Lower in the rear.....?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lower in the rear.....? ATTENTION EIBACH SPORTLINE USERS
I am running Eibach sportline springs on my Z and the rear ended up a slight bit lower then the front. And I did not cut the rear spring perches.
Anyone else come across this with the sportlines?
Here are some pics. Hard to tell in the pics but in person I can notice the difference.
PS also added 25mm wheel spacers.
Going for another alignment soon as the first shop I went to were not experienced enough to get it set up properly.
Anyone else come across this with the sportlines?
Here are some pics. Hard to tell in the pics but in person I can notice the difference.
PS also added 25mm wheel spacers.
Going for another alignment soon as the first shop I went to were not experienced enough to get it set up properly.
Last edited by 12SecRD; 07-22-2008 at 07:12 AM. Reason: Trying to get the attention of Eibach Sportline users
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Got your PM man!
...and, I think you are nuts The car looks fantastic. With my Sportlines I did not notice my rear lower than the front--HOWEVER, understand that the wheel well is larger on the front to allow for the wheels to turn, so it gives the illusion of the rear being lower than the front because there is a bit more gap.
Another thing too is that the rear of the Z at stock height is very slightly taller than the front; these springs even everything out (which is also accomplished with the spring perch mod when you use other springs).
350z-Jason, I don't know what the OP is running besides the Sportlines, but I am using Tokicos with my Sportlines and SPC front & rear camber arms/toe. I also have my rear fenders rolled; I didn't need to at first, but after settling, alignment and the 25mm spacers, they needed rolling.
...and, I think you are nuts The car looks fantastic. With my Sportlines I did not notice my rear lower than the front--HOWEVER, understand that the wheel well is larger on the front to allow for the wheels to turn, so it gives the illusion of the rear being lower than the front because there is a bit more gap.
Another thing too is that the rear of the Z at stock height is very slightly taller than the front; these springs even everything out (which is also accomplished with the spring perch mod when you use other springs).
350z-Jason, I don't know what the OP is running besides the Sportlines, but I am using Tokicos with my Sportlines and SPC front & rear camber arms/toe. I also have my rear fenders rolled; I didn't need to at first, but after settling, alignment and the 25mm spacers, they needed rolling.
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
For reference, this is my Z with same wheels, same springs and 25r/15f spacers (very similiar setup to yours):
Your stance looks identical to mine, don't you think?
On another note, what camber are you running in the rear? I'm at -1.8, but I may straighten it out a tad and camber the fronts out a bit more; it looks a bit odd to me if they aren't cambered the same amount. I don't think anyone else notices, but I do.
Your stance looks identical to mine, don't you think?
On another note, what camber are you running in the rear? I'm at -1.8, but I may straighten it out a tad and camber the fronts out a bit more; it looks a bit odd to me if they aren't cambered the same amount. I don't think anyone else notices, but I do.
Last edited by moforeynolds; 07-22-2008 at 05:26 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by quakerroatmeal
Did you guys have to upgrade the front arms?
Originally Posted by moforeynolds
I am using Tokicos with my Sportlines and SPC front & rear camber arms/toe. I also have my rear fenders rolled; I didn't need to at first, but after settling, alignment and the 25mm spacers, they needed rolling.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyleeboy770
hey curious what do you guys mean by upgrade arms sorry if this sounds stupid but would appreciate an explination
camber arms. the rear ones look like arms, and the front ones look kind of like wishbones.
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by kyleeboy770
hey curious what do you guys mean by upgrade arms sorry if this sounds stupid but would appreciate an explination
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks moforeynolds for the pic comparison and to others for the replies. Judging by your pictures it looks identical.
Also I am only using rear camber arms and toe bolts.
Front camber 1.98 and toe at .02
Rear camber 2.06 and toe at .04
I have no need for front camber and toe adjustment as the toe is in oem specs and camber is not off enough to worry about. Plus even if I had adjustable front camber I would have set at or near 2 deg to for the better handling and to match the rear.
What is others alignment specs with Eibach sportline springs?
Also I am only using rear camber arms and toe bolts.
Front camber 1.98 and toe at .02
Rear camber 2.06 and toe at .04
I have no need for front camber and toe adjustment as the toe is in oem specs and camber is not off enough to worry about. Plus even if I had adjustable front camber I would have set at or near 2 deg to for the better handling and to match the rear.
What is others alignment specs with Eibach sportline springs?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 06:19 AM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM