Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Springs for Koni Yellow shocks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 03:32 AM
  #1  
scenehouser's Avatar
scenehouser
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Default Springs for Koni Yellow shocks?

Hey guys,

I took the plunge and ordered a set of Koni Yellow Sport shocks and Whiteline Sway Bars for my 2003 Track with unrevised suspension.

Now I'm debating whether to go with the OEM Springs or get some aftermarket ones.

I can't drop more than maybe 0.6 inch because of speedbumps in my street so my choices are very limited. A little drop would be nice but I'm more interested in performance.

Which of the following springs will be the best choice from a performance perspective?


Stock (will probably do the springmountmod in the rear if I go with stock)
Spring rates in LBS 314/342

RSR 350Z linear springs .6”/.6”
Spring rates in LBS 345/417

Hotchkis 350Z Linear springs .6”/.8”
Spring rates in lbs 340/330

Tein H-tech 350z linear springs .3”/.2”
Spring rates in LBS 358/375

Thnx in advance.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 05:06 AM
  #2  
Z1NONLY's Avatar
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 95
From: SW Fl
Default

I went with RSR Ti2000 springs. I track my car a lot, and they perform well with the Koni's. (I am also running Hotchkis sways)
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #3  
scenehouser's Avatar
scenehouser
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Default

thnx for the info.

i read somewhere that the koni shocks were specifically designed for the unrevised oem springrates. the rsr rear springs are quite a lot stiffer than the oem rear springs. won't this be a problem with the valving of the rear koni shocks?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 07:14 AM
  #4  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Also check out tokiko springs, 375 in/lb f/r, 1inch drop front, 1.2 inch rear
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 07:21 AM
  #5  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

What about Tein S Techs?

Spring rate: Front 386lbs Rear 402lbs (progressive)
Lowers: Front -0.7" Rear -0.6"
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 07:30 AM
  #6  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

I wonder how hard these are to get... they seem to be something along the lines your looking for, Linear, aggressively sprung, plenty of ground clearence and streetable.


Espelir GT Springs

List Price: $280
Found Price: $225
Design: appears to be linear
F Drop: 10mm (.4in)
R Drop: 10mm (.4in)
F Stiffness: 6.9 (385)
R Stiffness: 9.2 (514)
Manufacturer: Espelir

From the "other site's" spring wiki.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
Z1NONLY's Avatar
Z1NONLY
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 95
From: SW Fl
Default

Originally Posted by scenehouser
thnx for the info.

i read somewhere that the koni shocks were specifically designed for the unrevised oem springrates. the rsr rear springs are quite a lot stiffer than the oem rear springs. won't this be a problem with the valving of the rear koni shocks?
No problems on my car. The unrevised springs were only available for 2 1/2 years. I would be surprised if Koni did not make some changes at some point.

Or...

It's also possible that the damping of the shocks have been considerably stiffer than the unrevised stock shocks from day 1. Stock Z's have understeer and using shocks to stiffen the back was probably the original intent. (rear sway bars are not allowed in stock classes, so a stiffer spring that doesn't change ride hight, or stiffer damper are the only options.)

Last edited by Z1NONLY; Jul 11, 2010 at 10:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #8  
03threefiftyz's Avatar
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 118
From: Frederick, MD
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
What about Tein S Techs?

Spring rate: Front 386lbs Rear 402lbs (progressive)
Lowers: Front -0.7" Rear -0.6"
Only the fronts are slightly progressive. I use them with my tc klines for the moment. I like them, but I plan to switch over to swift 12k/10k or 10k/8k springs over the winter.

I wonder how hard these are to get... they seem to be something along the lines your looking for, Linear, aggressively sprung, plenty of ground clearence and streetable.


Espelir GT Springs

List Price: $280
Found Price: $225
Design: appears to be linear
F Drop: 10mm (.4in)
R Drop: 10mm (.4in)
F Stiffness: 6.9 (385)
R Stiffness: 9.2 (514)

Manufacturer: Espelir
I am not crazy about those spring rates on our car.......just my .02.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 11:21 AM
  #9  
Zazz93's Avatar
Zazz93
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 8
From: So Cal
Default

Originally Posted by 03threefiftyz
I am not crazy about those spring rates on our car.......just my .02.
Yeah the rear is pretty aggressive but I think it would help free up the understeering staggered setup everyone like to run.

Last edited by Zazz93; Jul 11, 2010 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #10  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,119
Likes: 2,400
From: Sin City
Default

Originally Posted by Zazz93
I wonder how hard these are to get... they seem to be something along the lines your looking for, Linear, aggressively sprung, plenty of ground clearence and streetable.


Espelir GT Springs

List Price: $280
Found Price: $225
Design: appears to be linear
F Drop: 10mm (.4in)
R Drop: 10mm (.4in)
F Stiffness: 6.9 (385)
R Stiffness: 9.2 (514)
Manufacturer: Espelir

From the "other site's" spring wiki.
+1 and i believe you can also order Koni's that will be perfectly matched to those springs.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 08:45 AM
  #11  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz
Also check out tokiko springs, 375 in/lb f/r, 1inch drop front, 1.2 inch rear
I tested them with Koni shocks (and a whole lot of other springs) they were poor combination for whatever reason. I pulled them and sold the springs. Owner comments with the D-spec shock and spring kit have been really good. But when matched with Koni's, the spring should be avoided. BTW, the measured drop from Tokico springs is 1"/1.5"

Last edited by Gsedan35; Jul 13, 2010 at 08:51 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #12  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by Zazz93
I wonder how hard these are to get... they seem to be something along the lines your looking for, Linear, aggressively sprung, plenty of ground clearence and streetable.


