, I'm thinking that these have a chance of working in an oversized fitment.
I'm not expecting a world beating tire here but I would like to know if anyone has any input on whether I would be able to put a set of 265/35/18s on my 18x8's and run them, exclusively for AutoX, without excess "quiver" or stability issues. Has anyone done this with a non-extreme class tire?
I've seen people using Dunlop Star Specs, Falken 615s, B'stone RE-01Rs, various R-comps, etc, but I haven't really seen any guidelines about how to tell if a tire can stand up to this. I'm under the impression that you need a performance tire with a stiff sidewall so you still have some lateral stability. You can't reasonably expect every tire out there to be able to do this effectively right?
Specifically, I want to know if anyone has used the Sumitomo HTR ZIII in this manner?
The Sumitomo marketing blurb states: "...hard rubber sidewall fillers help blend uniform ride quality with steering response and lateral stability."
Because of "hard rubber sidewall fillers" and some pretty good reviews by owners of the tire, I'm thinking that these have a chance of working in an oversized fitment.
I'm not expecting a world beating tire here but I would like to know if anyone has any input on whether I would be able to put a set of 265/35/18s on my 18x8's and run them, exclusively for AutoX, without excess "quiver" or stability issues. Has anyone done this with a non-extreme class tire?
#734
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I may not be able to answer your question. I'm just curious why you would choose that tire when there are many other performance tires out there especially in that size. Cost?
#735
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Yea ... it's all about cost. According to Tire Rack, the Star Specs are gonna run me $1030 before they arrive at my door. The Sumi's are $660 to my door. Substantially different in price. I've been using Sumi HTR ZII for HPDE and AutoX and find them decent. BTW ... don't laugh, HTR ZII got me in the top 3rd of my Street Tire class and I'm suffering from a BSP pax index. Switching my index to BS alone would put me in the top 3 or 4 most days + the HTR ZIII is a better tire in every way.
Long story short, with the economy (especially Cali economy) sucking right now, funds aren't quite flowing like they used to. I'm looking at some plan B options.
I really have my heart set on a set of Dunlop Star Specs 265/35/18, and I may still buy them anyway, but I don't want this thread to turn into people stating their case for me to buy whatever their favorite tire is.
I'm really just looking for some insight into how people know which tires can go oversize and which ones can't. Is it simply trial and error the first time someone slipped on a set of oversized Falkens or RE-01Rs?
Long story short, with the economy (especially Cali economy) sucking right now, funds aren't quite flowing like they used to. I'm looking at some plan B options.
I really have my heart set on a set of Dunlop Star Specs 265/35/18, and I may still buy them anyway, but I don't want this thread to turn into people stating their case for me to buy whatever their favorite tire is.
I'm really just looking for some insight into how people know which tires can go oversize and which ones can't. Is it simply trial and error the first time someone slipped on a set of oversized Falkens or RE-01Rs?
#736
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
I've used both the RE-01 and Azenis in 265/35/18. Once of the reasons I went with those particular sizes is they were listed as "reinforced sidewall" in the manufactures specs. That in combination with the low profile will help offset any problems with putting a wide tires on a narrow rim.
#737
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Hey Dave. I remember I talked to you a few months ago, via PM, regarding the tire sizes you were using. Now that next season is drawing closer I'm actually looking to buy now.
Sumi's write up on the HTR ZIII claims "...hard rubber sidewall fillers help blend uniform ride quality with steering response and lateral stability." This says reinforced sidewalls to me and makes me consider trying this. Unfortunately, manufacturers give no specs on sidewall stiffness.
Does anyone have any experience with this tire or a similar tire going oversize? Maybe an RE050 or a Michelin PS2 going oversize?
I can say this, I'm not going to do it if I'm gonna be the first one to try.
Sumi's write up on the HTR ZIII claims "...hard rubber sidewall fillers help blend uniform ride quality with steering response and lateral stability." This says reinforced sidewalls to me and makes me consider trying this. Unfortunately, manufacturers give no specs on sidewall stiffness.
Does anyone have any experience with this tire or a similar tire going oversize? Maybe an RE050 or a Michelin PS2 going oversize?
I can say this, I'm not going to do it if I'm gonna be the first one to try.
#740
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Falkville, AL
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And that right there is why i hate SCCA classing so much.
Nasa points system just makes SOOO much more sense.
I never cared when i was in the mazda. But now i want to be competitive.
Hearing this **** is annoying.
I bought the car to enjoy autocrossing and track days and be at least competitive.
Nice thing about the z is that most wont know the different if i show up in my car with 17's.
Yeah track is 18x9s and 19x10's. which would have me a huge disadvantage due to their weight, nevermind the cost of tires.
Nasa points system just makes SOOO much more sense.
I never cared when i was in the mazda. But now i want to be competitive.
Hearing this **** is annoying.
I bought the car to enjoy autocrossing and track days and be at least competitive.
Nice thing about the z is that most wont know the different if i show up in my car with 17's.
Yeah track is 18x9s and 19x10's. which would have me a huge disadvantage due to their weight, nevermind the cost of tires.
Run BSP. You can run any size wheel and other aftermarket parts and have as much fun. Maybe more since the RX-8's don't stray there much.