Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Thinking of Foam Filling My Chassis..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #1  
atlsupdawg#2's Avatar
atlsupdawg#2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: ATL-What U Know About That???
Default Thinking of Foam Filling My Chassis..

Wanted to throw this into the Suspension forum because this mod would better relate to this section more than the body section.

Anyway DelSol, Miata guys and even a 300Z have had great success with filling their sub-frame channels, rockers and few other chassis voids with expandable foam. We also discussed this a few years back in the Supra community but since I installed a 6 point cage it was pretty useless to go through with this mod.

The idea and theory behind this is that it not only adds rigidity to your chassis (depending on foam density) but coupled with a good suspension set-up it'll allow that suspension to work more efficiently. It does this by eliminating a lot of the so called "shock" the chassis sees when running stiffer springs/shocks. This in turn can help improve upon your suspension adjustments and the car becomes more predictable.

Here's a link to the expandable ridgid foam that I think I'll use. FOAM It's closed cell so I won't need to worry about it absorbing water. Plus, most of the jig pin holes in the frame will need to be covered up anyway so the foam does not leak out. Haven't decided on the density yet but I definitely would not go anywhere below 4lbs. I also haven't really dug into the car to see exactly where some of the other spots would benefit from the injection. Guess I'll get started on that soon before I order.

Anyway, just looking for some feedback and opinions on what other portions of the Z chassis might benefit from this..
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

new ford pickup trucks have this to reduce noise. im tryna figure out how it would help rigidity. sure its more dense..but metal is FAR stronger than foam. you could probably benifit more by triangulating the hell out of the frame
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #3  
atlsupdawg#2's Avatar
atlsupdawg#2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: ATL-What U Know About That???
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz
new ford pickup trucks have this to reduce noise. im tryna figure out how it would help rigidity. sure its more dense..but metal is FAR stronger than foam. you could probably benifit more by triangulating the hell out of the frame
Let's see, the best way to describe this...


This is a very subtle explanation, but get a piece of PVC pipe and see how much it'll flex and twist. Now inject that same piece of PVC pipe with a high density rigid foam and see how much of that flex and twist is eliminated. The higher the density of the foam used the more rigid it becomes. Almost to the point where it will hardly flex.

Same principle here only on a higher scale. The metal frame still retains the job of adding rigidity to the car but being that it is hollow, does a poor job at equally distributing various loads. By injecting a high density foam you cure that problem. The key is choosing the correct density. The more the better but if your concerned about weight you'll have to play with the numbers.

Also, ensuring that you inject the right sub-frame members will play a big roll in the success or failure of this kinda mod. What's the use of injecting both frame rails yet leaving the cross braces untouched? That's one of my goals is trying to locate the best places to inject.

BTW, the lower density foams are more for chassis noise control than rigidity. They're more along the lines of 2lbs per cubic ft. Once you start jumping up to the 8-10lb. densities in the frame rails, you're getting into the "chassis stiffening" arena.

Does this better explain the concept?
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #4  
VO...'s Avatar
VO...
Administrator
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 58,609
Likes: 2,747
From: Down Under & Dirty
Default

Interesting..Subscribing.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #5  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

what all do you have planned to the car? That is a very big step to take, and a totally unncessary one (IMHO) for a street car
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #6  
Chebosto's Avatar
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 11
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

i thought people try to remove foam/sound deadening material for weight saving purposes...

if you fill the chassis with expandable foam (polyurethane mixture of various densities) that stuff gets heavy REALLY REALLY fast. AND when it cures, it actually contracts a little bit... (not to mention it gets EVERYWHERE and it stinks)

imho if you want a stiffer chassis, getting something like the GT brace or a weld-in roll bar would probably be better, and the roll bar can double as a harness bar for the track-
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 05:47 AM
  #7  
21112's Avatar
21112
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 338
Likes: 1
From: On the edge
Default

I would think that adding that much weight would negate the benefits derived from the extra stiffness.

IE:
The weight added to stiffness added ratio would make this mod detrimental instead of helpful.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 05:52 AM
  #8  
sq40's Avatar
sq40
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,587
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

To Stop Rattles it might be worth a look.. The Chasis does need some flex you know..
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 05:58 AM
  #9  
kpiskin's Avatar
kpiskin
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

I think it'll add over 100lbs of extra weight, depending on how much you plan to add.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 06:35 AM
  #10  
njsho's Avatar
njsho
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by atlsupdawg#2
Let's see, the best way to describe this...


This is a very subtle explanation, but get a piece of PVC pipe and see how much it'll flex and twist. Now inject that same piece of PVC pipe with a high density rigid foam and see how much of that flex and twist is eliminated. The higher the density of the foam used the more rigid it becomes. Almost to the point where it will hardly flex.

Same principle here only on a higher scale. The metal frame still retains the job of adding rigidity to the car but being that it is hollow, does a poor job at equally distributing various loads. By injecting a high density foam you cure that problem. The key is choosing the correct density. The more the better but if your concerned about weight you'll have to play with the numbers.

Also, ensuring that you inject the right sub-frame members will play a big roll in the success or failure of this kinda mod. What's the use of injecting both frame rails yet leaving the cross braces untouched? That's one of my goals is trying to locate the best places to inject.

BTW, the lower density foams are more for chassis noise control than rigidity. They're more along the lines of 2lbs per cubic ft. Once you start jumping up to the 8-10lb. densities in the frame rails, you're getting into the "chassis stiffening" arena.

Does this better explain the concept?
Take a metal pipe and repeat the same procedure although you might need a machine to flex the pipe. See if that does anything. In theory it might work, but I cant see it adding that much rigidity. Better than actually doing it might be to have someone model it in a program to see what happens. There has to be someone on this forum with access to a program like that. Would Pro-E be able to duplicate that test?
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 07:22 AM
  #11  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

1. it absolutely works...there are plenty of cars out there that have done it. I know JUN Japan uses this on one of their Time Attack Evo's and offers it as a service to their customers

But the question is....for a car that sees only a once in a while track day (ie is not a race car), why bother?
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 01:49 PM
  #12  
JimRHIT's Avatar
JimRHIT
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by sq40
To Stop Rattles it might be worth a look.. The Chasis does need some flex you know..
This will not stop rattles, be real here.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #13  
Kolia's Avatar
Kolia
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 3
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

It’s an interesting idea and would probably work.

Will you be stripping the car’s interior? The sub frame might be void, but the rest of the chassis probably has a bunch of separators (the noise reduction expanding foam brackets) that will prevent the foam from going every where. That would be a minor problem.

I’m more concerned with the side impact air bags, if your car is so equipped. The impact sensors might be affected by the foam, changing the airbag deployment timing in case of an accident. Not something you want to tamper with.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
shinkuu's Avatar
shinkuu
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

theres someone with a scion tc that did this. his sn is ramaudio on scionlife.com if anyone feels so inclined to ask him how his car changed after doing this
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #15  
Blue Komodo's Avatar
Blue Komodo
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Nissan does this from the factory with the Q45. Aswell as many high-end manufactures. If your going to do this, you'll have to relocate any hard lines in the affected areas. You might want to look into seam welding the chassis. Bigger commitment, but FAR mor effective.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #16  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

I filled the rear strut bar with foam last year to knock out some of the resonance. If you tap on it with a screwdriver now it is a dead thud.

As for the rest of the car it's tough to call. I am worried that if I ever need body work in the future, this stuff would be a mess to clean out.

Chris
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Tonyz_2004_350z
South East Marketplace
1
Oct 4, 2015 12:53 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
Oct 1, 2015 06:25 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:21 PM.