Espelir GT Springs

List Price: $280
Found Price: $225
Design: appears to be linear
F Drop: 10mm (.4in)
R Drop: 10mm (.4in)
F Stiffness: 6.9 (385)
R Stiffness: 9.2 (514)
Manufacturer: Espelir

From the "other site's" spring wiki.
The wiki infomation is wrong, they are a progressive spring front and rear, removing them from the list for anyone that is asking about performance. I have seen them mentioned the most being resold in the market place purchased by owners that bought them chasing spring rates only to find out they didn't deliver on the track, which I could have told them would happen. Other error's that have cropped up, Tanabe GF210's linear as linear when they are progressive, Tein saying the 350Z H-tech is progressive when they are linear, you get the idea. If you want accurate oem and aftermarket data, go here.

http://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-s...w-updates.html

Last edited by Gsedan35; Jul 13, 2010 at 09:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #13  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
+1 and i believe you can also order Koni's that will be perfectly matched to those springs.
Perfect? No, I disagree. But here's why. I've tested Koni's extensively with a wide range of spring rates, including developing my own custom front spring seats to run tapered springs. I've tested the following,....

375/375 (Tokico D-spec springs, avoid as mentioned above)
358/375 (Tein h-tech)
358/427 (Tein H-tech fronts, oem revised rear)
448/342 (Tein tapered front, unrevised oem rear on cut down upper seat)
448/427 (Tein taperd front, revised oem rear on cut down upper seat, this is the setup I liked most of all, shocks were resold with this setup to a member that uses them for autocross)
560/427 (Koni coilover conversion, Bc Racing pillowball upper mount, revised oem rear on cut down upper spring seat)
560/500 (Koni coilover conversion, TomsMotorsport coilover spring/adjustable seat)

The 560lbs front spring, worked, but wasn't the best choice. in the rear the 500lbs spring worked, but also wasn't the best choice. Based on experience, I do not recommend beyond 448lbs in the front and beyond 450lbs in the rear without revalving the shocks.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #14  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by Zazz93
Yeah the rear is pretty aggressive but I think it would help free up the understeering staggered setup everyone like to run.
Rotation is nice, but at the cost of less traction for comming out of the hole. Better off getting as much front bar strength as you can to leverage more traction in the rear, VLSD need's all the help it can get. I can see the RS-R springs, and S-tech instead. I could also see Cobb springs, but with revised oem rear springs on cut down upper spring seats.

This platforms anti dive and anti squat geometry is why a lot of setups do not use high rear rate bias. Which my own testing does support.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #15  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by scenehouser
thnx for the info.

i read somewhere that the koni shocks were specifically designed for the unrevised oem springrates. the rsr rear springs are quite a lot stiffer than the oem rear springs. won't this be a problem with the valving of the rear koni shocks?
Koni's R&D concentrated on getting the most out of the car. The 350EVO Grand Am team that was assisting them, did make public comments about what Koni thought was wrong with the 03 shocks as did my on converstion with Jason and Grant Lee inside Koni. With less compression damping and adjustble rebound, the shocks have the range to cover the RS-R spring rates. I have shock dyno's for both shocks, though at this time I cannot locate my 03 oem front dyno's. That and my own testing is where I'm comming from.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #16  
scenehouser's Avatar
scenehouser
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Default

thnx guys this is some great info.

Gsedan35: how did the koni's perform with the tein h-tech front & rear and tein h-tech front & oem revised rear?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #17  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

Originally Posted by Gsedan35
I tested them with Koni shocks (and a whole lot of other springs) they were poor combination for whatever reason. I pulled them and sold the springs. Owner comments with the D-spec shock and spring kit have been really good. But when matched with Koni's, the spring should be avoided. BTW, the measured drop from Tokico springs is 1"/1.5"
The 1.2 is what I read but I believe its 1.5 too. I had the Dspec shock/spring kit. Its great for a aggressive stance with decent dampening but I switched to HKS III sport coilovers and theres a definite improvement (im not sure of the terminology) in the rate at which the spring returns to equilibrium.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #18  
scenehouser's Avatar
scenehouser
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Default

just got a very nice reply from lee grimes at koni north america about what year springs (unrevised/revised) work best with koni shocks:

Thank you for your interest in KONI Sport shocks for your 350Z. Although Nissan did make the running change on the spring rate, either of those springs or really any reasonably streetable performance aftermarket lowering springs will be just fine with the KONI Sports. As you increase the spring rate on a car, you typically need to increase the amount of rebound damping however the KONI Sport shocks are adjustable for rebound damping. Since the KONI damper has a very wide range of adjustment (twice as firm at the max setting as it is at the min setting), there is an extremely wide range of spring rates that these dampers will be compatible with.

So whichever of these two springs that you decide to use, you can easily adjust the shocks to suit their needs. It would not surprise me if the later, higher rate springs might need a bit higher rebound adjustment than the lower one. This is something that you as the driver can decide what feels best for your preferences on the roads that you drive and however you use the car. Although this change in rate might be a bit more of a challenge for a non-adjustable shock, the adjustable KONI Sport shock will let you easily tune to get your preference regardless of which spring that you go with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Nihsnek
Brakes & Suspension
26
Feb 9, 2016 12:57 AM
Rowlett
Misc.
3
Oct 2, 2015 10:38 AM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:55 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.