KW V2 Coilovers + camber kit
#2
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
Depends on how low you adjust them and how much camber you want
Trending Topics
#12
New Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Evanston/Oak Brook, IL
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was also worried about how low the KW's could go, but I'm not to worried anymore.
Last edited by carlili4190; 02-21-2011 at 10:34 AM.
#13
New Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Evanston/Oak Brook, IL
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://my350z.com/forum/media-share...installed.html
Here it is. He has the V1's but they have the same drop.
Edit: Kuhan if I do get the V2's I am NOT going to get A-Arms just yet.
Here it is. He has the V1's but they have the same drop.
Edit: Kuhan if I do get the V2's I am NOT going to get A-Arms just yet.
Last edited by carlili4190; 02-21-2011 at 10:36 AM.
#16
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
Here's what mine looks like with the KW V2 and camber kits:
The car doesn't sit perfectly level if the spring perch levels are the same left to right. With that in mind, the rear is about as low as it can go (not much more of a drop compared to Hotchkis springs). The fronts, however, can go much lower - I'd say 1.5" or more. 245/40/18 and 285/40/18 tires.
Hope this helps.
The car doesn't sit perfectly level if the spring perch levels are the same left to right. With that in mind, the rear is about as low as it can go (not much more of a drop compared to Hotchkis springs). The fronts, however, can go much lower - I'd say 1.5" or more. 245/40/18 and 285/40/18 tires.
Hope this helps.
#19
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
If you remove the perch, then you take away the ability to even out from side to side. As stated above, when I tried the same perch "height," the car didn't sit perfectly level.
#20
New Member
iTrader: (17)
Hmm alright guys thanks for your input. I'm currently running 285/35/19 rear tires (+12 net offset) but planning to go back to 275/35/19 when these wear out, so that means a bit more drop required to minimize the gap. I'm just worried that the KW's won't quite do it for me.
Is it bad to be at the extreme limit of the spring/damper combo's allowable height setting? I'm worried about getting the KW's and having to set the rears to maximum lowered setting and whether that would adversely affect performance, versus getting a different setup that allows me to get the rear tires flush with the wheel arches with the spring/damper setup somewhere near the middle of their allowable range.
As odd as it sounds, I'm between KW V2's and BC Racing Type BR's. Here is my pro/con list:
KW V2
Pro's: Better valving and softer springs = more comfortable ride quality
Cons: Limited ride height adjustment, requires disassembly of front shock to reuse stock upper mount, ~60% more expensive, extenders for rear dampers not available (to my knowledge)
BC BR
Pro's: Wider range of height adjustability (with the option for shorter rear springs), does not require reuse of OEM shock parts, very affordable, seems to get good reviews from members who do not track their cars
Cons: Stiffer springs and inferior damper design = harsher ride quality (although I'm still not sure how much harsher the standard bump in the road will be compared to stock suspension)
To save ~$600 on the setup I'm leaning toward the BC option, but I know I will regret it if the ride is jarring. Provided that the BC's come with 10k front/ 8k rear springs, I'm wondering how the ride quality will be when the dampers are set near or at full "soft".
Is it bad to be at the extreme limit of the spring/damper combo's allowable height setting? I'm worried about getting the KW's and having to set the rears to maximum lowered setting and whether that would adversely affect performance, versus getting a different setup that allows me to get the rear tires flush with the wheel arches with the spring/damper setup somewhere near the middle of their allowable range.
As odd as it sounds, I'm between KW V2's and BC Racing Type BR's. Here is my pro/con list:
KW V2
Pro's: Better valving and softer springs = more comfortable ride quality
Cons: Limited ride height adjustment, requires disassembly of front shock to reuse stock upper mount, ~60% more expensive, extenders for rear dampers not available (to my knowledge)
BC BR
Pro's: Wider range of height adjustability (with the option for shorter rear springs), does not require reuse of OEM shock parts, very affordable, seems to get good reviews from members who do not track their cars
Cons: Stiffer springs and inferior damper design = harsher ride quality (although I'm still not sure how much harsher the standard bump in the road will be compared to stock suspension)
To save ~$600 on the setup I'm leaning toward the BC option, but I know I will regret it if the ride is jarring. Provided that the BC's come with 10k front/ 8k rear springs, I'm wondering how the ride quality will be when the dampers are set near or at full "soft".